Sex Differences in the Expression and Use of Computer-Mediated Affective Language

Abstract

Although women have been stereotyped as more emotionally expressive than men, the extant empirical evidence on sex differences in the expression and use of affective communication is equivocal. The authors examined the influence of sex and context on the expression and use of computer-mediated affective language in a sample of young adults. A total of 56 undergraduates (28 males, 28 females) were paired in same-sex dyads and randomly assigned to either a webcam or no webcam condition. The participants engaged in a 10-min free chat online conversation in the laboratory. Transcripts were objectively coded for the use of affective communication and traditional linguistic and conversational style measures. The analyses revealed separate significant Sex × Webcam Condition interactions on the affective quality of language used and the expression of computer-mediated emotion. Men in the webcam condition used significantly less active words than men in the no webcam condition and less than women in the webcam condition. Women in the webcam condition used significantly more emoticons than women in the no webcam condition or men in either condition. Men and women did not differ in their use of emoticons in the no webcam condition. Results suggest that sex differences in the use and expression of computer-mediated affective communication are context specific in an undergraduate sample. Findings are discussed in terms of their larger implications for understanding sex differences in the expression and use of emotion in face-to-face (FTF) social interactions.

Keywords

sex differences computer-mediated communication anonymity emotion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Athenstaedt, U. , Haas, E. , Schwab, S. ( 2004). Gender role self-concept and gender-typed communication behavior in mixed-sex and same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 50, 37-52.

Blier, M.J. , & Blier-Wilson, L.A. (1989). Gender differences in self-rated emotional expressiveness. Sex Roles, 21, 287-295.

Brunet, P.M. , & Schmidt, L.A. ( 2007). Is shyness context specific? Relation between shyness and online self-disclosure with and without a live webcam in young adults . Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 938-945.

Brunet, P.M. , & Schmidt, L.A. ( 2008). Are shy adults ‘‘really’’ bolder online? It depends on the context. CyberPsychology & Behavior , 11, 707-709.

Burleson, B.R. , Holmstrom, A.J. , & Gilstrap, C.M. (2005). ‘‘Guys can’t say that to guys’’: Four experiments assessing the normative motivation account for deficiencies in the emotional support provided by men. Communication Monographs, 72, 468-501.

Cook, W.L. , & Kenny, D.A. ( 2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of directional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 101-109.

Derks, D. , Fischer, A.H. , & Bos, A.E.R. (2008). The role of emotions in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computer in Human Behavior, 24, 766-785.

Dindia, K. , & Allen, M. ( 1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106-124.

Dosser, D.A. , Balswick, J.O. , & Halverson, C.F. (1983). Situational context of emotional expressiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 30, 375-387.

10.

Fitzpatrick, M.A. , Mulac, A. , & Dindia, K. ( 1995). Gender-preferential language use in spouse and stranger interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 18-39.

11.

Gray, J. ( 1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships . New York: Harper Collins.

12.

Gross, J.J. , & John, O.P. ( 1998). Mapping the domain of expressivity: Multimethod evidence for a hierarchical model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 170-191.

13.

Highlen, P.S. , & Gillis, S.F. ( 1978). Effects of situational factors, sex, and attitude on affective self-disclosure and anxiety. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 270-276.

14.

Highlen, P.S. , & Johnston, B. ( 1979). Effects of situational variables on affective self-disclosure with acquaintances. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 26, 255-258.

15.

Huffaker, D.A. , & Calvert, S.L. ( 2005). Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10. Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html

16.

James, D. , & Drakich, J. ( 1993). Understanding gender differences in amount of talk: A critical review of research. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction (pp. 281-312). New York: Oxford University Press.

17.

Jansen, E. ( 2005). Acronyms & text messaging. Retrieved January 15, 2005, from http://www.netlingo.com/emailsh.cfm

18.

Joinson, A.N. ( 2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.

19.

Kenny, D.A. ( 2004). Dyadic analysis. Retrieved November 11, 2005, from http://davidakenny.net/ dyad.htm

20.

LaFrance, M. , Hecht, M.A. , & Levy Paluck, E. (2003). The contingent smile: A meta-analysis of sex differences in smiling. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 305-334.

21.

Leaper, C. , Carson, M. , Baker, C. , Holliday, H. , & Myers, S. ( 1995). Self-disclosure and listener verbal support in same-gender and cross-gender friends’ conversations. Sex Roles, 33, 387-404.

22.

Leaper, C. , & Smith, T.A. ( 2004). A meta-analysis review of gender variations in children’s language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Developmental Psychology, 40, 993-1027.

23.

Little, T.D. , & Card, N.A. ( 2005). On the use of social relations and actor-partner interdependence models in developmental research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 173-179.

24.

Mulac, A. , Incontro, C.R. , & James, M.R. ( 1985). Comparison of the gender-linked language effect and sex role stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49, 1098-1109.

25.

O’Kearney, R. , & Dadds, M. ( 2004). Developmental and gender differences in language for emotions across the adolescent years. Cognition & Emotion , 18, 913-938.

26.

Roberts, L.D. , Smith, L.M. , & Pollock, C.M. ( 2000). U r a lot bolder on the net. In W. R. Crozier (Ed.), Shyness, development, consolidation, and change (pp. 121-138). Boston: McGraw-Hill .

27.

Sweeney, K. , & Whissell, C. ( 1984). A dictionary of affect in language: I. Establishment and preliminary validation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 695-698.

28.

Tannen, D. ( 1996). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.

29.

Thomson, R. ( 2006). The effects of topic of discussion on gendered language in computer-mediated communication discussion. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 25, 167-178.

30.

Whissell, C. ( 1999). Phonosymbolism and the emotional nature of sounds: Evidence of the preferential use of particular phonemes in texts of differing emotional tone. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89, 19-48.

31.

Whissell, C. , & Charuk, K. ( 1985). A dictionary of affect in language: II. Word inclusion and additional validation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 65-66.

32.

Whissell, C. , & Chellew, G. ( 1994). The position of sex-typical words in two-dimensional emotion space. Psychological Reports, 74, 3-11.

33.

Whissell, C.M. , Fournier, M. , Pelland, R. , & Werr, D. ( 1986). A dictionary of affect in language: IV. Reliability, validity, and applications. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 875-888.

34.

Witmer, D. , & Katzman, S.L. ( 1997). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 2. Retrieved June 5, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/witmer1.html