Universities increasingly cast themselves as engaged institutions committed to building collaborative relationships with community-based stakeholders. Although promoted in terms of empowerment, community engagement can reproduce or accentuate problematic social relations. This qualitative case study of a campus—community partnership provides a critical analysis of community engagement. The data reveal how the ambiguities of “community,” including the politics associated with defining and representing local groups, complicate these initiatives. The analysis extends existing conceptualizations of community and community engagement by (a) illustrating how a campus/community divide serves as a rich source of critique and (b) demonstrating the need to reshape community engagement around a critical understanding of community and community representation. In addition to these contributions, this study provides a set of guidelines for future community engagement efforts.
Agamben, G. ( 1993). The coming community. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
2.
Alcoff, L. ( 1991). The problem of speaking for others. Cultural Critique, 20, 5-32.
3.
American Association of State Colleges and Universities Task Force on Public Engagement. (2002). Stepping forward as stewards of place. New York: Author.
4.
Ang, I. ( 2006). From cultural studies to cultural research: Engaged scholarship in the 21st century. Cultural Studies Review, 12, 183-197.
5.
Association of Commonwealth Universities. ( 2001). Engagement as a core value for the university: A consultation document. London: Author.
6.
Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. ( 2007, May). Canadian university engagement in international development cooperation. Retrieved October 14, 2009, from http://www.aucc.ca/policy/research/international/survey_2007_e.html
7.
Barge, J.K. ( 2006). Dialogue, conflict, and community. In J. Oetzel & Ting-Toomey (Eds.), The handbook of conflict management (pp. 517-544). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Barge, J.K., Simpson, J.L., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Introduction: Toward purposeful and practical models of engaged scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 243-250.
9.
Barge, J.K., & Mittle, M. ( 2002). Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organizational life. Communication Theory, 12, 375-397.
10.
Boyer, E. ( 1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate . Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
11.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. ( 2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
12.
Brulin, G. ( 2002). The third task of universities or how to get universities to serve their communities! In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 440-446). London: Sage.
13.
Calleson, D.C., Kauper-Brown, J., & Seifer, S.D. ( 2005). Community-engaged scholarship toolkit (Community-Campus Partnerships for Health). Retrieved May 12, 2008, from http://www.communityengagedscholarship.info
14.
Cheney, G. ( 2008). Encountering the ethics of engaged scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 281-288.
15.
Cheney, G., Wilhelmsson, M., & Zorn, T. ( 2002). 10 strategies for engaged scholarship. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 92-101.
16.
Clair, R.P. ( 1997). Organizing silence: Silence as voice and voice as silence in the narrative exploration of the Treaty of New Echota. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 61, 315-337.
17.
Cloud, D.L. ( 2005). Fighting words: Labor and the limits of communication at Staley, 1993 to 1996. Management Communication Quarterly , 18, 509-542.
18.
Commission on Community-Engaged Scholarship in the Health Professions. (2005). Linking scholarship and communities . Seattle, WA: Community-Campus Partnerships for Health.
19.
Crabtree, R.D. ( 1998). Mutual empowerment in cross-cultural participatory development and service learning: Lessons in communication and social justice from projects in El Salvador and Nicaragua. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 182-209.
20.
DeChaine, D.R. ( 2005). Global humanitarianism: NGOs and the crafting of community . Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
21.
Deetz, S. ( 1995). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
22.
Deetz, S., & Simpson, J. ( 2004). Critical organizational dialogue: Open formation and the demand of "otherness." In R. Anderson , L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 141-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Della-Piana, C.K., & Anderson, J.A. (1995). Performing community: Community service as cultural conversation. Communication Studies, 46, 187-200.
24.
Dempsey, S.E. ( 2007a). Negotiating accountability within international contexts: The role of bounded voice. Communication Monographs, 34, 311-322.
25.
Dempsey, S.E. ( 2007b). Toward a critical organizational approach to civil society contexts: A case study of the difficulties of transnational advocacy. In B. J. Allen, L. A. Flores, & M. P. Orbe (Eds.), The international and intercultural communication annual (Vol. 30, pp. 317-339). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
26.
Dempsey, S.E. ( 2009). NGOs, communicative labor, and the work of grassroots representation. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies , 6, 328-345.
27.
Depew, D.J., & Peters, J.D. ( 2001). Community and communication: The conceptual background . In G. J. Shepherd & E. W. Rothenbuler (Eds.), Communication and community (pp. 3-21). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Dewey, J. ( 1927). The public and its problems. Athens : Ohio University Press.
29.
Dougherty, D.S., & Kramer, M.W. ( 2005). A rationale for scholarly examination of institutional review boards: A case study. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 183-188.
30.
Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L.L. ( 1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago.
31.
Finkelstein, M.A. ( 2001). The scholarship of engagement: Enriching university and community. Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum , 12(4), 7-9.
32.
Fletcher, D., & Watson, T. ( 2007). Voice, silence and the business of construction: Loud and quiet voices in the construction of personal, organizational and social realities. Organization, 14, 155-174.
33.
Frumkin, P. ( 2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Ganesh, S., Zoller, H.M., & Cheney, G. ( 2005). Transforming resistance, broadening our boundaries: Critical organizational communication meets globalization from below. Communication Monographs, 72, 169-191.
35.
