Smart FRP Reinforcements for Long-Term Health Monitoring in Infrastructure

Abstract

Smart glass fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements with embedded Fabry–Perot fiber-optic sensors are pultruded and investigated in both laboratory and environmental extreme conditions. Various mechanical (quasi-static and cyclic loads, fatigue loads, long-and short-term creep), thermal (from -40 to +60° C), and severe environmental (alkaline solutions with pH12.8) loads are imposed onto the smart FRP tendons, prior to their application in laboratorydesigned concrete beams. A comprehensive testing program is followed for the beams, including thermal exposure during and after concrete curing phases, static and cyclic failure-induced loadings. In all testing programs, the data obtained from the interferometric Fabry–Perot fiber-optic sensors are compared to those from an extensometer, an electrical resistance strain gage, and an LVDT. The study shows that the response, in terms of internal mechanical strain, against applied mechanical and structural loads up to the failure of the concrete beams can be steadily obtained using embedded smart FRP rebars. These results have higher accuracy when compared with other strain-measuring counterparts.

Keywords

smart FRP reinforcements pultrusion Fabry–Perot fiber-optic sensor structural health monitoring reliability assessment

References

1. ACI Committee 440 (2001). Guideline for the Design and Construction of Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars, ACI 440 1R-01, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Mich .

2. Belarbi, A. , Watkins, S.E. , Chandrashekhara, K. , Corra, J. and Konz, B. (2001). Smart Fiber-reinforced Polymer Rods Featuring Improved and Health Monitoring Capabilities, Smart Mater . Struct., 10: 427–431 .

3. CSA (2000). Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC), Section 16, Fibre Reinforced Structures, Standard CSA-S6-00, Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale, Ont .

4. Belleville, C. and Duplain, G. (1993). White-light Interferometric Multimode Fiber-optic Strain Sensor , Optics Letter, 18(1): 78–80 .

5. Habel, W.R. and Hillemeier, B. (1995). Results in Monitoring and Assessment of Damages in Large Steel and Concrete Structures by Means of FOSs , SPIE, 2446: 25–36 .

6. ISIS-Canada (2001). Reinforced Concrete Structures with Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRPs), ISIS-M04-01, The University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man .

7. Kalamkarov, A.L. and MacDonald, D.O. (1997). On the Processing of Smart FRP Reinforcements , In: 42nd International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition (SAMPE’97), Anaheim, CA, Vol. 42, Book 2: Evolving Technologies for the Competitive Edge, pp. 939–946 .

8. Kalamkarov, A.L. , Liu, H.Q. and MacDonald, D.O. (1998). Experimental and Analytical Studies of Smart Composite Reinforcements , Composites Part B: Engineering, 29B(1): 21–30 .

9. Kalamkarov, A.L. , Georgiades, A.V. , MacDonald, D.O. and Fitzgerald, S.B. (2000). Pultruded Fibre Reinforced Polymer Reinforcements with Embedded Fibre Optic Sensors , Can. J. Civ. Eng., 27: 972–984 .

10.

10. Kalamkarov, A.L. and Fitzgerald, S.B. (2000). Composite Carrier Assembly having an Encapsulated Sensor and an Associated Fabrication Method, United States Patent # 6,047,094, 10pp.

11.

11. MacGregor, J.G. and Bartlett, F.M. (2000). Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design, Prentice-Hall Canada Inc., Scarborough, ON .

12.

12. Nanni, A. , Yang, C.C. , Pan, K. , Wang, J-S. and Michael Jr., R.R. (1991). Fibre-optic Sensors for Concrete Strain/Stress Measurement , ACI Mater. J., 88: 257–264 .

13.

13. Newhook, J. , Ghali, A. and Tadros, G. (2002). Concrete Flexural Members Reinforced with Fiber Reinforced Polymer: Design for Cracking and Deformability , Can. J. Civ. Eng., 29: 1–10 .