This article examines the political uses of social networking (SN) Web sites by young adults in context of the early stages of the 2008 presidential primary season. Using a survey of over 3,500 18- to 24-year-olds contacted immediately prior to the Iowa caucuses, we illustrate that although SN Web sites are recognized by youth as a possible source of news and that many receive some of their news from these sites, the types of news gathered probably do little to inform them or add to democratic discourse. Moreover, the study shows that in spite of the promise SN sites hold for increasing political interest and participation among a chronically disengaged cohort, users are no more inclined to participate in politics than are users of other media.
Bauerlein, M. ( 2008). The dumbest generation. New York: Tarcher Penguin.
2.
Baum, M.A. ( 2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review , 96, 91-109.
3.
Baum, M.A. ( 2003a). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
4.
Baum, M.A. ( 2003b). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence? Political Communication, 20, 173-190.
5.
Baum, M.A., & Jamison, A.S. ( 2006). The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently. The Journal of Politics, 68, 946-959.
6.
Baumgartner, J., & Francia, P.L. ( 2008). Conventional wisdom and American elections: Exploding myths, exploring misconceptions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
Boyd, D. ( 2008). Can social networking sites enable political action. In A. Fine, M. Sifry, A. Raseij, & J. Levi (Eds.), Rebooting democracy. New York: Personal Democracy.
8.
Bucy, E.P., & Gregson, K.S. ( 2001). Media participation: A legitimizing mechanism of mass democracy. New Media & Society, 3, 359-382.
9.
Calavita, M. ( 2005). Apprehending politics: News media and individual political development. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
10.
Corrado, A. ( 1996). Elections in cyberspace: Prospects and problems. In A. Corrado, & C. M. Firestone (Eds.), Elections in cyberspace: Toward a new era in American politics. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
11.
Curry, T. ( 2008). Young voters not essential to Obama win. MSNBC.com. Retrieved November 7, 2008, from http://http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27582147/
12.
Dalton, R.J. ( 2008). The good citizen. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
13.
Davis, R. ( 1999). The web of politics: The Internet’s impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University.
14.
Davis, R. ( 2005). Politics online: Blogs, chatrooms, and discussion groups in American democracy. New York: Routledge.
15.
Davis, R., & Owen, D. ( 1998). The new media and American politics. New York: Oxford University.
16.
Graber, D.A. ( 2001). Processing politics. Chicago: University of Chicago.
17.
Graber, D.A. ( 2006). Mass media & American politics (7th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
18.
Grossman, L.K. ( 1999). The electronic republic. In R. E. Heibert (Ed.), Impact of mass media: Current issues . New York: Longman.
19.
Gueorguieva, V. ( 2008). Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 288-300.
20.
Hollander, B.A. ( 1995). The new news and the 1992 presidential campaign: Perceived versus actual political knowledge. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 786-798.
21.
Johnson, T.J., & Kaye, B.K. ( 2003). A boost or bust for democracy? How the web influenced political attitudes and behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 presidential elections . Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8, 9-34.
22.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. ( 1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social investment and psychological well-being? American Psychologist , 53, 1017-1031.
23.
Lin, C., Salwen, M.B., & Abdulla, R.A. ( 2005). Uses and gratification of online and offline news: New wine in old bottles? In M. B. Salwen, B. Garrison, & P. D. Driscoll (Eds.), Online news and the public. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. ( 2000). Politics as usual: The cyberspace ‘‘revolution’’ . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
Mindich, D.T.Z. ( 2005). Tuned out. New York: Oxford University.
26.
Nie, N. ( 2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist , 45, 420-435.
27.
Norris, P., & Jones, D. ( 1998). Virtual democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3, 1-4.
28.
Page, B.I., & Shapiro, R.Y. ( 1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in American policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago.
29.
Pew Research Center. (2006). The cell phone challenge to survey research. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=276
30.
Pew Research Center. (2007). Modest interest in 2008 campaign news. Retrieved October 23, 2007, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=364
31.
Pew Research Center. (2008). Internet’s broader role in campaign 2008: Social networking and online videos take off. Retrieved May 11, 2008, from http://people-press.org/report/384/internets-broader-role-in-campaign-2008
32.
Popkin, S.L. ( 1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago.
33.
Prior, M. ( 2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49, 577-592.
34.
Putnam, R.D. ( 2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community . New York: Simon & Schuster .
35.
Robinson, J.P., Kestnbaum, M., Neustadtl, A., & Alvarez, A. ( 2000). Mass media use and social life among Internet users. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 490-501.
Sears, D.O. ( 1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influence of a narrow data base on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
38.
Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Kwak, N. ( 2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research , 32, 531-565.
39.
Shah, D.V., Kwak, N., & Holbert, R.L. ( 2001). Connecting and disconnecting with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political Communication, 18, 141-162.
40.
Sunstein, C. ( 2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
41.
Swanson, D.L. ( 1987). Gratification seeking, media exposure, and audience interpretation: Some directions for research. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31, 237-254.
42.
Twenge, J.M. ( 2006). Generation me. New York: Free.
43.
Wattenberg, M.P. ( 2007). Is voting for young people?New York : Pearson Longman.
44.
Whillock, R.K. ( 1997). Cyber-politics: The online strategies of ’96. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 208-225.
45.
Williams, C.B., & Gulati, G.J. ( 2007). Social networks in political campaigns: Facebook and the 2006 midterm elections. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 30-September 2, 2007.
46.
Zillman, D. ( 1985). The experimental explorations of gratifications from media entertainment. In D. Zillman & J. Bryant (Eds.), Selective exposure and communication . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
Zillman, D., & Bryant, J. ( 1985). Selective exposure and communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M.X. (2006). A new engagement?New York: Oxford University.
