This article considers two aspects of publicly reported macroevaluations of local economies: the emphasis on job growth and the problematic relationship among the desired outcomes of local economic performance. At issue is the extent to which a jobs focus is either deceptive or in some other way detracts from our understanding of how local economies work. The purpose of this investigation is to create more sensitivity to the representational and political qualities of macroevaluations. Data from New York City are used to illustrate the argument.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies?Kalamazoo, MI: W. E. Upjohn Institute.
2.
Beauregard, R. A. (1993). Constituting economic development. In R. D. Bingham & R. Mier (Eds.), Theories of local economic development (pp. 267-283). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Beauregard, R. A. (1995). If only the city could speak: The politics of representation. In H. Liggett & D. C. Perry (Eds.), Spatial practices (pp. 59-80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Blair, J. P. (1995). Local economic development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Blakely, E. J. (1989). Planning local economic development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
Courant, P. N. (1994). How would you know a good economic development policy if you tripped over one? Hint: Don’t just count jobs. National Tax Journal, 47, 863-881.
7.
Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
Fallows, J. (1996). Breaking the news. New York: Pantheon.
10.
Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Johnson, K. (1997a, February 27). New report dulls shine of economy in New York. The New York Times, p.B1.
12.
Johnson, K. (1997b, March 7). Wall Street leads, but New York’s economy doesn’t follow. The New York Times, p. B1.
13.
Kellner, H. (1989). Language and historical representation: Getting the story crooked. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
14.
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Malanga, S. (1996). ‘96 momentum spurs economy to greater gains. Crain’s New York Business, 12(50), 1.
16.
Malanga, S. (1997). NYC economy heats up; job, wage gains widen. Crain’s New York Business, 13(24), 1.
17.
Mastro, R. (1997, March 15). New York’s job market is alive and well. The New York Times, p.23.
18.
McNally, D. (1995). Language, history, and class struggle. Monthly Review, 47, 13-30.
19.
New York City Economic Policy and Marketing Group . (1993). Strong economy, strong city. New York: Author.
20.
O’Cleireacain, C. (1993). Cities’ role in the metropolitan economy and the federal structure. In H. Cisneros (Ed.), Interwoven destinies (pp. 167-186). New York: Norton.
21.
Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Shapiro, M. J. (1992). Reading the postmodern polity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
23.
Wolman, H. , & Spitzley, D. (1996). The politics of local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly, 10, 115-150.
