While recent emphasis has been placed on transformations of gender in the public sphere, changes in gender relations between heterosexual couples in the domestic sphere have been less fully developed in the theoretical literature. The author presents evidence for change at various levels, from the discursive to the quantitative. She outlines a theoretical framework for the analysis of such change based on the “doing gender” and gender consciousness perspectives, readdressed in the light of the new emphasis on discourses of reflexivity and intimacy. She argues for a conception of change that is slow and uneven, in which daily practices and interactions are linked to attitudes and discourse, perhaps over generations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beck, Ulrich, and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 1995. The normal chaos of love. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
2.
Beck, Ulrich, A. Giddens, and S. Lasch. 1994. Reflexive modernization. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
3.
Benjamin, Orly. 1998. Therapeutic discourse, power and change: Emotion and negotiation in marital conversations. Sociology32 (4): 771-793.
4.
Benjamin, Orly, and O. Sullivan. 1996. The importance of difference: Conceptualising increased flexibility in gender relations at home. Sociological Review44 (2): 225-251.
5.
Benjamin, Orly, and O. Sullivan. 1999. Relational resources, gender consciousness and possibilities of change in marital relationships. Sociological Review47 (4): 794-820.
6.
Bittman, Michael, and F. Lovejoy. 1993. Domestic power: Negotiating an unequal division of labour within a framework of equality. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology29 (3): 302-321.
7.
Brines, Julie. 1994. Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology100: 652-688.
8.
Cancian, Frances M. 1987. Love in America: Gender and self-development. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Coltrane, Scott. 1996. Family man. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
Coltrane, Scott. 1998. Gender and families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
11.
Coltrane, Scott. 2000. Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family62 (4): 1208-1233.
12.
Connell, Robert W. 2000. The men and the boys. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
13.
Crompton, Rosemary, and F. Harris. 1999. Attitudes, women’s employment and the changing domestic division of labor. In Restructuring gender relations and employment, edited by R. Crompton. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
DeVault, Marjorie. 1991. Feeding the family: The social construction of caring as gendered work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Doucet, Andrea. 1996. Encouraging voices: Towards more creative methods for collecting data on gender and household labor. In Gender relations in public and private, edited by Lydia Morris and E. S. Lyon. London: Macmillan.
16.
Fenstermaker Berk, Sarah. 1985. The gender factory: The apportionment of work in American households. New York: Plenum.
17.
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1990. Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family52: 866-884.
18.
Ferree, Myra Marx. 1991. The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues12: 158-180.
19.
Gershuny, Jonathan. 2000. Changing times. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
Gershuny, Jonathan, and O. Sullivan. 1998. Sociological uses of time-use diary data. European Sociological Review14 (1): 69-85.
21.
Gerson, Judith M., and K. Peiss. 1985. Boundaries, negotiation, consciousness: Reconceptualizing gender relations. Social Problems32: 317-331.
22.
Gerson, Kathleen. 2001. Dilemmas of involved fatherhood. In Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families, edited by S. J. Ferguson (2nd Edition). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
23.
Giddens, Anthony. 1992. The transformation of intimacy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
24.
Goldscheider, Frances K., and L. J. Waite. 1991. New families, no families: The transformation of the American home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25.
Gupta, Sanjiv. 1999. The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family61 (3): 700-711.
26.
Hearn, Jeffrey, and D. H. J. Morgan, eds. 1990. Men, masculinities and social theory. London: Unwin Hyman.
27.
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1989. The second shift. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28.
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1995. Understanding the future of fatherhood. In Changing fatherhood: An interdisciplinary perspective, edited by M. C. van Dougen, G. Frinking, and M. Jacobs. Amsterdam: Thesis.
29.
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1996. The time bind. New York: Henry Holt.
30.
Hofstede, Geert, and Associates. 1998. Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. New York: Princeton University Press.
32.
Knijn, Trudie. 1995. Towards post-paternalism? In Changing fatherhood: An interdisciplinary perspective, edited by M. C. van Dougen, G. Frinking, and M. Jacobs. Amsterdam: Thesis.
33.
Kroska, Amy. 1997. The division of labor in the home: A review and reconceptualization. Social Psychology Quarterly60: 304-322.
34.
Lamb, Michael E., ed. 1986. The father’s role: Applied perspectives. London: Wiley.
35.
LaRossa, Ralph. 1988. Fatherhood and social change. Family Relations37: 451-457.
36.
Lennon, Mary C., and S. Rosenfield. 1994. Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology100: 506-531.
37.
Lorber, Judith. 1994. Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38.
Lupri, Eugen, ed. 1983. The changing position of women in family society. Leiden, the Netherlands: E. J. Brill.
39.
Morris, Lydia. 1990. The workings of the household. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
40.
Oakley, Ann. 1974. The sociology of housework. London: Martin Robinson.
41.
Pesquera, Beatriz. 1997. In the beginning he wouldn’t even lift a spoon. In Situated lives: Gender and culture in everyday life, edited by L. Lamphere, H. Ragone, and P. Zavella. London: Routledge.
42.
Pyke, Karen, and S. Coltrane. 1996. Entitlement, obligation and gratitude in family work. Journal of Family Issues17 (1): 60-82.
43.
Risman, Barbara. 1998. Gender vertigo. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
Robinson, John P., and G. Godbey. 1999. Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time (2nd Edition). Philadelphia: Penn State University Press.
45.
Sanchez, Laura. 1994. Gender, laboral locations and the psychology of entitlement with the home. Social Forces73: 533-553.
46.
Sanchez, Laura, and E. Kane. 1996. Women’s and men’s constructions of perceptions of housework fairness. Journal of Family Issues17: 358-387.
47.
Schwartz, Pepper. 1994. Peer marriage: How love between equals really works. New York: Free Press.
48.
Schwartz, Pepper. 2001. Peer marriage. In Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families, edited by S. J. Ferguson (2nd Edition). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
49.
Scott, Jacquie, D. F. Alwin, and M. Brown. 1996. Changing sex-role attitudes. Sociology30(3): 427-445.
50.
Skolnick, Arlene. 1992. The intimate environment: Exploring marriage and the family. New York: HarperCollins.
51.
Smart, Carol, and B. Neale. 1999. Family fragments. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
52.
Sullivan, Oriel. 2000. The division of domestic labor: 20 years of change? Sociology34 (3): 437-456.
53.
Sullivan, Oriel, and J. Gershuny. 2001. Cross-national changes in time-use: Some sociological (hi)stories re-examined. British Journal of Sociology52: 331-347.
54.
Thompson, Linda. 1991. Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues12 (2): 181-196.
55.
Thompson, Linda. 1993. Conceputalising gender in marriage: The case of marital care. Journal of Marriage and the Family55: 557-569.
56.
Thompson, Linda, and A. J. Walker. 1989. Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family51: 845-871.
57.
Voydanoff, Patricia, and B. W. Donnelly. 1999. The intersection of time in activities and perceived unfairness in relation to psychological distress and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family61: 739-751.
58.
West, Candace, and S. B. Fenstermaker. 1993. Power, inequality and the accomplishment of gender: An ethnomethodological view. In Theory on gender/feminism on theory, edited by P. England. New York: Aldyne de Gruyter.
59.
West, Candace, and D. H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society1: 125-151.
60.
Willinger, Beth. 1993. Resistance and change. In Men, work and family, edited by J. C. Hood. London: Sage.
61.
Zvonkovic, Anisa, K. Greaves, C. Schmiege, and L. Hall. 1996. The marital construction of gender through work and family decisions: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family58: 91-100.
