Marital Satisfaction, Adaptability and Cohesion were analyzed as predictors of Job Satisfaction for dual-career women (n = 197) at Early, Middle, and Late life cycle stages. Assessments used were the Career Attitudes and Strategies Inventory (CASI), Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale II (FACES II). Cohesion in the Early life cycle and Adaptability in the Late life cycle were found to be significant predictors (p = < .05) of Job Satisfaction. Increased satisfaction was also shown as the three life cycle stages progressed.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (1996). Introduction to research in education. (5th ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
2.
Baber, K.M., & Allen, K.R. (1992). Women and families: Feminist reconstructions. New York: Gilford Press.
3.
Becker, P.E., & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 995-1007.
4.
Berkley, K.C. (1999). The women's liberation movement in America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
5.
Carter, B., & McGoldrick, M. (Eds.) (1988). Family life cycle: A framework for family therapy. (2nd ed.). New York: Gardner Press.
6.
Gottman, J.M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriages work . New York: Metropolitan Books.
7.
Heitler, S. (1997). The power of two. Oakland, CA: Harbinger.
8.
Holland, J.L., & Gottfredson, G.D. (1993). Career Attitudes and Strategies Inventory. Baltimore, MD: Holland and Gottfredson.
9.
Judd, C.M., Smith, E.R., & Kidder, L.H. (1991). Research methods in social Relations (6th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Rinehart & Winston.
10.
Konek, C.W., Kitch, S.L., & Shone, E.R. (1994). The future of women and careers: Issues and challenges . In C.W. Konek & S. L. Kitch (Eds.), Women and Careers (pp. 234-248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11.
Locke, H.J., & Wallace, K.M. (1959). Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage and Family Living , 21, 251-255.
12.
Morgan, B., & Foster, V. (1999). Career counseling for re-entry dual career women: A cognitive developmental approach. Journal of Career Development , 26, 125-136.
13.
Olson, D.H., Bell, R., & Portner, J. (1982). FACES II: Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Family Social Science.
14.
Olson, D.H., Sprenkle, D.H., & Russell, C.S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems I: Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications . Family Process, 18, 3-28.
15.
Phillips-Miller, D.L., Campbell, N.J., & Morrison, C.R.Work and family: Satisfaction, stress, and spousal support. Journal of Employment Counseling, 37, 16-30.
16.
Roxburgh, S. (1999). Exploring the work and family relationship: Gender differences in the influence of parenthood and social support on job satisfaction . Journal of Family Issues, 20, 771-788.
17.
Schaefer, R.L., & Farber, E. (1992). The Student Edition of Minitab. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley & Benjamin/Cummings .
18.
Sinacore-Guinn, A.L., Akcali, F.O., & Fledderus, S.W. (1999). Employed women: Family and work—Reciprocity and satisfaction. Journal of Career Development, 25, 187-201.
19.
Snyder, N.M. (1994). Career women in perspective: the Wichita sample . In C.W. Konek & S. L. Kitch (Eds.), Women and Careers (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
20.
Spain, D., & Bianchi, S. (1996). Balancing Act. NewYork: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
Spanier, G.B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
22.
Spanier, G.B. (1976). The Dyadic Adjustment Scale. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
23.
Stanfield, J.B. (1998). Couples coping with dual careers: A description of flexible and rigid coping styles. The Social Science Journal , 35, 53-64.
24.
Stolz-Loike, M. (1992). Dual career couples: New perspectives in counseling . Alexandria, VA: Association for Counseling.
25.
Warren, J.A., & Johnson, P.J. (1994). The impact of workplace support on work-family role strain. Family Relations, 44, 163-169.
