This article draws on sociological and psychological theory to explore the meaning application of deviance to behaviors observed on the Internet. First, definitions of deviancein online and offline contexts are discussed. Observations of the Internet as a so-called yet-to-be-normalized environment present a conflicting scenario for labeling emergent behaviors as deviant. The question stands as to whether devianceis an appropriate term to apply to some behavior observed on the Internet. The second section examines deviance on the Internet at a macro, cybercultural level and at a micro, communicational level using two key examples to illustrate some of the issues raised earlier in defining deviance. The sharing of mp3 files is used as an example to illustrate problems in definition at a macro level and at a microlevel; psychological approximations to normative and antinormative communication on the Net are discussed, using flaming as an example.
Adam, A. (2002). Cyberstalking and Internet pornography: Gender and the gaze. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 133-142.
2.
Aggleton, P. (1987). Deviance. London: Routledge.
3.
Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E.,& Bem, D. J. (1990). Introduction to psychology(10th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
4.
Becker, H. S. (1966). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Free Press.
5.
Box, S. (1971). Deviance, reality and society(2nd ed.). London: Holt Rinehart.
6.
Bruckman, A., Curtis, P., Figallo, C.,& Laurel, B. (1994). Approaches tomanaging deviant behavior in virtual communities. In CHI'94 conference companion on human factors in computer systems(pp. 183-184). Boston: Association for Computing Machinery.
7.
Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology: Institutionalization, diversity, and the rise of sociological research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Collins, M. (1992). Flaming: The relationship between social context cues and uninhibited verbal behavior in computer mediated communication. Retrieved November 21, 2003, from www.emoderators.com/papers/flames.html
9.
Daft, R. L.,& Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: Anewapproach to managerial behavior and organization design. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 191-233.
10.
Davies, P.,& Lipsey, Z. (2003). Ana's gone surfing: Alook at the disturbing rise of pro-anorexic websites. Psychologist, 16(8), 424-425.
11.
Denegri-Knott, J.,& Molesworth, M. (2002, July). Cyberdelinquency or electronic opportunism? Exploring young consumers' willingness to lie to and steal from companies online. Paper presented at Academy of Marketing Conference Proceedings, Nottingham, UK.
12.
Denning, D. E., & Denning, P. J. (1998). Internet besieged: Countering cyberspace scofflaws. New York: ACM Press.
13.
Denning, D. E.,& Lin. H. S. (1994). Rights and responsibilities of participants in networked communities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14.
Dibbell, J. (1993, December 21). Arape in cyberspace: Howan evil clown, aHaitian trickster spirit, two wizards and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society. Village Voice, pp. 36-42.
15.
Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A. Smith& P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace(pp. 29-59). New York: Routledge.
16.
Download. (2003). Kazaa nears download record. Retrieved September 23, 2003, from http://news.com.com/2100-1027_3-1009418.html?tag=fd_top&pid=12
17.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-McMillan. (Originalwork published 1893)
18.
Dutton, W. H. (1996). Network rules of order: Regulating speech in public electronic fora. Media, Culture, and Society, 18(2), 269-290.
19.
Dyer, R., Green, R., Pitts, M.,& Millward, M. (1995). What's the flaming problem? or computer mediated communication—Deindividuating or disinhibiting? In A. J. Dix, J. E. Finlay,& M. A. R. Kirby (Eds.), People and computers: Proceedings of HCI'95 conference(pp. 289-302). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Foucault, M. (1974). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Routledge.
21.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish.New York: Pantheon.
22.
Foucault, M. (1994). Foucault, Michel, 1926-. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault(pp. 314-319). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Gaines, S. (2001, April 26). Be very afraid, the cyber cops may be watching. Guardian. Retrieved April 30, 2001, from www.guardian.co.uk/online/story/0,3605,478258,00.html
24.
Gardrat, A. (1998). Another look at European Internet law. Media, Law, and Policy, 7(1), 27-32.
25.
Giddens, A. (2001). Sociology(4th ed.). London: Polity.
26.
Greenfield, D. N. (1999). Virtual addiction: Help for netheads, cyberfreaks, and those who love them. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
27.
Griffith, M. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLIII. Some comments on “Addictive use of the Internet” by Young. Psychological Reports, 80(1), 81-82.
28.
Heim, M. (1993). The erotic ontology of cyberspace. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First step(pp. 59-80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1978). The network nation: Human communication via computer. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30.
Joinson, A. N. (1998). Causes and implications of dis-inhibited behavior on the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), The psychology of the Internet(pp. 43-58). New York: Academic Press.
31.
Joinson, A. N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour, virtual worlds, real lives. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
32.
Jordan, T. (1999). Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the Internet. London: Routledge.
33.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
34.
Lea, M., O'Shea, T., Fung, P.,& Spears, R. (1992). Flaming in computer mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts in computer-mediated communication(pp. 89-112). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
35.
Left, S. (2002, April 24). Casting the net for pedophiles. Guardian. Retrieved April 24, 2002, from www.guardian.co.uk/internetnews/story/0,7369,689977,00.html
36.