Ganesh, S., & Barber, K.F. ( 2009). The silent community: Organizing zones in the digital divide. Human Relations, 62, 851-874.
36.
Giroux, H. ( 2007). The University in chains: Confronting the military-industrial-academic complex. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers .
37.
Gossett, L.M., & Kilker, J. ( 2006). My job sucks: Examining counterinstitutional Web sites as locations for organizational member voice, dissent, and resistance. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 63-90.
38.
Hart, R.P. ( 1998). Introduction: Community by negation-An agenda for rhetorical inquiry. In M. J. Hogan (Ed.), Rhetoric and community: Studies in unity and fragmentation. (pp. xxv-xxxviii). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
39.
Hegde, R.S. ( 1998). A view from elsewhere: Locating difference and the politics of representation from a transnational feminist perspective. Communication Theory, 8, 271-297.
40.
Hogan, J.M. ( 1998). Rhetoric and community: Studies in unity and fragmentation . Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
41.
Holland, B.A. ( 2001). Characteristics of engaged institutions and sustainable partnerships, and effective strategies for change. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development .
42.
Holland, D., Eng, G., Powell, D., & Drew, G. ( 2007). Models of engaged scholarship: An interdisciplinary faculty group’s examination of choices, actions, methods, and strategies for engaged scholarship at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Chapel Hill, NC: Carolina Center for Public Service .
43.
Huber, J., & Harkavy, I. (Eds.). (2007). Higher education and democratic culture: Citizenship, human rights and civic responsibility ( Council of Europe Higher Education Series No. 8). Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publications.
44.
Israel, B.A., Schulz, A.J., Parker, E.A., & Becker, A.B. ( 1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.
45.
Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. ( 2004). Organizational factors that influence university-based researchers’ engagement in knowledge transfer activities. Science Communication, 25, 246-259.
46.
Joseph, M. ( 2002). Against the romance of community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47.
Kauffman, B.J. ( 1992). Feminist facts: Interview strategies and political subjects in ethnography. Communication Theory, 2, 187-206.
48.
Krone, K.J., & Harter, L.M. ( 2007). Forum introduction: Organizational scholars as public intellectuals. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 75-79.
49.
Lindlof, T.R., & Taylor, B.C. ( 2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50.
Lorde, A. ( 1984). Sister outside. Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press.
51.
Medved, C.E., Morrison, K., Dearing, J.W., Larson, S., Cline, G., & Brummans, B. ( 2001). Tensions in community health improvement initiatives: Communication and collaboration in a managed care environment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 137-152.
52.
Mohanty, C.T. ( 2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53.
Moraga, C., & Anzaldua, G. ( 1983). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York: Kitchen Table, Women of Color Press.
54.
Mumby, D., & Stohl, C. ( 1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 50-72.
55.
The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2008, April). Partnerships for public purposes: Engaging higher education in societal challenges of the 21st century. Retrieved July 14, 2008, from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/wegner/index.shtml.
56.
Ostrander, S.A. ( 2004). Democracy, civic participation, and the university: A comparative study of civic engagement on five campuses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 74-93.
57.
Owen, W. ( 1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 1-13.
58.
Owen, W. ( 1985). Thematic metaphors in relational communication: A conceptual framework. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49, 1-13.
59.
Pearce, W.B., & Pearce, K.A. ( 2000). Extending the theory of coordinated management of meaning (CMM) through a community dialogue process. Communication Theory, 10, 405-423.
60.
Putnam, L.L. ( 2009, July). The multiple faces of engaged scholarship. Keynote speech presented at the 7th Aspen Conference on Engaged Communication Scholarship, Aspen, CO.
61.
Putnam, L.L., Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. ( 1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 375-408). London: Sage.
62.
Sheperd, G. J., & Rothenbuhler, E. W. (Eds.). (2001). Communication and community . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum .
63.
Silvey, R. ( 2002). Sweatshops and the corporatization of the university . Gender, Place and Culture, 9, 201-207.
64.
Simpson, J. L., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (Eds.). (2005). Engaging communication, transforming organizations: Scholarship of engagement in action. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
65.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. ( 2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
66.
Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. ( 2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 349-407.
67.
Sullivan, M., Kone, A., Senturia, K.D., Chrisman, N.J., Ciske, S.J., & Krieger, J.W. ( 2001). Researcher and researched-community perspectives: Toward bridging the gap. Health Education & Behavior, 28, 130-149.
68.
Van de Ven, A.H. ( 2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
69.
Waldron, V.R. ( 2007). Public scholarship, relational practice: A reflection on "virtuous" partnerships. Management Communication Quarterly , 21, 118-125.
70.
Wallerstein, N.B., & Duran, B. ( 2003). The conceptual, historical, and practice roots of community-based participatory research and related participatory traditions. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 27-52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71.
Washburn, J. ( 2005). University, Inc.: The corporate corruption of American higher education. New York: Basic Books.
72.
Winter, A., Wiseman, J., & Muirhead, B. ( 2006). University-community engagement in Australia. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 1, 211-230.
73.
Young, I.M. ( 1986). The ideal of community and the politics of difference . Social Theory and Practice, 12(1), 1-26.
74.
Zoller, H.M. ( 2000). "A place you haven’t visited before": Creating the conditions for community dialogue. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 191-207.
