Online trolling behavior is becoming prevalent and has received increasing attention. Although few qualitative studies demonstrated that victims of online trolling are more likely to troll others, quantitative evidence examining such a phenomenon is lacking. Drawing on the general aggression model, this study aimed to investigate how trolling victimization affects reactive trolling behaviors and the roles of two motivations (i.e., revenge and social recognition) and online disinhibition during the process. Results from an online survey in China (N = 626) showed that online trolling victimization was positively associated with online reactive trolling and this relationship was mediated by revenge and social recognition motivations. Additionally, the indirect effect of trolling victimization on reactive trolling via revenge motivation was more pronounced when individuals had higher levels of online disinhibition. The findings of the study extend the existing literature on online trolling and provide insights into the mitigation of online trolling behaviors.
AkinwandeM. O.DikkoH. G.SamsonA. (2015). Variance inflation factor: As a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable (s) in regression analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 05(07), 754–767. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57075
AndersonC. A.HuesmannL. R. (2003). Human aggression: A social cognitive view. In HoggM.CooperJ. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 296–323). Sage Publications.
5.
AngR. P.HuanV. S.FlorellD. (2014). Understanding the relationship between proactive and reactive aggression, and cyberbullying across United States and Singapore adolescent samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505149
BennettJ. B. (1988). Power and influence as distinct personality traits: Development and validation of a psychometric measure. Journal of Research in Personality, 22(3), 361–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(88)90036-0
8.
BishopJ. (2014). Representations of ‘trolls’ in mass media communication: A review of media-texts and moral panics relating to ‘internet trolling. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 10(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwbc.2014.058384
9.
BoultonM. J. (2013). Associations between adults' recalled childhood bullying victimization, current social anxiety, coping, and self-blame: Evidence for moderation and indirect effects. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 26(3), 270–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2012.662499
10.
BrettJ. M.OlekalnsM.FriedmanR.GoatesN.AndersonC.LiscoC. C. (2007). Sticks and stones: Language, face, and online dispute resolution. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24161853
11.
BrownP.LevinsonS. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrubakerP. J.MontezD.ChurchS. H. (2021). The power of schadenfreude: Predicting behaviors and perceptions of trolling among Reddit users. Social Media + Society, 7(2), Article 205630512110213. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021382
13.
BuckelsE. E.TrapnellP. D.PaulhusD. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016.
14.
CalveteE.OrueI.EstévezA.VillardónL.PadillaP. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors’ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1128–1135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.017
15.
CamachoA.Ortega-RuizR.RomeraE. M. (2021). Longitudinal associations between cybervictimization, anger rumination, and cyberaggression. Aggressive Behavior, 47(3), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21958
16.
CamodecaM.GoossensF. A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00347.x
17.
ChenG.LuS. (2017). Online political discourse: Exploring differences in effects of civil and uncivil disagreement in news website comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(1), 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1273922
18.
ChoiB.ParkS. (2021). Bullying perpetration, victimization, and low self-esteem: Examining their relationship over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 50(4), 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-020-01379-8
19.
CitronD. K. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Harvard University Press.
CoeK.KenskiK.RainsS. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
22.
ColesB. A.WestM. (2016). Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.070
23.
CookC.SchaafsmaJ.AntheunisM. (2018). Under the bridge: An in-depth examination of online trolling in the gaming context. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3323–3340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817748578
24.
CookC. L.SchaafsmaJ.AntheunisM. L.ShahidS.LinJ. H. T.NijtmansH. W. (2021). Trolls without borders: A cross-cultural examination of victim reactions to verbal and silent aggression online. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 549955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.549955
25.
DeMarsicoD.BounouaN.MiglinR.SadehN. (2022). Aggression in the digital era: Assessing the validity of the cyber motivations for aggression and deviance scale. Assessment, 29(4), 764–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191121990088
26.
DemsarV.Brace-GovanJ.JackG.SandsS. (2021). The social phenomenon of trolling: Understanding the discourse and social practices of online provocation. Journal of Marketing Management, 37(11-12), 1058–1090. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2021.1900335
27.
