Globalization of the Indian economy has dramatically influenced social life in India. The expansion of the middle class is said to have occurred as a consequence of this process. Based on ethnographic research among lower-middle-class families in West Bengal, India, the author examines the apparent paradox between women's positive perceptions of empowerment and the overall negative impact of structural adjustment policies on women. Many scholars argue that globalization has been detrimental to women due to growing structural gender inequalities, but many respondents identify greater opportunities to challenge preexisting patriarchal norms through the role models available in the globalized media. While there are increasing inequalities for households, women do not consider these to be gender disadvantages, emphasizing instead the opportunities for greater independence. The author pays particular attention to the confluence of the prowomen consumer discourses of the global market with earlier developmentalist notions of the public role of women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acker, Joan. 1999. Rewriting class, race and gender: Problems in feminist rethinking. In Revisioning gender, edited by M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, and B. B. Hess. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Arora, Dolly. 1999. Structural adjustment programs and gender concerns in India. Journal of Contemporary Asia29 (1): 328-361.
3.
Bagchi, Josodhara. 1999. Women's empowerment: Paradigms and paradoxes. In From myths to markets: Essays on gender, edited by K. Sangari and U. Chakravarti. New Delhi, India: Manohar.
4.
Bannerjee, Nirmala. 1999. Can markets alter gender relations? Gender, Technology and Development3 (1): 103-122.
5.
Basu, Amrita. 1995. The challenge of local feminisms: Women's movements in a global perspective. Oxford, UK: Westview.
6.
Basu, Rumki. 1996. New economic policies and social welfare programmes in India. Social Action46 (3): 262-277.
7.
Basu, Srimati. 2001. The blunt cutting edge: The construction of sexuality in the Bengali “feminist” magazine Sananda. Feminist Media Studies1 (2): 179-196.
8.
Bergeron, Suzanne. 2001. Political economy discourse of globalization and feminist politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society26 (4): 983-1006.
9.
Burawoy, Michael, J. A.Blum, S. George, Z. Gille, T. Gowan, L. Haney, M. Klawiter, S. H. Lopez, S. O Riain, and M. Thayer. 2000. Global ethnography: Forces, connections and imaginations in a postmodern world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10.
Centre for Women's Development Studies. 2000. Shifting sands: Women's lives and globalization. Calcutta, India: Stree.
11.
Chakravarti, Uma. 2000. State, market and freedom of expression: Women and the electronic media. Economic and Political Weekly 29 April, 12-17.
12.
Chaudhuri, Maitrayee. 1996. Citizens, workers and emblems of culture: An analysis of the First Plan document on women. In Social reform, sexuality and the state, edited by P. Uberoi. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Chaudhuri, Maitrayee. 2001. Gender and advertisements: The rhetoric of globalisation. Women's Studies International Forum22 (3-4): 373-385.
14.
Crompton, Rosemary, and Michael Mann. 1986. Gender and stratification. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
15.
Dalal, Meenakshi N. 1995. Rural women of India and the global economy. Development3 (September): 40-42.
16.
Das, Vina. 1994. Modernity and biography: Women's lives in contemporary India. Thesis Eleven39:52-62.
17.
Deshpande, Satish. 1998. After culture: Renewed agendas for the political economy of India. Cultural Dynamics10 (2): 147-169.
18.
Dewan, Ritu. 1999. Gender implications of the “new” economic policy: A conceptual overview. Women's Studies International Forum22 (4): 425-429.
19.
Einhorn, Barbara, and Eileen Janes Yeo. 1995. Women and market societies: Crisis and opportunity. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
20.
Feldman, Shelley. 1992. Crisis, Islam, and gender in Bangladesh: The social construction of a female of labor force. In Unequal burden: Economic crises, persistent poverty, and women's work, edited by Lourdes Benería and Shelley Feldman. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
Freeman, Carla. 2001. Is local:global as feminine:masculine? Rethinking the gender of globalization. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society26 (4): 1007-1037.
22.
Ganguly-Scrase, Ruchira. 2000. Globalization and its discontents: An Indian response. Journal of Occupational Science7 (3): 138-147.
23.
Ganguly-Scrase, Ruchira, and Timothy Scrase. 2001. Who wins? Who loses? And who even knows? Responses to economic liberalisation and cultural globalisation. South Asia24 (1): 141-158.
24.
Ghosh, Ratna. 1996. Economic liberalization and its impact on women and women's education. Alberta Journal of Education42 (2): 115-120.
