A correlation study design was used to examine the interrelatedness of power, attitudes regarding intermittent fetal monitoring, and perceived barriers to research utilization with a labor and delivery nurse’s attitude toward patient advocacy using the conceptual framework of the science of unitary human beings. The linear combination of the three independent variables was significantly correlated to attitude toward patient advocacy and power as knowing participation in change had the greatest impact on patient advocacy.
AlfirevicZ.DevaneD.GyteG. M. (2006). Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labor. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 3, Article Number CD006066. doi: 10.1002/1465185.CD006066
2.
AlligoodM. R.TomeyA. M. (2010). Nursing theorists and their work (7th ed.). Maryland Height, Missouri, MO: Mosby Elsevier.
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2009). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106. Intrapartum fetal heart monitoring: Nomenclature interpretation, and general management principles. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114(1), 192-202. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106
Association of Women’s Health and Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. (2008). Fetal heart monitoring. Washington, DC: Author.
9.
BalasE.BorenS. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for healthcare improvement. In BemmelJ.McCrayA. T. (Eds.), Yearbook of medical informatics 2000: Patient centered systems (pp. 65-70). Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft.mbH.
10.
BantaH. D.ThackerS. (1979). Policies toward medical technology: The case of electronic fetal monitoring. American Journal of Public Health, 69(9), 931-935.
11.
BarrettE. A. (1983). An empirical investigation of Martha E. Rogers’s principle of helicy: The relationship of human field motion and power. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.
12.
BarrettE. A. (1990). A measure of power as knowing participation in change. In StricklandO. L.WaltzC. A. (Eds.), Measurement of nursing outcomes: Measuring client self care and coping skills (Vol. 4, pp. 159-175). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
13.
BarrettE. A. (2010). Power as knowing participation in change: What’s new and what’s next. Nursing Science Quarterly, 23(47), 47-58. doi: 10.1177/0894318409353797
14.
Barrett-SheridanS. E. (2009). A quantitative correlational study of political behavior and attitudes of nurses toward macrosocial patient advocacy [doctoral dissertation]. University of Phoenix.
15.
BoyleH. J. (2005). Patient advocacy in the perioperative setting. Association of Operating Room Nurses Journal, 82(2), 250-262. doi: 10.1016/S00012092(06)60317-7
16.
BryarR. M.ClossS. J.BaumG.CookeJ.GriffithsJ.HostickT.… ThompsonD. R. (2003). The Yorkshire BARRIERS project: Diagnostic analysis of barriers to research utilization. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40, 73-84. doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00039-1
17.
BuX. (2005). Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument: Attitudes toward patient advocacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The State University of New York at Buffalo.
18.
BuX.JezewskiM. A. (2007). Developing a mid-range theory of patient advocacy through concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(1), 101110. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04096.x
19.
BuX.WuY. B. (2008). Development and psychometric evaluation of the instrument: Attitude toward patient advocacy. Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 63-75. doi: 10.1002/nur.20233
20.
CarlsonC. L.PlonczynskiD. J. (2008). Has the Barriers Scale changed nursing practice? An integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(4), 322-333. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04705.x
21.
CiliskaD. (2006). Evidence-based nursing: How far have we come? What’s next?Evidence Based Nursing, 9, 38-40. doi: 10.1136/ebn.9.2.38
22.
CranstonC. S. (1980). Obstetrical nurses’ attitudes toward fetal monitoring. Journal of Obstetrical, Gynecological, and Neonatal Nursing, 9(6), 344-347. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.1980.tb01342.x
23.
CuriaM. (2008). Nursing advocacy: Perceptions of and recollections of acquisition of the role by practicing nurses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Capella University.
24.
CurtinL. L. (1979). The nurse as advocate: A philosophical foundation for nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 1(3), 1-10.
25.
DearholtS. L.DangD. (2012). John Hopkins nursing evidence based practice model and guidelines (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
26.
DeclercqE. R.SakalaC.CorryM. P.ApplebaumS. (2006). Listening to mothers II: Report of the second national U.S. survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection. Retrieved from www.childbirthconnection.org/listeningtomothers/
27.
