Gynecological surgery prompts women to consider the meanings of their uteruses and ovaries, generally taken for granted as “natural” components of female bodies. Analysis of 44 in-depth interviews with women who underwent hysterectomy indicates that a preponderance of respondents conceptualized a socially constructed hormonal hierarchy based on the degree to which ovaries were excised in the course of surgery. While retained ovaries may not always produce actual physiological benefits, respondents placed great symbolic value on ovaries (or parts of ovaries) as the source of female normality. This reflects cultural understandings that hormones produced by the ovaries are the essential determinants of sexual difference. The interweaving of social constructionist and biological perspectives in respondents' narratives helps to elucidate the complicated interaction between the material body and the social body.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Patient Education. 1992a. The menopause years. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
2.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Patient Education. 1992b. Understanding hysterectomy. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
3.
Angier, Natalie. 1997. In culture of hysterectomies, many question their necessity. The New York Times, 17 February.
4.
Beavis, E. L. G., J. B. Brown, and M. A. Smith. 1969. Ovarian function after hysterectomy with conservation of the ovaries in premenopausal women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, British Commonwealth76:969.
5.
Bell, Susan. 1987. Changing ideas: The medicalization of menopause. Social Science and Medicine24:535-542.
6.
Berek, Jonathan S. 1996. Novak's gynecology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
7.
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Bernstein, Steven J., Mary E. Fisk, Elizabeth A. McGlynn, and Diedre S. Gifford. 1997. Hysterectomy: A review of the literature on indications, effectiveness, and risks. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
9.
Boston Women's Health Book Collective. 1998. Our bodies, ourselves for the new century: A book by and for women. New York: Simon & Schuster.
10.
Bury, Michael. 1982. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness4:167-182.
11.
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.
12.
Charmaz, Kathy. 1983. Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health and Illness5:168-195.
13.
Charmaz, Kathy. 1991. Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14.
Connell, Robert W. 1987. Gender and power: Society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 1987. Accompaniments of chronic illness: Changes in body, self, biography, and biographical time. In The experience and management of chronic illness: Research in the sociology of health care, vol. 6, edited by J. Roth and P. Conrad. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16.
Cosper, B., S. Fuller, and G. Robinson. 1978. Characteristics of posthospitalization recovery following hysterectomy. Journal of Obstetrical and Gynecological Nursing7 (3): 7-11.
17.
Cutler, W. B., C.-R. Garcia, and D. A. Edwards. 1984. Menopause: A guide for women and the men who love them. New York: Norton.
18.
Deaux, Kay, and Brenda Major. 1990. A social-psychological model of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Drelich, Marvin G., and Irving Bieber. 1958. The psychologic importance of the uterus and its functions. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases126 (1): 322-336.
20.
Ehrenreich, Barbara, and Deirdre English. 1978. For her own good: 150 years of the experts'advice to women. New York: Doubleday.
21.
Elson, Jean. 1996. Castration, hysterectomy, and the construction of “woman”: Medical discourse and women's voices. Paper presented at AnnualMeetings, Society for the Study of Social Problems, New York.
22.
Elson, Jean. 2000. “Am I still a woman?”: An analysis of gynecological surgery and gender identity. Ph.D. diss., Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
23.
Elson, Jean. 2001a. An analysis of menstruation and gender identity for women who have undergone hysterectomy. Paper presented to the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research, Avon, CT.
24.
Elson, Jean. 2001b. Hormonal hierarchy: Stratification of stigma among women who have experienced hysterectomy. Paper presented to the American Sociological Association, Anaheim, CA.
25.
Elson, Jean. 2001c. Hormonal hierarchy: Stratification of stigma among women who have experienced hysterectomy. Paper presented to the Eastern Sociological Association, Boston.
26.
Elson, Jean. 2002. Menarche, menstruation, and gender identity: Retrospective accounts from women who have undergone premenopausal hysterectomy. Sex Roles46:37-48.
27.
Elson, Jean. Forthcoming. “Am I still a woman?”: Hysterectomy and gender identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
28.
Farquhar, C. M., and C. A. Steiner. 2002. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997. Obstetrics and Gynecology99:229-234.
29.
Fisher, Sue Carole. 1986. In the patient's best interest: Women and the politics of medical decisions. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
30.
Franklin, Pamela. 1991. Too many hysterectomies. New Directions for Women20:8.
31.
Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Goffman, Erving. 1977. The arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society4:301-331.
34.
Greil, Arthur. 1991a. Not yet pregnant: Infertile couples in contemporary America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
35.
Greil, Arthur. 1991b. A secret stigma: The analogy between infertility and chronic illness and disability. Advances in Medical Sociology2:17-38.
36.
Hampton, Peter, and William G. Tarnasky. 1974. Hysterectomy and tubal ligation: A comparison of the psychological aftermath. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology119 (7): 949-952.
37.
Harding, Jennifer. 1998. Sex acts: Practices of femininity and masculinity. London: Sage.
38.
Hufnagel, Vicki. 1989. No more hysterectomies. New York: New American Library.
39.
