Most prior media use research has assumed that people use information and communication technologies (ICTs) independently of other ICTs, that is, as discrete media. This study uses cross-organizational, in-depth interview data to uncover the important role that ICT sequences play in persuasion, information exchange, and documentation. The primary occasions for sequential ICT use were (a) preparing for meetings, (b) performing daily tasks, and (c) following up to persuade. When people need to follow up initial communication episodes, the overall groupings of ICTs represent two underlying attributes: degree of connection with others and extent of synchroneity. These findings support an expanded perspective on media richness theory and information theory by illustrating that ICT sequences can expand cues and channels and provide error-reducing redundancy for equivocal and uncertain tasks.
American Management Association. (2005). Latest research. Retrieved June 2005 from http://www.amanet.org/research/index.htm
2.
Ballard, D., & Seibold, D. (2004). Communication-related organizational structures and work group temporal experiences: The effects of coordination method, technology type, and feedback cycle on members' construals and enactments of time. Communication Monographs, 71(1), 1-27.
3.
Ballard, D., & Seibold, D. (2006). The experience of time at work: Relationship to communication load, job satisfaction, and interdepartmental communication . Communication Studies, 57(3), 317-340.
4.
Baron, N. (2008). Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control (pp. 117-194). In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Barry, B., & Fulmer, I.S. (2004). The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence. Academy of Management Review, 29, 272-292.
6.
Bauer, J.M., Berne, M., & Maitland, C.F. (2002). Internet access in the European Union and in the United States. Telematics and Informatics , 19, 117-137.
7.
Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P.L., & McPhee, W.N. (1954). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Berger, C.R., & Calabrese, R. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a development theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
9.
Boczkowski, P.J., & Orlikowski, W.J. (2004). Organizational discourse and new media: A practice perspective. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, N. Phillips, & L. Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 359-377). London: Sage.
10.
Broadbent, D.E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
11.
Browning, L.D., Sætre, A.S., Stephens, K.K., & Sørnes, J.O. (2008). Information & communication technologies in action: Linking theory and narratives of practice. New York: Routledge.
12.
Burg, B. (1991). How to cultivate a network of endless referrals . Jupiter, FL: Burg Communications .
13.
Charney, T., & Greenberg, B.S. (2002). Uses and gratifications of the Web. In C. A. Lin & D. J. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 379-407). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
14.
Chudoba, K.M., Watson-Manheim, M.B., Lee, C.S., & Crowston, K. (2005, August). Meet me in cyberspace: Meetings in the distributed work environment. Paper presented at the Academy of Management conference, Honolulu, HI.
15.
Cialdini, R.B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Computer Industry Almanac. (2006). Computer Industry Almanac Inc. Retrieved January 2006 from http://www.c-i-a.com
17.
Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191-233). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
18.
Daft, R.L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
19.
Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., & Trevino, L.K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly , 11, 355-366.
20.
Daft, R.L., & Wiginton, J. (1976). Language and organization. Academy of Management Review, 4, 179-191.
21.
Dahle, T.L. (1954). An objective and comparative study of five methods of transmitting information to business and industrial employees. Speech Monographs, 21, 21-28.
22.
Dobos, J. (1992). Gratification models of satisfaction and choice of communication channels in organizations. Communication Research, 19, 29-51.
23.
Ducheneaut, N.B. (2002). The social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A case study of electronic power games using communication genres. Information Communication & Society, 5, 153-188.
24.
Falbe, C.M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 638-652.
25.
Falcione, R.L., & Wilson, C.E. (1988). Socialization processes in organizations. In G. M. Goldhaber & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 151-170). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
Farhoomand, A.F., & Drury, D.H. (2002). Managerial information overload. Communications of the ACM, 45, 127-131.
27.
Feldman, M., & March, J. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol . Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 171-186.
28.
Fish, R., Kraut, R., Root, R., & Rice, R.E. (1993). Video as a technology for informal communication . Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 48-61.
29.
Flanagin, A.J., & Metzger, M.J. (2001). Web use in the contemporary media environment . Human Communication Research, 27, 153-181.
30.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
31.
Hesse, B.W., Werner, C.M., & Altman, I. (1988). Temporal aspects of computer-mediated communication . Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 147-165.
32.
Hsia, H.J. (1968). Output, error, equivocation, and recalled information in auditory, visual and audiovisual information processing with constraint and noise. Journal of Communication, 18, 325-353.
33.
Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual . In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34.
Katz, J.E., & Rice, R.E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
Kim, H., Kim, G.J., Park, H.W., & Rice, R.E. (2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1183-1207. Retrieved August 23, 2007, from http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00369.x
36.
King, R.C., & Xia, W. (1999). Media appropriateness: Effects of experience on communication media choice. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.), Emerging information technologies: Improving decision, cooperation, and infrastructure (pp. 143-175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
38.
Lievrouw, L.A., & Livingstone, S. (2002). The social shaping and consequences of ICTs. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Lin, C.A. (2002). A paradigm for communication and information technology adoption research. In C. A. Lin & D. J. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 447-475). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
40.
Markus, M.L. (1990). Toward a "critical mass" theory of interactive media. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 194-218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
Markus, M.L. (1994a). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice . Organization Science, 5(4), 502-527.
