Mexican American Family Processes: Nurturing,Support,and Socialization

Abstract

The purpose of this ethnographic study with Mexican American families was to document characteristics of Mexican American family processes of nurturing, support, and socialization. Audiotaped conversations with participants were transcribed verbatim in Spanish or English. Content analysis was used to derive characteristics of family processes. Family nurturing was characterized by being kin-based and intimate in nature. Family support was kin-based, with material support oriented toward household needs; with emotional support grounded in shared stories, problem solving, and prayer; and with informational support offered in consejos (wisdom sayings and words of advice), stories, and guidance. Family socialization was kin-based, hierarchical, and ritualistic.

Keywords

family nurturing family socialization family support Mexican Americans Roy’s model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bean, F. , & Tienda, M. (1987). The Hispanic population of the United States.New York: Russell Sage.

Bomar, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). Nurses and family health promotion (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

Facio, E. (1996). Understanding older Chicanas. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Friedman, M. (1992). Family nursing: Theory and practice. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.

Griswold del Castillo, R. (1984). La familia [The family]. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

Hanson, S.M.H. , & Boyd, S. (1996). Family health care nursing. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

Keefe, S. (1984). Real and ideal extended familism among Mexican American and Anglo Americans: On the meaning of “close” family ties. Human Organization, 43, 65-70.

Keefe, S. , Padilla, A. , & Carlos, M. (1979). The Mexican-American extended family as an emotional support system. Human Organization, 38, 144-152.

Levenson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Markides, K. , Boldt, J. , & Ray, L. (1986). Sources of helping and intergenerational solidarity: A three-generation study of Mexican Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 506-511.

11.

McCubbin, M. (1993). Family stress theory edge about family adaptation. In S. Feetham , S. Meister , J. Bell , & C. Gillis (Eds.), The nursing of families.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

12.

Rochelle, A. (1997). No more kin: Exploring race, class, and gender in family networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Roy, C., Sr. (1983). Roy adaptation model. In R. Clements & F. Roberts (Eds.), Family health: A theoretical approach to nursing care (pp. 255-278). New York: John Wiley.

14.

Sabogal, F. , Marín, G. , Otero-Sabogal, R. , Marín, B.V.O. , & Perez-Stable, E. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn’t. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 397-412.

15.

Sanchez, R. (1994). Chicano discourse. Houston, TX: Arte Público Press.

16.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Harcourt Brace.

18.

Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. Chicago: Rinehart and Winston. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

19.

Tedrow, M. (1991). Overview of the interdependence mode. In C. Roy, Sr. , & H. Andrews (Eds.), The Roy adaptation model (pp. 385-403). Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.

20.

U.S. Bureau of the Census . (1991). 1990 census of population and housing: Summary population and housing characteristics Texas (1990 CPH-1-45). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

21.

Vega, W. (1995). The study of Latino families: A point of departure. In R. Zambrana (Ed.), Understanding Latino families: Scholarship, policy, and practice (pp. 3-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

22.

Wright, L. , & Leahey, M. (1994). Nurses and families: A guide to family assessment and intervention. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.

23.

Zinn, M. (1982/1983). Familism among Chicanos: A theoretical review. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 10, 224-238.