DeWallC. N.AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2011). The general aggression model: Theoretical extensions to violence. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023842
28.
DodgeK. A.CoieJ. D.PettitG. S.PriceJ. M. (1990). Peer status and aggression in boys’ groups: Developmental and contextual analyses. Child Development, 61(5), 1289–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02862.x
29.
DooleyJ. J.PyżalskiJ.CrossD. (2009). Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and conceptual review. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.182
30.
FulantelliG.TaibiD.ScifoL.SchwarzeV.EimlerS. C. (2022). Cyberbullying and cyberhate as two interlinked instances of cyber-aggression in adolescence: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 909299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909299
31.
FungA. L. C. (2021). Sex differences in the relationships between forms of peer victimization and reactive and proactive aggression in schoolchildren. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5443. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105443
32.
FungA. L. C.TsangE. Y. H.ZhouG.LowA. Y. T.HoM. Y.LamB. Y. H. (2019). Relationship between peer victimization and reactive–proactive aggression in school children. Psychology of Violence, 9(3), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000125
33.
FurianL.MarchE. (2023). Trolling, the Dark Tetrad, and the four-facet spectrum of narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 208, Article 112169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112169
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.
36.
Golf-PapezM.VeerE. (2017). Don’t feed the trolling: Rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(15-16), 1336–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2017.1383298
37.
GrafD.YanagidaT.RunionsK.SpielC. (2022). Why did you do that? Differential types of aggression in offline and in cyberbullying. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, Article 107107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107107
38.
GriggD. W. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 20(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1375/ajgc.20.2.143
39.
HardakerC. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011
40.
Hilvert-BruceZ.NeillJ. T. (2020). I’m just trolling: The role of normative beliefs in aggressive behaviour in online gaming. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.003
41.
HuesmannL. R.GuerraN. G. (1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 408–419. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.2.408
42.
HwangK. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944–974. https://doi.org/10.1086/228588
43.
KimH. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52–54. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
44.
KimS.LeeY. (2020). Role of self-esteem and family-level social capital in the pathway from victimization to aggression. Child Abuse & Neglect, 107, Article 104620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104620
45.
LamarcheV.BrendgenM.BoivinM.VitaroF.DionneG.PérusseD. (2007). Do friends’ characteristics moderate the prospective links between peer victimization and reactive and proactive aggression?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(4), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9122-7
46.
MaoY.XuT.KimK. J. (2023). Motivations for proactive and reactive trolling on social media: Developing and validating a four-factor model. Social Media + Society, 9(4), Article 20563051231203682. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231203682
47.
MarchE. (2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the Internet Troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.001
48.
MarchE.MarringtonJ. (2019). A qualitative analysis of internet trolling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0210
49.
MarchE.SteeleG. (2020). High esteem and hurting others online: Trait sadism moderates the relationship between self-esteem and internet trolling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(7), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0652
50.
MarringtonJ. Z.MarchE.MurrayS.JeffriesC.MachinT.MarchS. (2023). An exploration of trolling behaviours in Australian adolescents: An online survey. PLoS One, 18(4), Article e0284378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284378
51.
NgY. L.SongY.KwonK. H.HuangY. (2020). Toward an integrative model for online incivility research: A review and synthesis of empirical studies on the antecedents and consequences of uncivil discussions online. Telematics and Informatics, 47, Article 101323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101323
52.
OhlssonI. M.IrelandJ. L. (2011). Aggression and offence motivation in prisoners: Exploring the components of motivation in an adult male sample. Aggressive Behavior, 37(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20386
53.
ÖzdemirY. (2014). Cyber victimization and adolescent self-esteem: The role of communication with parents. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 17(4), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12070
54.
Quintana-OrtsC.ReyL.Chamizo-NietoM. T.WorthingtonE. L.Jr. (2020). A serial mediation model of the relationship between cybervictimization and cyberaggression: The role of stress and unforgiveness motivations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(21), 7966. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217966
55.
