The purpose of this article is to articulate how the Roy adaptation model has been extended as a conceptual framework to meet changing global needs. Nursing’s social mandate is described within the significant global changes of this century. The required synthesis of the individual and common good is predicated within the thinking of the model. Changes are described with specific examples of groups from the family to global society levels. The implications of this work for knowledge development are identified.
American Nurses Association. (2010). Nursing’s social policy statement: The essence of the professional (3rd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Author.
4.
Boston-Based Adaptation Research in Nursing Society. (1999). Roy adaptation model-based research: 25 years of contributions to nursing science. Indianapolis, IN: Center Nursing Press.
DerberC. (2003). People before profit: The new globalisation in an age of terror, big money, and economic crisis. London: Souvenir Press.
7.
DonaldsonS. (2000). Breakthroughs in scientific research: The discipline of nursing, 1960–1999. In FitzpatrickJ.GoeppingerJ. (Eds.), Annual Review of Nursing Research (pp. 247-311), New York: Springer.
8.
GrayL. (2009, December15). Copenhagen climate summit: Desmond Tutu calls for climate justice. The Telegraph.
9.
Institute of Medicine. (2009). Priorities for the national vaccine plan. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
10.
LaszloE. (2008). Quantum shift in the global brain: How the new scientific reality can change us and our world. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.
11.
MaritainJ. (1966). The person and the common good. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
12.
McCurryM.RevellH. S.RoyC. (2009). Knowledge for the good of the individual and society: Linking philosophy, disciplinary goals, theory and practice. Nursing Philosophy, 11(1), 42-52.
13.
O’MurchuD. (2002). Evolutionary faith: Rediscovering God in our great story. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
14.
Roy Adaptation Association. (2011). Roy adaptation model research review 1995-2010. Manuscript in preparation.
15.
RoyC. (1983). Roy adaptation model and analysis and application to the expectant family and the family in primary care. In ClementsL.RobertsF. B.Family health: A theoretical approach to nursing care (pp. 255-278; 298-303, 375-378). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
16.
RoyC. (1984a). The Roy adaptation model: Applications in community health nursing. In AssayM. K.OsslerC. C. (Eds.), Conceptual models of nursing. applications in community health nursing. Proceedings of the eighth annual community health nursing conference (pp. 51-73). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.
17.
RoyC. (1984b, Spring). Values for science: A clinical nurse scholar’s perspective. Inaugural address at the Geraldine Crawford Distinguished Nursing Lecture Series, University of San Francisco, School of Nursing.
18.
RoyC. (1988). An explication of the philosophical assumptions of the Roy adaptation model. Nursing Science Quarterly, 1, 26-34.
19.
RoyC. (1996). Knowledge as universal cosmic imperative. In Proceedings of ENRS theory interest group knowledge conference 1996. Developing knowledge for nursing practice: Three philosophical modes for linking theory and practice (pp. 95-117). Chestnut Hill, MA: BC Press.
20.
RoyC. (1997). Future of the Roy model: Challenge to redefine adaptation. Nursing Science Quarterly, 10, 42-48.
21.
RoyC. (2007). Update from the future: Thinking of theorist Callista Roy. Nursing Science Quarterly, 20, 113-116.
22.
RoyC. (2008). Adversity and theory: The broad picture. Nursing Science Quarterly, 21, 138-139.
23.
RoyC. (2009). The Roy adaptation model (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
24.
RoyC.JonesD. (Eds.). (2007). Nursing knowledge development and clinical practice. New York: Springer.
25.
SwimmeB.BerryT. (1992). The universe story. San Francisco: Harper.
WebbV. (2002). Florence Nightingale the making of a radical theologian. St. Louis, MO: Chalice Press.
28.
WillisD. G.GraceP. J.RoyC. (2008) A central unifying focus for the discipline: Facilitating humanization, meaning, choice, quality of life, and healing in living and dying. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(1), E28-E40.