Jenkins, Ron. 1998. Oklahoma senate oks castration bill. America Online News Service. Retrieved from myinky.com.
40.
Kaltreider, N., A. Wallace, and M. Horowitz. 1979. A field study of the stress response syndrome: Young women after hysterectomy. Journal of the American Medical Association242:1499-1503.
41.
Karp, David A. 1999. Illness and identity. In Health, illness, and healing: Society, social context and self, an anthology, edited by Kathy Charmaz and Deborah A. Paterniti. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
42.
Katz, Phyllis A. 1979. Development of female identity. Sex Roles5:155-178.
43.
Kaufert, Patricia A. 1982. Myth and the menopause. Sociology of Health and Illness4:141-166.
44.
Kessler, Susan J., and Wendy McKenna. 1978. Gender: An ethnomethodological approach. New York: John Wiley.
45.
Kimball, Meredith. 1995. Feminist visions of gender similarities and differences. New York: Haworth.
46.
Korenbrot, C., A. B. Flood, M. Higgens, et al. 1981. Case study #15: Elective hysterectomy: Costs, risks, and benefits. The implications of cost-effective analysis of medical technology, background paper #2: Case studies of medical technologies. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States, Office of Technological Assessment.
47.
Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making sex: Body and gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
Lippert, Joan. 1993. Unnecessary hysterectomies. Ladies Home Journal May, 122.
49.
Love, Susan, with Karen Lindsey. 1998. Dr. Susan Love's hormone book: Making informed choices about menopause. New York: Times Books.
50.
Marshall, Helen. 1996. Our bodies ourselves: Why we should add old fashioned empirical phenomenology to the new theories of the body. Women's Studies International Forum19:253-265.
51.
Murphy, R. F. 1999. The damaged self. In Health, illness, and healing: Society, social context and self, an anthology, edited by Kathy Charmaz and Deborah A. Paterniti. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
52.
Olesen, V., L. Schatzman, N. Droes, D. Hatton, and N. Chico. 1990. The mundane ailment and the physical self: Analysis of the social psychology of health and illness. Social Science and Medicine30:449-455.
53.
Oudshoorn, Nellie. 1994. Beyond the natural body: An archaeology of sex hormones. London: Routledge.
54.
Patterson, Ralph M., and James B. Craig. 1963. Misconceptions concerning the psychological effects of hysterectomy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology85 (1): 104.
55.
Polivy, Janet. 1974. Psychological reactions to hysterectomy: A critical review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology118:417-426.
56.
Reinharz, Shulamit. 1992. Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
Richards, Bruce C. 1978. Hysterectomy: From women to women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology131 (4): 446-452.
58.
Richards, D. H. 1974. A post-hysterectomy syndrome. The Lancet October, 983-985.
59.
Riedel, H., E. Lehmann-Willenbrock, and K. Semm. 1986. Ovarian failure after hysterectomy. Journal of Reproductive Medicine42:597-600.
60.
Rock, J. A., and J. D. Thompson. 1997. TeLinde's operative gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
61.
Rogers, Wendy. 1997. Sources of abjection in western responses to menopause. In Reinterpreting meno-pause: Cultural and philosophical issues, edited by P. A. Komesaroff, P. Rothfield, and J. Daly. New York: Routledge.
62.
Ryan, M. M. 1997. Hysterectomy: Social and psycho sexual aspects. Baillieres Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology11:23-36.
63.
Schneider, Joseph, and Peter Conrad. 1983. Having epilepsy: The experience and control of illness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
64.
Scully, Diana. 1994. Men who control woman's health: The miseducation of obstetrician-gynecologists. New York: Teachers College Press.
65.
Spelman, Elizabeth. 1988. Inessential woman: Problems of exclusion in feminist thought. Boston: Beacon.
66.
Strauss, A. L., J. Corbin, S. Fagerhaugh, B. G. Glaser, D. Maines, B. Suczek, and C. L. Wiener. 1984. Chronic illness and the quality of life. St. Louis, MO: C. V. Mosby.
67.
Strauss, Helen May. 1968. Reference group and social comparison processes among the totally blind. In Readings in reference group theory and research, edited by H. H. Hyman and E. Singer. New York: Free Press.
68.
Sumner, William Graham. 1960. Folkways. New York: New American Library.
69.
Thomas, W. I., and D. S. Thomas. 1927. The child in America. New York: Knopf.
70.
Turner, Bryan S. 1992. Regulating bodies: Essays in medical sociology. London: Routledge.
71.
Turner, Bryan S.. 1996. The body and society. London: Sage.
72.
Vines, G. 1993. Raging hormones: Do they rule our lives? London: Virago.
73.
Wallis, Claudia. 1995. The estrogen dilemma. Time, 26 June, 51.
74.
Weinrich, James. 1990. Reality or construction? In Forms of desire: Sexual orientation and the social constructionist controversy, edited by E. Stein. New York: Garland.
75.
West, Candace, and Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society1:125-151.
76.
Williams, Simon J., and Gillian Bendelow. 1998. The lived body: Sociological themes, embodied issues. London: Routledge.