RaineA.DodgeK.LoeberR.Gatzke-KoppL.LynamD.ReynoldsC.Stouthamer-LoeberM.LiuJ. (2006). The reactive–proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20115
56.
RodhamK.BrewerH.MistralW.StallardP. (2006). Adolescents’ perception of risk and challenge: A qualitative study. Journal of Adolescence, 29(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.05.012
57.
RunionsK. C. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 751–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9936-2
58.
RunionsK. C.BakM.ShawT. (2017). Disentangling functions of online aggression: The cyber-aggression typology questionnaire (CATQ). Aggressive Behavior, 43(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21663
59.
RyanR. M.SheldonK. M.KasserT.DeciE. L. (1996). All goals are not created equal: An organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation. In GollwitzerP. M.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 7–26). Guildford Press.
SantosI. L.PimentelC. E.MarianoT. E. (2023). Online trolling: The impact of antisocial online content, social media use, and gender. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1416–1429. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211055705
62.
ShapkaJ. D.LawD. M. (2013). Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9928-2
63.
ShapkaJ. D.MaghsoudiR. (2017). Examining the validity and reliability of the cyber-aggression and cyber-victimization scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.015
64.
ShuY.LuoZ. (2021). Peer victimization and reactive aggression in junior high-school students: A moderated mediation model of retaliatory normative beliefs and self-perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 47(5), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21982
65.
SindermannC.LuoR.ZhaoZ.LiQ.LiM.KendrickK. M.PankseppJ.MontagC. (2018). High ANGER and low agreeableness predict vengefulness in German and Chinese participants. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.004
66.
SmithP. K.MahdaviJ.CarvalhoM.FisherS.RussellS.TippettN. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
67.
SuL. Y. F.XenosM. A.RoseK. M.WirzC.ScheufeleD. A.BrossardD. (2018). Uncivil and personal? Comparing patterns of incivility in comments on the Facebook pages of news outlets. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3678–3699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818757205
SunL. H.FichmanP. (2020). The collective trolling lifecycle. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(7), 770–783. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24296
70.
TanrikuluI.Erdur-BakerÖ. (2021). Motives behind cyberbullying perpetration: A test of uses and gratifications theory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13-14), NP6699–NP6724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518819882
71.
ThackerS.GriffithsM. D. (2012). An exploratory study of trolling in online video gaming. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 2(4), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2012100102
TianX.GuoY. (2021). An online acquaintance community: The emergence of Chinese virtual civility. Symbolic Interaction, 44(4), 771–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.537
74.
UdrisR. (2014). Cyberbullying among high school students in Japan: Development and validation of the Online Disinhibition Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.036
75.
VerbalyteM.KeitelC.HowardK. (2022). Online trolls: Unaffectionate psychopaths or just lonely outcasts and angry partisans?Politics and Governance, 10(4), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5790
76.
WachsS.WrightM. F. (2019). The moderation of online disinhibition and sex on the relationship between online hate victimization and perpetration. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(5), 300–306. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0551
77.
WangX.QiaoY.LiW.DongW. (2022). How is online disinhibition related to adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration? Empathy and gender as moderators. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(5), 704–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316211064515
WilsonN. C.Seigfried-SpellarK. C. (2023). Cybervictimization, social, and financial strains influence internet trolling behaviors: A general strain theory perspective. Social Science Computer Review, 41(3), 967–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211065868
80.
WrightM. F. (2015). Cyber victimization and perceived stress: Linkages to late adolescents’ cyber aggression and psychological functioning. Youth & Society, 47(6), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x14537088
81.
WuB.XiaoY.ZhouL.LiF.LiuM. (2023). Why individuals with psychopathy and moral disengagement are more likely to engage in online trolling? The online disinhibition effect. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 45(2), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-023-10028-w
82.
YangJ.WangN.GaoL.WangX. (2021). Deviant peer affiliation and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: Online disinhibition and perceived social support as moderators. Children and Youth Services Review, 127, Article 106066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106066
83.
ZhanJ.YangY.LianR. (2022). The relationship between cyberbullying victimization and cyberbullying perpetration: The role of social responsibility. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 995937. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.995937
