Workforce intermediation has emerged as a potential tool for guiding labor market adjustment. This article presents an empirical test of workforce intermediation through a study of community colleges in North Carolina. It demonstrates the positive contribution of intermediary colleges in increasing access to jobs in the pharmaceutical and bioprocessing industries. It also considers the limits of this strategy when adopted by only a subset of colleges within a larger labor market region and, specifically, the challenges this creates for forging strong relationships with employers outside the jurisdictional boundaries of individual colleges. The authors conclude by considering policy options for extending the reach of intermediation across the regional labor market through greater intercollege coordination. The authors argue that coordination efforts in North Carolina, although still in their infancy, hold considerable promise for other college systems that are looking to position themselves as institutional leaders in intermediation.
Alssid, J., Gruber, D., Jenkins, D., Mazzeo, C., Roberts, B., & Stanback-Stroud, R. (2002). Building a career pathways system: Promising practices in community college centered workforce development . Brooklyn, NY: Workforce Strategy Center.
2.
Bailey, T., & Smith Morest, V. (2006). Introduction: Defending the community college equity agenda. In T. W. Bailey & V. Smith Morest (Eds.), Defending the community college equity agenda (pp. 1-27). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Benner, C. ( 2003). Labour flexibility and regional development: The role of labour market intermediaries. Regional Studies, 37, 621-633.
4.
Benner, C., Brownstein, B., Dresser, L., & Leete, L. ( 2001, January). Staircases and treadmills: The role of labor market intermediaries in placing workers and fostering upward mobility. Paper presented at the Industrial Relations Research Association , New Orleans, LA.
5.
Benner, C., Leete, L., & Pastor, M. ( 2007). Staircases or treadmills? Labor market intermediaries and economic opportunity in a changing economy. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
Bernhardt, A., Pastor, M., Hatton, E., & Zimmerman, S. ( 2001). Moving the demand side; Intermediaries in a changing labor market. Paper presented at the Industrial Relations Research Association Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA.
7.
Dresser, L., & Rogers. J. ( 2003). Part of the solution: Emerging workforce intermediaries in the United States. In J. Zeitlin & D. Trubek (Eds.), Governing work and welfare in the new economy: European and American experiments (pp. 266-291). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
Fitzgerald, J. ( 2004). Moving the workforce intermediary agenda forward. Economic Development Quarterly, 18, 3-9.
9.
Fitzgerald, J. ( 2006). Moving up in the new economy: Career ladders for U.S. workers. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
10.
Garmise, S. ( 2006). People and the competitive advantage of place: building a workforce for the 21st century. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
11.
Garrett, R. ( 1999). Degrees of centralization of governance structures in state community college systems. In T. A. Tollefson, R. L. Garrett, & W. G. Ingram (Eds.), Fifty state systems of community colleges (pp. 1-14). Johnson City, TN: Overmountain Press.
12.
Giloth, R.P. ( 2000). Learning from the field: Economic growth and workforce development in the 1990s. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 340-359.
13.
Giloth, R.P. ( 2004). Introduction: A case for workforce intermediaries. In R. Giloth (Ed.), Workforce intermediaries for the twenty-first century (pp. 3-30). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
14.
Goldstein, H., Lowe, N., & Donegan, M. ( 2010). Transitioning to the new economy: Individual, regional and institutional factors in explaining outcomes of retraining programs. Regional Studies. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.486786
Hughes, M.A. ( 2000). Federal roadblocks to regional cooperation: The administrative geography of federal programs in larger metropolitan areas. In R. Greenstein & W. Wiewel (Eds.), Urban-suburban interdependencies (pp. 161-180). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
17.
Laufer, J.K., & Winship, S. ( 2004). Perceptions vs. reality: Employer attributes and rebranding of workforce intermediaries. In R. Giloth (Ed.), Workforce intermediaries for the twenty-first century (pp. 216-241). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
18.
Lautsch, B., & Osterman, P. ( 1998). Changing the constraints: A successful employment and training strategy. In R. Giloth (Ed.), Jobs and economic development (pp. 214-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
Lancaster, H.M. ( 1999). North Carolina. In T. A. Tollefson, R. L. Garrett, & W. G. Ingram (Eds.), Fifty state systems of community colleges (pp. 327-342). Johnson City, TN: Overmountain Press.
20.
Lowe, N. ( 2007). Job creation and the knowledge economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 21, 339-353.
21.
Marano, C., & Tarr, K. ( 2004). The workforce intermediary: Profiling the field of practice and its challenges. In R. Giloth (Ed.), Workforce intermediaries for the twenty-first century (pp. 93-123). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
22.
Osterman, P. ( 2007). Employment and training policies: New directions for less skilled adults. In H. J. Holzer & D. Nightingale Smithy (Eds.), Reshaping the American workforce in a changing economy (pp. 119-154). Washington DC: Urban Institute.
23.
Osterman, P., & Batt, R. ( 1993). Employer centered training for international competitiveness: Lessons from state programs. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12, 456-477.
24.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. ( 2007). Flexible recession: The temporary staffing industry and mediated work in the United States. Cambridge Journal of Economics , 31, 171-192.
25.
Rosenfeld, S.A. ( 2000). Community college/cluster connections: Specialization and competitiveness in the United States and Europe. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 51-62.
26.
Willis, R., Connelly, R., & DeGraff, D. ( 2003). The future of jobs in the hosiery industry. In E. Applebaum, A. Bernhardt , & R. Murnane (Eds.), Low wage America: How employers are reshaping opportunity in the workplace (pp. 407-445). New York. NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
