Research on women's preponderance among animal rights advocates explains it exclusively as a product of women's socialization, emphasizing a relational orientation of care and nurturing that extends to animals. The authors propose a more structural explanation: Women's experiences with structural oppression make them more disposed to egalitarian ideology, which creates concern for animal rights. Using data from a 1993 national sample, the authors find that an egalitarian gender ideology is a key difference in women's and men's routes to animal rights advocacy: It differentiates those more likely to endorse animal rights among women but not among men. Neither this ideology nor other variables in the analysis, however, account for women's greater overall support of animal rights in the combined sample. Reasons for this latter finding are explored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, C. J.1994. Bringing peace home: A feminist philosophical perspective on the abuse of women, children and pet animals.Hypatia9:63-84.
2.
Alaimo, S.1994. Cyborg and ecofeminist interventions: Challenges for an environmental feminism.Feminist Studies20:133-52.
3.
Baldwin, E.1993. The case for animal research in psychology.Journal of Social Issues49:121-31.
4.
Bose, C. E.
, and P. H. Rossi.1983. Gender and jobs: Prestige standings of occupations as affected by gender.American Sociological Review48:316-30.
5.
Chodorow, N.
1978. The reproduction of mothering.Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Davis, J. A.
, and T. W. Smith. 1993a. General social surveys, 1972-1993.Machine-readable data file.Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
7.
Davis, J. A.
, and T. W. Smith. 1993b. General social surveys, 1972-1993, cumulative codebook.Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
8.
Donovan, J.1990. Animal rights and feminist theory.Signs15:350-75.
9.
Epstein, C.
1988. Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender and the social order.New York: Russell Sage.
10.
Fuller, M.
[1845] 1971. Woman in the nineteenth century. Reprint, New York: Norton.
11.
Gallup, A. M.1990. Gallup “pet census” finds 170 million pets in America.Gallup Poll Monthly, Number 300 (September): 55-63.
12.
Gallup, G. G., Jr.
, and J. W. Beckstead.1988. Attitudes toward animal research.American Psychologist43:474-6.
13.
Galvin, S. L.
, and H. A. Herzog, Jr.1992a. Ethical ideology, animal rights activism, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals.Ethics & Behavior2:141-9.
14.
Galvin, S. L.
, and H. A. Herzog, Jr.1992b. The ethical judgment of animal research.Ethics & Behavior2:263-86.
15.
Gerson, J. W.
, and K. Peiss.1985. Boundaries, negotiation, consciousness: Reconceptualizing gender relations.Social Problems32:317-31.
16.
Gerson, K.
1985. Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood.Berkeley: University of California Press.
17.
Gerstel, N.
, and S. Gallagher.1994. Caring for kith and kin: Gender, employment, and the privatization of care.Social Problems41:519-39.
18.
Gilligan, C.
1982. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Gilman, C. P.1912. The beast prison.Forerunner3:128-30.
20.
Gilman, C. P.1913. Birds, bugs and women.Forerunner4:131-2.
21.
Griffin, S.
1978. Women and nature: The roaring inside of her.New York: Harper & Row.
22.
Herzog, H. A., Jr.1993. “The movement is my life”: The psychology of animal rights activism.Journal of Social Issues49:103-9.
23.
Herzog, H. A., Jr.
, N. S. Betchart, and R. B. Pittman.1991. Gender, sex role orientation, and attitudes toward animals.Anthrozoos4:184-91.
24.
Jagger, L.J.S.
1992. Collective identity at an animal rights sanctuary. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August, Pittsburgh.
25.
Jamison, W. V.
, and W. M. Lunch.1992. Rights of animals, perceptions of science, and political activism: Profile of American animal rights activists.Science, Technology, & Human Values17:438-58.
26.
Jasper, J. M.
, and D. Nelkin. 1992. The animal rights crusade: The growth of a moral protest.New York: Free Press.
27.
Jasper, J. M.
, and J. Poulsen.1993. Fighting back: Vulnerabilities, blunders and countermobilization by the targets in three animal rights campaigns.Sociological Forum8:639-57.
28.
Johnson, D.1990. Animal rights and human lives: Time for scientists to right the balance.Psychological Science1:213-4.
29.
Kellert, S. R.1980. American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: An update.International Journal of Studies on Animal Problems1:87-119.
30.
Kellert, S. R.
, and J. K. Berry.1987. Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender.Wildlife Society Bulletin15:363-71.
31.
Mohai, P.1991. Men, women and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism.Society and Natural Resources5:1-19.
32.
Myers, C.1990. A life affirming ethic: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, 325,000 strong, assume influential, controversial role in fierce national battle.Chronicle of Higher Education37: A21-A28.
33.
Peek, C. W.
, G. D. Lowe, and L. S. Williams.1991. Gender and god's word: Another look at religious fundamentalism and sexism.Social Forces69:1205-21.
34.
Plous, S.1991. An attitude survey of animal rights activists.Psychological Science2:194-6.
35.
Richards, R. T.
, and R. S. Krannich. 1991. The ideology of the animal rights movement and activists' attitudes toward wildlife.Transactions of the Fifty-Sixth North American Wildlife Natural Resources Conference, Edmonton, Alberta: 363-71.
