A situational crisis communication theory (SCCT), which articulates the variables, assumptions, and relationships that should be considered in selecting crisis response strategies to protect an organization’s reputation, is advanced. Although various studies taking a situational approach have touched on certain of the theory’s variables and relationships, this study represents the first attempt to articulate and begin to test a situational theory of crisis communication. SCCT is premised on matching the crisis response to the level of crisis responsibility attributed to a crisis. The study explores one of the basic assumptions of SCCT by assessing whether the predicted correlational relationship between crisis responsibility and organizational reputation occurs across a range of crisis types. Results support the theory’s predictions and suggest ways to refine the theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barton, L. (2001). Crisis in organizations II (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: College Divisions South-Western.
2.
Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration. Albany: State University of New York Press.
3.
Benson, J. A. (1988). Crisis revisited: An analysis of the strategies used by Tylenol in the second tampering episode. Central States Speech Journal, 38, 49-66.
4.
Coombs, W. T. (1995). Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 8, 447-476.
5.
Coombs, W. T. (1998). An analytic framework for crisis situations: Better responses from a better understanding of the situation. Journal of Public Relations Research, 10, 177-191.
6.
Coombs, W. T. (1999a). Information and compassion in crisis responses: A test of their effects. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11, 125-142.
7.
Coombs, W. T. (1999b). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Coombs, W. T. , & Holladay, S. J. (1996). Communication and attributions in a crisis: An experimental study of crisis communication. Journal of Public Relations Research, 8, 279-295.
9.
Coombs, W. T. , & Holladay, S. J. (2001). An extended examination of the crisis situation: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13, 321-340.
10.
Coombs, W. T. , & Holladay, S. J. (in press). Matching crisis response strategies to crisis situations: An attribution theory-based approach to crisis management. In D. P. Millar & R. Heath (Eds.), Crisis communication: Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Coombs, W. T. , & Schmidt, L. (2000). An empirical analysis of image restoration: Texaco’s racism crisis. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12, 163-178.
12.
Fearn-Banks, K. (1996). Crisis communications: A casebook approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Fitzpatrick, K. R. (1995). Ten guidelines for reducing legal risks in crisis management. Public Relations Quarterly, 40(2), 33-38.
14.
Fombrun, C. J. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
15.
Griffin, M. , Babin, B. J., & Darden, W. R. (1992). Consumer assessments of responsibility for product-related injuries: The impact of regulations, warnings, and promotional policies. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 870-877.
16.
Hearit, K. M. (1996, Fall). The use of counter-attack in apologetic public relations crises: The case of General Motors vs. Dateline NBC. Public Relations Review, 22(3), 233-248.
17.
Heath, R. L. (1994). Management of corporate communication: From interpersonal contacts to external affairs. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Lerbinger, O. (1997). The crisis manager: Facing risk and responsibility. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Marcus, A. A. , & Goodman, R. S. (1991). Victims and shareholders: The dilemmas of presenting corporate policy during a crisis. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 281-305.
20.
McAuley, E. , Duncan, T. E., & Russell, D. W. (1992). Measuring causal attributions: The revised Causal Dimension Scale (CDII). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 566-573.
21.
McCroskey, J. C. (1966). An introduction to rhetorical communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
McLauglin, M. L. , Cody, M. J., & O’Hair, H. D. (1983). The management of failure events: Some contextual determinants of accounting behavior. Human Communication Research, 9, 208-224.
23.
Mitroff, I. I. (1988, Winter). Crisis management: Cutting through the confusion. Sloan Management Review, 29, 15-20.
24.
Mitroff, I. I. , Harrington, K., & Gai, E. (1996, September). Thinking about the unthinkable. Across the Board, 33(8), 44-48.
25.
Pauchant, T. C. , & Mitroff, I. I. (1992). Transforming the crisis-prone organization: Preventing individual, organizational, and environmental tragedies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Pearson, C. M. , & Mitroff, I. I. (1993). From crisis prone to crisis prepared: A framework for crisis management. The Executive, 7, 48-59.
27.
Sellnow, T. L. , Ulmer, R. R., & Snider, M. (1998). The compatibility of corrective action in organizational crisis communication. Communication Quarterly, 46, 60-74.
28.
Siomkos, G. , & Shrivastava, P. (1993). Responding to product liability crises. Long Range Planning, 26(5), 72-79.
29.
Sturges, D. L. (1994). Communicating through crisis: A strategy for organizational survival. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 297-316.
30.
Tyler, L. (1997). Liability means never being able to say you’re sorry: Corporate guilt, legal constraints, and defensiveness in corporate communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 11, 51-73.
31.
Winkleman, S. (1999, April). The right stuff. Chief Executive, 143, 80-81.
