In this article, the authors investigate whether and how young people combine online and offline civic activities in modes of participation. The authors discuss four participation modes in which online and offline activities may converge: Politics, Activism, Consumption, and Sharing. Applying confirmatory factor analysis to survey data about the civic participation among Dutch youth (aged 15−25 years; N = 808), the authors find that online and offline activities are combined in the Politics, Activism, and Sharing modes, and that these three modes correlate significantly with each other. Conversely, the Consumption mode can only be validated as a separate offline participation mode. The results confirm the conclusion of previous studies that youth’s participation patterns are relatively dependent of mode, and add that their participation is concurrently relatively independent of place (offline vs. online).
BäckH.TeorellJ.WestholmA. (2004). Explaining modes of participation: An evaluation of alternative theoretical models. Paper presented at ECPR 2004, Uppsala, Sweden.
2.
BakardjievaM. (2010). The Internet and subactivism: Cultivating young citizenship in everyday life. In OlssonT.DahlgrenP. (Eds.), Young people, ICTs and democracy (pp. 129–146). Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom.
3.
BanajiS.BuckinghamD.Van ZoonenL.HirzallaF. (2009). CivicWeb—Synthesis of results and policy outcomes. Retrieved December 12, 2009, fromhttp://www.civicweb.eu.
4.
BessantJ. (2004). Mixed messages: Youth participation and democratic practice. Australian Journal of Political Science, 39, 387–404.
5.
BoothJ.RichardP. (1996). Repression, participation and democratic norms in urban Central America. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 1205–1232.
6.
CalendaD.MeijerA. (2009). Young people, the Internet and political participation. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 879–898.
7.
CalendaD.MoscaL. (2007). The political use of the Internet. Some insights of two surveys of Italian students. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 29–47.
FarthingR. (2010). The politics of youthful antipolitics: Representing the ‘issue’ of youth participation in politics. Journal of Youth Studies, 13, 181–195.
22.
FernándezE.GarcíaF. (2008). Rethinking the sources of participation: A case study of Spain. European Sociological Review, 24, 479–473.
23.
FowlerJ.KamC. (2006). Patience as a political virtue: Delayed gratification and turnout. Political Behavior, 28, 113–128.
24.
GibsonR.LusoliW.WardS. (2005). Online participation in the UK: Testing a ‘contextualised’ model of Internet effects. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7, 561–583.
25.
GrahamT. (2009). What’s Wife Swap got to do with it? Talking politics in the net-based public sphere(Doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
26.
HabermasJ. (1962; English translation 1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
HasteH.HoganA. (2006). Beyond conventional civic participation, beyond the moral-political divide: Young people and contemporary debates about citizenship. Journal of Moral Education, 35, 473–493.
28.
HaythornthwaiteC.WellmanB. (2002). The Internet in everyday life: An introduction In
WellmanB.HaythornthwaiteC. (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 3–44). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
29.
HirzallaF. (2007). The Internet and democracy: Participation, citizens and politics. Javnost/the Public, 14, 83–96.
30.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
KannM.BerryJ.GrantC.ZagerP. (2007). The Internet and youth political participation. First Monday, 12. Retrieved May 10, 2009, fromhttp://www.firstmonday.org.
32.
KenskiK.StroudN. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 173–192.
33.
LivingstoneS. (2007). The challenge of engaging youth online: Contrasting producers' and teenagers' interpretations of websites. European Journal of Communication, 22, 165–181.
34.
MaddenM.RainieL. (2003). America's online pursuits. The changing picture of who's online and what they do. Washington, DC: The Pew Internet & American Life Project.
35.
MannC.StewartF. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London, England: SAGE.
36.
MichelettiM.FollesdalA.StolleD. (2003). Politics, products, and markets. Exploring political consumerism past and present. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
37.
NorrisP. (2003). Young people & political activism: From the politics of loyalties to the politics of choice?Retrieved November 10, 2008, from,http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/.
38.
OlssonT. (2008). For activists, for potential voters, for consumers: Three modes of producing the civic web. Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 497–512.
39.
ParryG.MoyserG.DayN. (1992). Political participation and democracy in Britain. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
40.
PasekJ.KenskiK.RomerD.JamiesonK. H. (2006). America’s youth and community engagement. How use of mass media is related to civic activity and political awareness in 14- to 22-year-olds. Communication Research, 33, 115–135.
41.
PattieC.SeydP.WhiteleyP. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies, 51, 443–468.
42.
PolatR. (2005). The Internet and political participation: Exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication, 20, 435–459.
43.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American democracy. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
44.
QuintelierE. (2007). Differences in political participation between young and old people. Contemporary Politics, 13, 165–180.
45.
QuintelierE.VissersS. (2008). The effect of Internet use on political participation: An analysis of survey results for 16-year olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 411–427.
46.
ReekensT.QuintelierE.BillietJ. (2009, January 16-17). Assessing the cross-cultural equivalence of political participation in the European Social Survey. Paper presented at the Cinefogo WP11 Workshop, The Hague, The Netherlands.
47.
ScheufeleD. A.NisbetM. C. (2002). Being a citizen online: New opportunities and dead ends. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7, 55–75.
48.
SchiffersS.LusoliW.WardS. (2009). What’s the story …? Online news consumption in the 2005 UK election. Northern Lights, 7, 51–72.
49.
SchönbachK.De WaalE.LaufE. (2005). Online newspapers: A substitute or complement for print newspapers and other information channels. Communications, 30, 55–72.
50.
ShahD.ChoJ.EvelandW.KwakN. (2006). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects in civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531–565.
51.
SherrodL. (Ed.). (2009). Youth activism: An international encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
VerbaS.NieN. (1972). Participation in America: Social equality and political democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
55.
VerbaS.NieN.KimJ. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
56.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK.BradyH. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
WardJ. (2008). Youth, citizenship and online political communication. Enschede, The Netherlands: Print Partners Ipskamp.
58.
WellmanB.Quan HaaseA.WitteJ.HamptonK. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 3, 436–455.
59.
ZukinC.KeeterS.AndolinaM.JenkinsK.Delli CarpiniM. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
