The public access electronic bulletin board is a medium which serves middle-sized audiences. It is a growing medium both in terms of audience size and in proliferation of outlets. Its public image has been charged with a mix of exaggerations. The present paper argues that the medium and its audiences deserve an investigation that precedes assumptions of positive or negative massive effects. Instead, its special participative and interactive nature prescribes a uses-and-gratifications approach to the study of motivations and actual use. In a survey of the participants in one such electronic bulletin board the findings paint a picture of quite extensive use, usually carried out for purposes other than those emphasized by either pessimists or optimists. The role of Ludenic (or play) motivation and behavior is given special attention in the context of studying the use of this computerized application as a medium.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Compuserve Update - Consumer Information Services , Columbus OH: Compuserve, May 1983.
2.
Carey, J.W. and Quirk, J.J. "The History of the Future," in Gerbner , Gross and Melody (eds.) Communication Technology and Social Policy , New York: John Wiley and Sons , 1973.
3.
Danowski, J.A. "A Network-Based Content Analysis Methodology for Computer-Mediated Communication: An Illustration with a Computer Bulletin Board," paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Boston, 1982.
4.
Dozier, D.M. and R.E. Rice, "Rival Theories of Electronic News-reading," in Rice and associates (eds.) The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, Beverly Hills : Sage, 1984, pp. 103-127.
5.
Dutton, W.H., P. Kovaric, and C. Steinfield, "Computing in the Home: A Research Paradigm," Computers and the Social Sciences, 1 (1985 ), 5-17.
6.
Dutton, W.H. and K.L. Kraemer, Modelling as Negotiating. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1985.
7.
Etzioni, A.Minerva: An Electronic Town Hall, Policy Sciences , 3 (1972), 457-474.
8.
Ferris, M. "Romance a la Modem," Softtalk for the IBM Personal Computer, 1 (February, 1983), 58-64.
9.
Garramone, G.M., A.C. Harris, and R. Anderson, "Uses of Political Computer Bulletin Boards," Paper presented at the Political Communication Division of the International Communication Association, Honolulu, May 1985.
10.
Glossbrenner, A.The Complete Handbook of Personal Computer Communications: Everything You Need to Know to Go On-line with The World. New York : St. Martin's Press, 1983.
11.
Hiltz, S.R. and M. Turoff, "The Evolution of User Behavior in a Computerized Conferencing System ," Communications of the ACM, 24:11, (November 1981), 739-751.
12.
Hiltz, S.R., and M. Turoff, "Disinhibition, Deindividuation, and Group Process in Computerized Conferences: A Field Experiment." Paper presented to the Human Communication Technology Special Interest Group of the International Communication Association, Honolulu, May 1985.
13.
Johansen, R., J. Vallee, and K. Spangler, Electronic Meetings Technical Alternatives and Social ChoicesMenlo Park: Addison-Wesley, 1979 .
14.
Katz, E., J.G. Blumler and M. Gurevitch, "Utilization of Mass Communication by the Individual," The Uses of Mass Communication—Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research." Beverly Hills: Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research, 3, (1974), 19-34.
15.
Katz, E., M. Gurevitch and H. Haas, "On the Use of Mass Media for Important Things," American Sociological Review, 38 (1973), 164-181.
16.
Kerr, E. and S.R. Hiltz, Computer Mediated Communication Systems. New York : Academic Press, 1982.
17.
Kiesler, S., J. Siegel, and T.W. McGuire, "Does it Matter if You're Not at All There? Social Psychology of Computer Mediated Groups." Unpublished Manuscript, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1982.
18.
Manning, R. "Heavy Usage is Their Top Problem," Plumb Probing the World of Personal Telecommuications, September 1985, 1-4.
19.
McLeod, J.M. and L.B. Becker, "Testing the Validity of Gratification Measures Through Political Effects Analysis," in Katz et al. (eds.) The Uses of Mass Communication, Current Perspectives on Gmtifications Research , Beverly Hills: Sage, 1974.
20.
McLuhan, M.Understanding Media, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
21.
Paisley, W. "Computerizing Information, Lessons of a VideoText Trial," Journal of Communication, 33:1 (Winter 1983), 153-161.
22.
Palmgreen, P., L.A. Wenner, and J.D. Rayburn, "Relations Between Gratifications Sought and Obtained," Communication Research, 7 (1980 ), 161-162.
23.
Panko, R.R. "The Outlook for Computer Mail," Telecommunications Policy, June 1977.
24.
Pava, C.Managing New Office Technology An Organizational Strategy. New York: Free Press, 1983.
25.
Plumb: Probing the World of Telecommunications, 1984. "The Hacker Papers," Psychology Today, 14:3 (August 1980), 62-69.
26.
Rice, R.E. and associates, The New Media Communication, Research, and Technology . Beverly Hills: Sage1984.
27.
Schramm, W. "Channels and Audiences," I. de Sola Pool (ed.), Handbook of Communication. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
28.
Seger, K. "The Electronic Bulletin Board," PC Magazine, 1:9 (January 1983), 214-220.
29.
Smith, A.Goodbye Gutenberg The Newspaper Revolution of the 1980's. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.
30.
Vallee, J.The Network Revolution—Confessions of a Computer Scientist. Berkeley CA: And/Or Press, 1982 .
31.
Weaver, D.H. "Teletext and Viewdata: a Closer Look," E. Wartella and S. Windahl (eds.). Mass Communication Review Yearbook, 1983.
32.
Weizenbaum, J.Computer Power and Human Reason—From Judgment to Calculation . San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.
33.
Wright, C.R.Mass Communication: A Sociological Perspective. New York : Random House, 1959.
34.
Zimbardo, P.G. "The Age of Indifference," Psychology Today, 14:3 (August 1980), 70-76.
