Continuous Glass Fiber–Polypropylene Composites Made by Melt Impregnation: Influence of Processing Method

Abstract

The efficiency of different melt impregnation methods for producing continuous glass fiber–polypropylene tapes has been evaluated. The selected methods were the common pin assisted method, a crosshead impregnation die including different vibration techniques and a slit die. The degree of melt impregnation was studied qualitatively with optical microscopy and determined quantitatively by opacity measurements. Excellent results were obtained using the radial slit die, followed by the pin chamber impregnation method. The crosshead impregnation die gave poor impregnation. With the radial slit die it was possible to achieve high fiber volume fraction and it was easy to control the fiber–matrix content. The haul off speed ranged from 1–10 m/min.

References

1. Cogswell, F. (1987). The Processing Science of Thermoplastic Structural Composites , Intern. Polymer Processing, 1: 157–165

2. Nygard, P., Mader, E. and Gustafson, C.G. (2003). Continuous Glass Fiber Reinforced Polypropylenes – An Overview of Melt Impregnation Techniques. To be published.

3. Peltonen, P., Lahteenkorva, K., Pakkonen, E.J., Jarvela, P.K. and Tormala, P. (1992). Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 5: 318–343 .

4. Gaymans R.J. and Wevers, E. (1998). Composites Part A-Applied Science and Manufacturing, 29: 663–670 .

5. Bijsterbosch, H. and Gaymans, R.J. (1993). Composites Manufacturing, 4: 85–92 .

6. Bates, P.J. and Charrier, J.M. (1999). Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 12: 276–296 .

7. Gibson, A.G. and Manson, J.A. (1992). Composites Manufacturing, 3: 223–233 .

8. Miller, A. and Gibson, A. (1996). Polymer & Polymer Composites, 4: 459–481 .

9. Svensson, N., Shishoo, R. and Gilchrist, M. (1998). Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 11: 22–56 .

10.

10. Darcy, H. (1856). Les fontaines Publiques de la Ville de Dijon, Victor Dalmont, Paris .

11.

11. Astrom, B.T., Pipes, R.B. and Advani, S.G. (1992). Journal of Composite Materials, 26: 1351–1373 .

12.

12. Williams, J.G., Morris, C.E.M. and Ennis, B.C. (1974). Polymer Engineering and Science, 14: 413–419 .

13.

13. Gutowski, T.G., Cai, Z., Bauer, S. and Boucher, D. (1987). Journal of Composite Materials, 21: 650–669 .

14.

14. Gebart, B.R. (1992). Journal of Composite Materials, 26: 1100–1133 .

15.

15. Kim, T.W., Jun, E.J. and Lee, W.I. (1989). 34th International SAMPE Symposium, pp. 323–328.

16.

16. Seo, J.W. and Lee, W.I. (1991). Journal of Composite Materials, 25: 1127–1142 .

17.

17. Unger, M. 1992. US Pat No 5,158,806.

18.

18. Chandler, H.W., Devlin, B.J. and Gibson, A.G. (1992). Plastics Rubber and Composites Processing and Applications, 18: 215–220 .

19.

19. Bradt, R. (1964). US Pat No 3,042,570.

20.

20. Dealy, J.M. and Wissbrun, K.F. (1990). Melt Rheology and its Role in Plastics Processing: Theory and Applications, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York .

21.

21. Interlaken Technology Corp., True Shear Rheometer: A New Tool for Advanced Rheological Studies, Minesota, USA.

22.

22. Urick, R.J. (1983). Principles of Underwater Sound, 3rd edn., McGraw-Hill, New York .

23.

23. Peltonen, P. and Jarvela, P. (1992). Polymer Testing, 11: 215–224 .