Concluding Thoughts and Challenges

Abstract

This special issue of Management Communication Quarterly mines the rhetorical heritage to explore the challenges facing those who engage in and critique external organizational rhetoric, setting its sights on helping organizations make society a better place to live. Toward this end, rhetoric focuses on strategic communication influences that at their best result from or foster collaborative decisions and cocreated meaning that align stakeholder interests. This special issue demonstrates the eclectic and complex theories, applied contexts, and ongoing arguments needed to weave the fabric of external organizational communication. Over the years, Robert Heath and others have been advocates for drawing judiciously on the rhetorical heritage as guiding foundation for issues management and public relations activities. Rather than merely acknowledge the pragmatic or utilitarian role of discourse, this analysis also aspires to understand and champion its application to socially relevant ends. In that quest, several themes stand out: (a) In theory and practice external organizational rhetoric weighs self-interest against others’ enlightened interests and choices; (b) organizations as modern rhetors engage in discourse that is context relevant and judged by the quality of engagement and the ends achieved thereby; and (c) in theory and practice external organizational rhetoric weighs relationship between language that is never neutral and the power advanced for narrow or shared interests.

Keywords

external rhetoric public relations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bitzer, L.F. ( 1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1-14.

Bizzell, P. , & Herzberg, B. ( 1990). Introduction. In P. Bizzell & B. Herzberg (Eds.), The rhetorical tradition: Readings from classical times to the present (pp. 19-37). Boston, MA: Bedford.

Boyd, J. , & Waymer, D. ( 2011). Organizational Rhetoric: A Subject of Interest(s). Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 474-493.

Brummett, B. ( 1995). Scandalous rhetorics. In W. N. Elwood (Ed.), Public relations inquiry as rhetorical criticism: Case studies of corporate discourse and social influence (pp. 13-23). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Deetz, S.A. ( 1982). Critical interpretive research in organizational communication . Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 131-149.

Heath, R.L. ( 2006). Onward into more fog: Thoughts on public relations’ research directions. Journal of Public Relations Research , 18(2), 93-114.

Heath, R.L. ( 2011). External Organizational Rhetoric: Bridging Management and Sociopolitical Discourse. Management Communication Quarterly , 25, 415-435.

Ihlen, Ø. ( 2011). On Barnyard Scrambles: Toward a Rhetoric of Public Relations . Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 455-473.

L’Etang, J.L. ( 2005). Critical public relations: Some reflections. Public Relations Review, 31, 521-526.

10.

Sproule, J.M. ( 1989). Organizational rhetoric and the public sphere. Communication Studies, 40, 258-265.

11.

Wallace, K.R. ( 1963). The substance of rhetoric: Good reasons. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 49, 239-249.

12.

Weaver, R.M. ( 1985). The ethics of rhetoric. Davis, CA : Hermagoras Press. (Original work published 1953)