Lemert, E. (1967). Human deviance, social problems and social control. New York: Prentice Hall.
37.
Littler, D. (1999). The impact of the Internet on the expression and perception of social identities. Retrieved June 18, 2000, from www.newmediastudies.com/resourc2.htm
38.
Man, C. C. (2003, March). The fall of the music industry. Wired, 11(2), 90-93.
39.
McLaughlin, M. L., Osborne, K. K., & Smith, C. B. (1995). Standards of conduct on Usenet. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer mediated communication and community(pp. 90-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Mehta, M. D., & Plaza, D. A. (1997). Pornography in cyberspace: An exploration of what's in USENET. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet(pp. 53-67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Moores, T., & Dhillon, G. (2000). Software piracy. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 88-93.
42.
Nguyen, D. T.,& Alexander, J. (1996). The coming of cyberspacetime and the end of the polity. In R. Shields (Ed.), Cultures of Internet: Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies(pp. 99-124). London: Sage.
43.
Pew Internet and American Life. (2003). Music downloading, file-sharing, and copyright: A Pew Internet Project data memo. Retrieved December 12, 2003, from www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Copyright_Memo.pdf
44.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341-371.
45.
Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and regression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 503-513.
46.
Reed, L. (2002). Governing (through) the Internet: The discourse of pathological computer use as mobilized knowledge. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 5(2), 131-153.
47.
Reid, E. (1999). Hierarchy and power: Social control in cyberspace. In M. A. Smith& P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace(pp. 107-134). London: Routledge.
48.
Riva, G. (2001). Communicating in CMC: Making order out of miscommunication. In L. Anolli, R. Ciceri, & G. Riva (Eds.), Say not to say: Newperspectives on miscommunication(pp. 204-230).Amsterdam: IOS Press.
49.
Robins, K. (1995). Cyberspace and the world we live in. In M. Featherstone & R. Burrows (Eds.), Cyberspace, cyberbodies, cyberpunks(pp. 135-155). London: Sage.
50.
Rock, P. (1973). Deviant behavior. London: Hutchinson University Library.
51.
Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1984). Social support: Theory, research, and application. The Hague, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhof.
52.
Schuen, L. A. (2001). Deviant behavior on the Internet. Retrieved October 3, 2002, from www.weim.com.my/PDF-Mainsite/deviance.pdf
53.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
54.
Siegal, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire, T. (1986). Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
55.
Smilowitz, M., Compton, D. C.,& Flint, L. (1988). The effects of computermediated communication on an individual's judgment: A study based on the methods of Asch's social influence experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 311-321.
56.
Smith, C. B., McLaughlin, M. L., & Osborne, K. K. (1998). From terminal ineptitude to virtual sociopathy: How conduct is regulated on Usenet. In F. Sudweeks, M. L. McLaughlin, & S. Rafaeli (Eds.), Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the Internet(pp. 95-112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57.
Smolensky, M. W., Carmody, M. A., & Halcomb, C. G. (1990). The influence of task type, group structure and extraversion on uninhibited speech in CMC. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 261-272.
58.
Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts in computer-mediated communication(pp. 20-64). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
59.
Spears, R., Lea, M., & Postmes, T. (2001). Social psychological theories of computer mediated communication: Social pain or social gain? In P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The handbook of language and social psychology(pp. 601-623). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
60.
Sproull, L.,& Faraj, S. (1997). Atheism, sex, and databases: The net as a social technology. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet(pp. 35-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 492-512.
62.
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
Steele, G. L. (1983). The hacker's dictionary. New York: Harper & Row.
64.
Sternberg, J. (2000). Virtual misbehaviour: Breaking rules of conduct in online environments. Proceedings of the Media Ecology Association, 1, 53-60.
65.
Stivale, C. J. (1996). Cybertime. In L. Strate, R. Jacobson, & S. B. Gibson (Eds.), Internet culture(pp. 133-144). New York: Routledge.
66.
Suler, J. (1999). The psychology of cyberspace. Retrieved January 30, 2004, from www.rider.edu/users/suler/psycyber/psycyber.html
67.
Tidwell, L., & Walther, J. (2002). CMC effects on disclosure, impressions and interpersonal evaluations. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 317-348.
68.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Touchstone.
69.
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction: Arelational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
70.
Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. K., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21, 460-487.
71.
Weckowicz, T. E. (1984). Models of mental illness. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
72.
Williams, M. (2000). Virtually criminal: Discourse, deviance, and anxiety within virtual communities. International Review of Law, Computers, and Technology, 14(1), 95-105.
73.
Wynn, E.,& Katz, J. E. (1997). Hyperbole over cyberspace: Self presentation and social boundaries in Internet home pages and discourse. Information Society, 13(4), 297-328.
74.
Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: John Wiley.
75.
Zugelder, M. T., Flaherty, T. B.,& Johnson, J. P. (2000). Legal issues associated with international Internet marketing. International Marketing Review, 17(3), 253-271.
