Federal Economic Development and Environmental Sustainability: Lessons from 20 Years of Spending

Abstract

This article builds on existing research focusing on the intersection of environmental sustainability and economic development while also contributing to a better understanding of the federal economic development landscape. Two major parts of this research work to understand federal economic development spending from 2003 to 2023 and how well environmental sustainability has been integrated into two of the largest programs. The findings reveal that the federal government has been a significant player in economic development, with more than $450 billion in average annual outlays during the study period. However, the two programs studied show minimal integration of environmental sustainability considerations. This research also highlights significant policy and implementation fragmentation in federal economic development spending.

Keywords

federal economic development sustainability environmental sustainability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

W. M.

(2006). The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century. (IUCN Renowned Thinkers Meeting, 29–31 January 2006). Cambridge: The World Conservation Union.

Bartik

T. J.

(1990). The market failure approach to regional economic development policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 4(4), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124249000400406

Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. (2023). Fact Sheets. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bipartisan-infrastructure-law/fact_sheets.cfm.

Blakely

E. J.

Bradshaw

(2002). Planning economic development: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.

Blakely

E. J.

Leigh

N. G.

(2013). Planning local economic development. Sage Publications.

Carcelli

S. P.

(2023). Special interests in foreign policy bureaucracies: Evidence from foreign aid. The Journal of Politics, 85(3), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1086/723821

Cejudo

G. M.

Michel

C. L.

(2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50, 745–767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5

Drabenstott

M. R.

(2005). A review of the federal role in regional economic development. Center for the Study of Rural America.

(2022). Target-setting, political incentives, and the tricky trade-off between economic development and environmental protection. Public Administration, 100(4), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12768

10.

Farhang

Yaver

(2016). Divided government and the fragmentation of American law. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12188

11.

Fernández-Muñiz

Montes-Peón

J. M.

Vázquez-Ordás

C. J.

(2009). Relation between occupational safety management and firm performance. Safety Science, 47(7), 980–991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.022

12.

Hammer

Pivo

(2017). The triple bottom line and sustainable economic development theory and practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242416674808

13.

Harris

Arku

(2006). Housing and economic development: The evolution of an idea since 1945. Habitat International, 30(4), 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.10.003

14.

Kessides

(1993). The contributions of infrastructure to economic development: a review of experience and policy implications. World Bank Discussion Papers.

15.

Koschinsky

Swanstrom

(2001). Confronting policy fragmentation: A political approach to the role of housing nonprofits. Review of Policy Research, 18(4), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2001.tb00209.x

16.

Koven

Lyons

(2010). Economic development: Strategies for state and local practice. International City/County Management Association.

17.

Lee

(2011). Infrastructure and economic development. In Mahani

(Ed.), Malaysia: Policies and issues in economic development (pp. 423–436). Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS).

18.

Leigh

N. G.

Blakely

E. J.

(2013). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice (5^th Ed.). Sage Publications.

19.

Leigh

N. G.

Blakely

E. J.

(2017). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.

20.

Opp

S. M.

Osgood

J. L.

Jr. (2013). Local economic development and the environment: Finding common ground. Routledge.

21.

Opp

S. M.

Saunders

K. L.

(2013). Pillar talk: Local sustainability initiatives and policies in the United States—finding evidence of the “three E’s”: Economic development, environmental protection, and social equity. Urban Affairs Review, 49(5), 678–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087412469344

22.

Optimal Solutions Group. (2021, November). Evaluation of microloan program outcomes. Final Report. https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/2022-01/Evaluation%20of%20Microloan%20Program%20Outcomes%20Final%20Reportv2_508v4.pdf.

23.

Osgood

J. L.

Jr. Opp

S. M.

Bernotsky

R. L.

(2012). Yesterday’s gains versus today’s realties: Lessons from 10 years of economic development practice. Economic Development Quarterly, 26(4), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242412465002

24.

Osgood

J. L.

Opp

S. M.

DeMasters

(2017). Exploring the intersection of local economic development and environmental policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12316

25.

Peterson

P. E.

(1981). City limits. University of Chicago Press.

26.

Portney

K. E.

(2013). Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities. MIT Press.

27.

Small Business Administration. (2024). Funding Programs. 7(a) Loans. https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/7a-loans.

28.

Small Business Administration. (2024a). Funding Programs. Microloans. https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/microloans.

29.

Small Business Administration. (2024b). Funding Programs. 504 loans https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/504-loans.

30.

Small Business Administration. (2024c). Data set. 7(a) and 504 FOIA data. https://data.sba.gov/en/data set/7-a-504-foia.

31.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2008). Office of Planning, Environment, and Reality. Air quality and sustainability highlights. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/sustainability/newsletter/ccnews0908.cfm.

32.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2011, June). Policy statement on climate change adaptation. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/Policy_on_Aaptation2011.pdf.

33.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2012, August). Federal Highway Administration. Overview of the new transportation alternatives program. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/docs/30aug_trans_alt.pdf.

34.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2013). MAP-21 Moving ahead for progress in the 21^st century. MAP-21 Performance Measurement. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/factsheets/pm.cfm.

35.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2021). Newsroom. USDOT releases state by state fact sheets highlighting the benefits of the bipartisan infrastructure law. https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/usdot-releases-state-state-fact-sheets-highlighting-benefits-bipartisan.

36.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2024). About the Environmental Review Toolkit. Environmental Review Toolkit. https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/about/about.aspx.

37.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2024a). Office of Operations. Programs. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/program_areas/programareas.htm.

38.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (n.d.). Fact Sheets on highway provisions. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/safetealu/factsheets.htm.

39.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2005). A glossary of Terms Used in the Federal Budget Process. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-05-734sp.

40.

Varga

Anselin

Acs

Z. J.

(2005). Regional innovation in the US over space and time. In Spillovers and innovations (pp. 93–104). Springer.

41.

Zhang

Warner

M. E.

Homsy

G. C.

(2017). Environment, equity, and economic development goals: Understanding differences in local economic development strategies. Economic Development Quarterly, 31(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242417712003