There is a need for rigorous definitional and empirical specification of what is meant by firm learning and the growing number of variants on this important theme. Based on a review of the literature on firm learning, the authors present a series of propositions about the state of knowledge regarding organizations' learning behaviors and capabilities. These propositions are then tested through a survey of firms in the plastics industries in the states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Empirical results suggest that firms are limited in their ability to acquire and apply new information in the face of needed change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Cohen, W. M. , & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
2.
Cyert, R. , & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Daghfous, A. , & Hottenstein, M. (1996). Technology transfer and organizational learning: Insights for industrial modernization centers. Paper prepared for the fifth International Conference on the Management of Technology, Miami, FL.
4.
Feller, I. (1993). What agricultural extension has to offer as a model for manufacturing modernization. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12, 574-581.
5.
Feller, I. (1997). Manufacturing technology centers as components of regional technology infrastructures. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27, 181-197.
6.
Feller, I. , Glasmeier, A. K., & Mark, M. M. (1996). Issues and perspectives on evaluating manufacturing modernization programs. Research Policy, 25, 309-319.
7.
Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region. Futures, 27(5), 527-535.
8.
Glasmeier, A. K. , & Fuellhart, K. (1996). What do we know about how firms learn?EBIA International Business Academy Annual Conference. Peer-Reviewed Proceedings. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm School of Economics.
9.
Kelley, M. , & Brooks, H. (1991). External learning opportunities and the diffusion of process innovations to small firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39, 103-125.
10.
Levitt, B. , & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.
11.
Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.
12.
Luria, D. , Cole, J., & Baum, A. (1992). When industrial policy arrives: The allocation of manufacturing extension. Ann Arbor, MI: Industrial Technology Institute.
13.
Mason, R. , Bowling, C., & Niemi, R. (1995). Small manufacturing enterprises and the national information infrastructure. Washington, DC: The Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, NRC.
14.
National Institute of Standards and Technology-Manufacturing Extension Partnership (NIST-MEP) . (1997). A day in the lift of the manufizcturing/extension partnership: Cave studies of exemplary engagements with clients of MEP centers. Gaithersburg, MD: Author.
15.
National Research Council . (1993). Learning to change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16.
Nelson, R. , & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
17.
Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy: Creating and sustaining superior perfo rmance. New York: Free Press.
18.
Porter, M. (1990). Competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
19.
Sabel, C. (1989). Flexible specialization and reemergence of regional economies in reversing economic decline. In P. Hirst & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), Reversing industrial decline?Oxford, UK: Berg.
20.
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Senge, P. M. (1990). Thefifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
22.
Shapira, P. , Youtie, J., & Roessner, J. D. (1996). Current practices in the evaluation of U.S. industrial modernization programs. Research Policy, 25, 300-308.
23.
Siegel, S. (1957). Level of aspiration and decision making. Psychology Review, 64, 253-262.
24.
Simon, H. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
25.
Steinbruner, J. (1974). The cybernetic theory of decision. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