DillmanD. A.SmythJ. D.ChristianL. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed mode survey: The tailored design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
28.
DixonA. (1981). The electronic fetal monitor: Should every mother have one?Canadian Family Physician, 27, 1023-1028.
29.
EstabrooksC. A.O’LearyK. A.RickerK. L.HumphreyC. K. (2003). The Internet and access to evidence: How are nurses positioned?Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(1), 73-81. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02581.x
30.
FawcettJ. (2005). Contemporary nursing knowledge: Analysis and evaluation of nursing models and theories (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.
31.
FinkR.ThompsonC. J.BonnesD. (2005). Overcoming barriers and promoting the use of research in practice. Journal of Nursing Administration, 35(3), 121-129.
32.
FowlerM. D. (1989). Ethical issues in critical care. Heart and Lung, 18(1), 97-99.
FunkS. G.ChampagneM. T.WieseR. A.TornquistE. M. (1991). BARRIERS: The barriers to research utilization scale. Applied Nursing Research, 4(1), 39-45. doi: 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80052-7
35.
GadowS. (1980). Existential advocacy: Philosophical foundations of nursing. In SpickerS.GadowS. (Eds.), Nursing images & ideals (pp. 79-101). New York: Springer Publishing.
36.
GerrishK.ClaytonJ. (2004). Promoting evidence-based practice: An organizational approach. Journal of Nursing Management, 12, 114-123. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00454.x
37.
GodkinJ. L. (2006). Making a difference: A study of patient advocacy among expert dialysis nurses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.
38.
Gosselin-AcombT. K.SchneiderS. M.ClouchR. W.VenstraB. A. (2007). Nursing advocacy in North Carolina. Oncology Nursing Forum, 34(5), 1070-1074. doi:10.1188/07.ONF.1070-1074
39.
GraceP. J. (2001). Professional advocacy: Widening the scope of accountability. Nursing Philosophy, 2(2), 151-162. doi:10.1046/j.1466-769X.2001.00048.x
40.
GranelloD. H.WheatonJ. E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82(4), 387-394.
41.
HanksR. G. (2008). The lived experience of nursing advocacy. Nursing Ethics, 15(4), 468-477. doi:10.1177/0969733008090518
42.
HanksR. G. (2010). The medical surgical nurse perspective of advocate role. Nursing Forum, 45(2), 97-107. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6198.2010.00170.x
43.
HaverkampA.ThompsonH.McFeeJ.CertuloC. (1976). The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high risk pregnancy. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 125(3), 310-320.
HeelanL. (2015). Exploring the relationships of power, attitudes regarding intermittent fetal monitoring, and perceived barriers to research utilization with a labor and delivery nurse’s attitude toward patient advocacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University.
46.
HindleyC.ThomsonA. M. (2005). The rhetoric of informed choice: Perspectives from midwives on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Health Expectations, 8, 306-314. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00355.x
International Council of Nurses. (2012). The ICN code of ethics for nurses. Retrieved from www.icn.ch
49.
JamesD. C.SimpsonK. R.KnoxG. E. (2003). How do expert nurses view their role?Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Neonatal Nursing, 32(6), 814-823. doi:10.1177/0884217503258548
KajermoK. N.BostromA. M.ThompsonD. S.HutchinsonA. M.EstabrooksC. A.WallinL. (2010). The BARRIERS scale--The barriers to research utilization scale: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 5(32). Retrieved from http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/32
52.
KennedyH. P.LyndonA. (2008). Tensions and teamwork in nursing and midwifery relationships. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Neonatal Nursing, 37, 426-435. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00256.x
53.
KimT. S. (2009). The theory of power as knowing participation in change: A literature review. Visions: The Journal for Rogerian Nursing Science, 16(1), 19-27.
54.
KohnkeM. F. (1982). Advocacy—What is it?Nursing and Health Care, 3(6), 314-318.
55.
LefeverS.DalM.MatthiasodittirA. (2007). Online data collection in academic research: Advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574-582. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638x
56.
LyndonA. (2008). Social and environmental conditions creating fluctuating agency for safety in two urban academic birth centers. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Neonatal Nursing, 37, 13-23. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00204.x
57.