25.
Goldthorpe, John, and Keith Hope. 1974. The social grading of occupations. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
26.
Gosovic, Branislav. 2000. Global intellectual hegemony and the international development agenda. International Social Science Journall5 (4): 447-456.
27.
John, Mary. 1998. Globalisation, sexuality and the visual field: Issues and non-issues for cultural critique. In A question of silence? The sexual economies of modern India, edited by Mary E. John and Janki Nair. Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
28.
Kabeer, Naila. 1999. Resources, agency, achievement: Reflections on the measurement of women's empowerment. Development and Change30:435-464.
29.
Kingfisher, Catherine, and Michael Goldsmith. 2001. Reforming women in the United States and Aotearoa/New Zealand: A comparative ethnography of welfare reform in global context. American Anthropologist103 (3): 714-732.
30.
Lakha, Salim. 1999. The state, globalization, and the Indian middle-class identity. In Culture and privilege in capitalist Asia, edited by Michael Pinches. London: Routledge.
31.
Marcus, George E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology24:95-117.
32.
Mathew, George. 1995. New economic policy, social development and sociology. Sociological Bulletin44 (1): 63-77.
33.
Moghadam, Valentine. 1999. Gender and the global economy. In Revisioning gender, edited by M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, and B. Hess. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Mohanty, Manoranjan. 1995. On the concept of empowerment. Indian Journal of Social Science8 (4): 333-338.
35.
Mukherjee, Soumendranath. 1975. Bhadralok in Bengali language and literature: An essay on the language of class and status. Bengal Past and Present95 (2): 225-237.
36.
Munshi, Shoma. 1998. Wife/mother/daughter-in-law: Multiple avatars of homemaker in 1990s Indian advertising. Media, Culture and Society20 (4): 573-591.
37.
Omvedt, Gail. 1997. Rural women and the family in an era of liberalization—India in comparative Asian perspective. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars29 (4): 33-44.
38.
Overbeek, Henk. 1993. Restructuring hegemony in the global political economy: The rise of transnational neo-liberalism in the 1980s. London: Routledge.
39.
Oza, Rupal. 2001. Showcasing India: Gender, geography and globalization. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society26 (4): 1066-1095.
40.
Panini, M. 1995. The social logic of economic liberalization. Sociological Bulletin44 (1): 33-62.
41.
Puri, Joyti. 1999. Woman, body, desire in post-colonial India: Narratives of gender and sexuality. New York: Routledge.
42.
Rajagopal, Arvind. 1999. Thinking about the new Indian middle class: Gender, advertising and politics in an age of globalisation. In Signposts: Gender issues in post-independence India, edited by R. Sunder Rajan. New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
43.
Robinson, William I. 1996. Globalization: Nine theses on our epoch. Race and Class36 (2): 13-29.
44.
Scrase, Timothy Joseph. 1993. Image, ideology and inequality: Cultural domination, hegemony and schooling in India. New Delhi, India: Sage.
45.
Scrase, Timothy Joseph. 2002. Television, the middle classes and the transformation of cultural identities in West Bengal, India. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies64 (4): 323-342.
46.
Sen, Krishna, and Maila Stivens. 1998. Gender and power in affluent Asia. London: Routledge.
47.
Shurmer-Smith, Pamela. 2000. India: Globalization and change. London: Arnold.
48.
Stewart, Frances, and A. Berry. 1999. Globalization, liberalization and inequality: Expectations and experience. In Inequality, globalization and world politics, edited by A. Hurrel and Ngaire Woods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
Stoller, Paul. 1997. Globalizing method: The problems of doing ethnography in transnational spaces. Anthropology and Humanism22 (1): 81-94.
50.
Sunder Rajan, Rajeshwari. 1993. Real and imagined women: Gender, culture, and post colonialism. London: Routledge.
51.
Sunder Rajan, Rajeshwari. 1999. Signposts: Gender issues in post-independence India. New Delhi, India: Kali for Women.
52.
Walby, Sylvia. 2000. Analyzing social inequality in the twenty-first century: Globalization and modernity restructure inequality. Contemporary Sociology29:813-818.
53.
Women's International Network. 1997. Women and globalization of the world economy. Women's International Network23 (24): 70-73.
54.
Wright, E. O., J. Brenner, M. Buroway, V. Burris, G. Carchedi, G. Marshall, P. Meisksins, D. Rose, A. Stinchcombe, and P. Van Parijus. 1989. The debate on classes. London: Verso.
