This article explores the use of an audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (audio-CASI) methodology in a household survey of adolescents in two districts of Kenya. Computer software was developed as part of a research project comparing audio-CASI with traditional methods of interviewing about sensitive behaviors, including sexual initiation, risky sexual behavior, coerced sex, and drug and alcohol use. The article describes the experience of carrying out a household-based study using computers and explores the technical challenges faced by the data-collection teams. Few problems emerged with the computer hardware and software despite the difficult interviewing conditions. The adolescent respondents easily adapted to the computerized interview and were able to complete the survey with minimal assistance. However, the computers were not a completely neutral part of the data-collection process and added to problems encountered during the fieldwork in one of the districts. Unexpected findings regarding respondents’ perceptions of privacy and confidentiality were also observed.
Aquilino, W. S. (1994). Interviewmode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: Afield experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(2), 210–240.
2.
Aquilino, W. S., & Lo Scuito, L. A. (1990). Effects of interviewer mode on self-reported drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54(3), 362–395.
3.
Beebe, T. J., Harrison, P. A., Mcrae, J. A., Anderson, R. E., & Fulkerson, J. (1998). An evaluation of computer assisted self-interviews in a school setting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(4), 623–632.
4.
Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., Blair, E., Locander, W., Miles, C., Singer, E., et al. (1979). Improving interview method and questionnaire design: Response effects to threatening questions in survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., Blair, E.,& Stocking, C. (1978). Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(2), 221–234.
6.
Couper, M. P., & Nicholls, W. L., II. (1998). The history and development of computer assisted survey information collection methods. In M. P. Couper et al. (Eds.), Computer assisted survey information collection (pp. 1–22). New York: John Wiley
7.
Des Jarlais, D. C., Paone, D., Miliken, J., Turner, C. F., Miller, H., Gribble, J., et al. (1999). Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behavior for HIV among injecting drug users: A quasi-randomized trial. Lancet, 353, 1657–1661.
8.
Fu, H., Darroch, J. E., Henshaw, S.,& Kolb, E. (1998). Measuring the extent of abortion underreporting in the 1995National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives, 30(3), 128–138.
9.
Hewett, P. C., Mensch, B. S.,& Erulkar, A. S. (2003). Consistency in the reporting of sexual behavior among adolescent girls in Kenya: A comparison of interviewing methods (Policy Research Division Working paper no. 182). New York: Population Council.
10.
Jobe, J. B., Pratt, W. F., Tourangeau, R., Baldwin, A.,& Rasinski, K. (1997). Effects of interview mode on sensitive questions in a fertility survey. In L. Lyberg (Ed.), Survey measurement and process quality (pp. 311–329). New York: John Wiley.
11.
Johnson, A. M., Copas, A. J., Erens, B., Mandalia, S., Fenton, K. A., Korovessis, C., et al. (2001). Effect of computer assisted self interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviors in a general population sample: A methodological experiment. AIDS, 15, 111–115.
12.
Kyrsan, M. (1998). Privacy and the expression of White racial attitudes: Acomparison across three contexts. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(4), 506–544.
13.
Lara, D., Ellertson, C., Diaz, C.,& Strickler, J. (2001, August 18-24). Measuring the prevalence of induced abortion in Mexico City: Comparison of four methodologies. Paper presented at the 24th Population Conference of the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, Salvador de Bahia.
14.
Lloyd, C. B., Kaufman, C. E.,& Hewett, P. C. (2000). The spread of primary schooling in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for fertility change. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 483–515.
15.
Macalino, G., Celentano, D., Strathdee, S., Latkin, C., & Vlahov, D. (2002). Risk behaviors by audio computerassisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14(5), 367–378.
16.
Mensch, B. S., Hewett, P. C., & Erulkar, A. S. (2001). The reporting of sensitive behavior among adolescents: A methodological experiment in Kenya (Research Division Working Paper no. 151). New York: Population Council.
17.
Mensch, B. S., Hewett, P. C.,& Erulkar, A. S. (2003). The reporting of sensitive behavior by adolescents: A methodological experiment in Kenya. Demography, 40(2), 247-268.
18.
O’Reilly, J., Hubbard, M., Lessler, J., Biemer, P., & Turner, C. (1994). Audio and video computer assisted selfinterviewing: Preliminary tests of newtechnology for data collection. Journal of Official Statistics, 10, 197–214.
19.
Rumakom, P., Guest, P., Chinvarasopak, W., Utmarat, W.,& Sontanakanit, J. (1999). Obtaining accurate responses to sensitive questions: A comparison of two data collection techniques. Unpublished manuscript, Population Council, Bangkok, Thailand.
20.
Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 275–304.
21.
Tourangeau, R.,& Smith, T. W. (1998). Collecting sensitive informationwith different modes of data collection. In Mick P. Couper et al. (Eds.), Computer assisted survey information collection (pp. 431–453). New York: John Wiley.
22.
Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H.,& Sonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867–873.
23.
Turner, C. F., Forsyth, B. H., O’Reilly, J., Cooley, P. C., Smith, T. K., Rogers, et al. (1998). Automated selfinterviewing and the survey measurement of sensitive behaviors. In M. P. Couper, R. P. Baker, J. Bethlehem, C. Z. F. Clark, J. Martin, W. L. Nicholis, & J. M. OReilly (Eds.), Computer-assisted survey information collection (pp. 455-473). London: John Wiley.
24.
van deWijgert, J., Padian, N., Shiboski, S.,& Turner, C. (2000). Is audio computer-assisted self-interviewing a feasible method of surveying in Zimbabwe?International Journal of Epidemiology, 29, 885–890.
25.
Voeten, H., Meester, E. I., Egesah, O. B.,& Habbema, J. D. F. (2000, February 4-10). Experiences with method triangulation in a study on sexual behavior of young adults 15–29 years in Nyanza province, Kenya. Paper presented at the IUSSP Conference on Partnership Networks, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
26.
Warner, S. (1965). Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60(309), 63–69.
27.
Williams, M. L., Freeman, R. C., Brown, A. M., Zhao, Z., Elwood, W. N., Gordon, C., et al. (2000). Acomparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer assisted versus face to face interviewing. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12(3), 199–213.