McCloskeyD. J. (2008). Nurses’ perceptions of research utilization in a corporate health care system. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40(1), 39-45. doi:10.1111/j.15475069.2007.00204.x
58.
McSteenK.Peden-McAlpineC. (2006). The role of the nurse as advocate in ethically difficult care situations with dying patients. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 8(5), 259-269.
59.
MilletteB. E. (1993). Client advocacy and the moral orientation of nurses. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 15, 607-618. doi:10.1177/019394599301500507
60.
MillsJ.FieldJ.CantR. (2009). The place of knowledge and evidence in the context of Australian general practice nursing. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 6(4), 219-228. doi:10.111/wvn.2009.6.issue-4/issuetoc
61.
MishraR.ThakurR. S. (2013). A review of spam filtering and measures of antispam. Journal of Information Engineering and Application, 3(6), 11-13.
62.
Morris-DockerS. B.TodA.HarrisonJ. M.WolstenholmeD.BlackR. (2004). Nurses’ use of the Internet in clinical ward settings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(2), 157-166. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03183.x
63.
NahigianE. (2003). Factors associated with the advocacy decisions of registered professional nurses employed as staff nurses in inpatient adult care hospitals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
64.
National Institute of Clinical Excellence. (2007). Care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. Retrieved from http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG55
65.
ParahooK. (2000). Barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization among nurses in Northern Ireland. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), 89-98. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01256.x
66.
ParahooK.McCaughanE. M. (2001). Research utilization among medical and surgical nurses: A comparison of their self-reports and perceptions of barriers and facilitators. Journal of Nursing Management, 9, 21-30. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2001.00237.x10.1046/j.1365-2834.2001.00237.x
67.
PayantL.DaviesB.GrahamI. D.PetersonW. E.ClinchJ. (2008). Nurses’ intentions to provide continuous labor support to women. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Neonatal Nursing, 37, 405-414. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00257.x
68.
PenticuffJ. H.WaldenM. (2000). Influence of practice environment and nurse characteristics on perinatal nurses’ responses to ethical dilemmas. Nursing Research, 49(2), 64-72.
69.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T. (2012). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
70.
PravikoffD. S.TannerA. B.PierceS. T. (2005). Readiness of U.S. nurses for evidence-based practice: Many don’t understand or value research and have had little or no training to help them find evidence on which to base their practice. American Journal of Nursing, 105(9), 40-51.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2012). Reducing waste in health care. Health Policy Brief. Retrieved from www.healthaffairs.org
73.
RogersE. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
74.
RogersM. E. (1986). Science of unitary human beings. In MalinskiV. M. (Ed.), Explorations on Martha Rogers’ science of unitary human beings (pp. 3-9). East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
75.
RogersM. E. (1992). Nursing science and the space age. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5(27), 27-34. doi: 10.1177/089431849200500108
76.
The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstericians and Gynaecologists. (2009). Intrapartum fetal surveillance clinical guidelines. Retrieved from www.ranzcog.edu/au
SandelowskiM. (2000). Retrofitting technology to nursing: The case of electronic fetal monitoring. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatal Nursing, 29(3), 316-324. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2000.tb02053.x
79.
SmithV.BegleyC. M.ClarkeM.DevaneD. (2012). Professional views of fetal monitoring during labor: A systematic review and thematic analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12, 166. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-166
80.
TavakolM.DennickR. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
81.
ThielL.GhoshY. (2008). Determining registered nurses’ readiness for evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing, 5(4), 182-192. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00137.x
82.
ThompsonC.McCaughanD.CullumN.SheldonT. A.MulhallA.ThompsonD. (2001). The accessibility of research based knowledge for nurses in the U.K. acute care setting. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36, 11-22. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01938.x
VeeramahV. (2004). Utilization of research findings by graduate nurses and midwives. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 47(2), 183-191. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03077.x
WareL. J.BruckenthalP.DavisG. C.O’Conner-VonS. K. (2011). Factors that influence patient advocacy by pain management nurses: Results of the American Society for PainManagement Nursing survey. Pain Management Nursing, 12(1), 25-32. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2009.12.001