42.
Markus, M.L. (1994b). Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12, 119-149.
43.
Marschak, J. (1968). Economies of inquiring, communicating, deciding . American Economic Review, 58, 1-18.
44.
Marschak, J., & Radner, R. (1972). Economic theory of teams. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
McCroskey, J.C. (1966). Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65-72.
46.
McCroskey, J.C., & Teven, J.J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90-103.
47.
Metzger, M., Flanagin, A., Eyal, K., Lemus, D., & McCann, R. (2003). Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In P. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook 27 (pp. 293-335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
Monge, P.R., & Kalman, M.E. (1996). Sequentiality, simultaneity, and synchronicity in human communication. In J. Watt & C. A. VanLear (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication process (pp. 71-92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Munkejord, K. (2007). Multiple media use in organizations: Identifying practices leading to an alignment paradox. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 2, 95-118.
50.
Newhagen, J.E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the Web: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46, 4-13.
51.
Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404-428.
52.
Osterlund, C. (2007). Genre combinations: A window into dynamic communication practices. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 81-108.
53.
O'Sullivan, P.B. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management function of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403-431.
54.
Papacharissi, Z., & Rubin, A. (2000). Predictors of Internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.
55.
Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2006 ). Pew/Internet. Retrieved January 2006 from http://www.pewinternet.org/
56.
Poole, M.S. (1983). Decision development in small groups, III: A multiple sequence model of group development. Communication Monographs , 50, 321-341.
57.
Ramirez, A., Walther, J.B., Burgoon, J.K., & Sunnafrank, M. (2002). Information-seeking strategies, uncertainty, and computer-mediated communication: Toward a conceptual model . Human Communication Research, 28, 213-228.
58.
Reinsch, N.L., & Beswick, R. (1990). Voice mail versus conventional channels: A cost minimization analysis of individuals' preferences. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 801-816.
59.
Rice, R.E. (with Hart, P., Torobin, J., Shook, D., Tyler, J., Svenning, L., & Ruchinskas, J. ). (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness . Organization Science, 3(4), 475-500.
60.
Rice, R.E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451-484.
61.
Rice, R.E., & Bair, J. (1984). New organizational media and productivity. In R. E. Rice (Ed.), The new media: Communication, research and technology (pp. 185-215). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
62.
Rice, R.E., D'Ambra, J., & More, E. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison of organizational media evaluation and choice. Journal of Communication, 48(3), 3-26.
63.
Rice, R.E., Grant, A.E., Schmitz, J., & Torobin, J. (1990). Individual and network influences on the adoption and perceived outcomes of electronic messaging. Social Networks , 12, 27-55.
64.
Rice, R.E., Hiltz, S.R., & Spencer, D. (2004). Media mixes and learning networks. In S. R. Hiltz & R. Goldman (Eds.), Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning (pp. 215-237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65.
Rice, R.E., McCreadie, M., & Chang, S.L. (2001). Accessing and browsing information and communication . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
Rice, R.E., & Shook, D. (1988). Access to, usage of, and outcomes from an electronic message system. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems , 6(3), 255-276.
67.
Rice, R.E., & Shook, D. (1990). Relationships of job categories and organizational levels to use of communication channels, including electronic mail: A meta-analysis and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 27(2), 195-229.
68.
Rice, R.E., & Webster, J. (2002). Adoption, diffusion and use of new media in organizational settings. In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society (pp. 191-227). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
69.
Rideout, V., Roberts, D.F., & Foehr, U. (2005, March). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year olds. Available from the Kaiser Family Foundation Web site, http://www.kaiserfamilyfoundation.org/entmedia/7250.cfm
70.
Saunders, C., & Jones, J.W. (1990). Temporal sequences in information acquisition for decision making: A focus on source and medium. Academy of Management Review, 15, 29-46.
71.
Scott, W.A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
72.
Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
73.
Sheer, V.C., & Chen, L. (2004). Improving media richness theory: A study of interaction goals, message valence, and task complexity in manager-subordinate communication . Management Communication Quarterly, 18, 76-93.
74.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
75.
Sørnes, J.-O., Stephens, K.K., Browning, L.D., & Sætre, A.S. (2005). A reflexive model of ICT practices in organizations . Informing Science, 8, 123-142.
76.
Spradley, J.P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
77.
Stephens, K.K. (2007). The successive use of information and communication technologies at work. Communication Theory, 17(4), 486-507.
78.
Timmerman, C.E. (2002). The moderating effect of mindlessness/mindfulness upon media richness and social influence explanations of organizational media use. Communication Monographs, 69, 111-131.
79.
Turner, J.W., & Reinsch, N.L. (2007). The business communicator as presence allocator: Multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 36-58.
80.
Walther, J.B., & Parks, M.R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81.
Watson-Manheim, M.B., & Belanger, F. (2007). Communication media repertoires: Dealing with the multiplicity of media choices. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 267-293.
82.
Weick, K.E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
83.
Wilson, E.V. (2003). Perceived effectiveness of interpersonal persuasion strategies in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 537-552.
84.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media . Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.
85.
Yukl, G., & Tracey, J.B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525-535.
