For American public schools, the interplay between religion and public policy has been rather volatile, thanks to both state and federal constitutions mandating an ever shifting degree of separation between church and state, yet permitting free religious expression. Some of the most intense political disputes in the past 40 years have involved educational issues such as the teaching of evolution or intelligent design within public schools, publicly funded vouchers for attendance at religious institutions, state-sanctioned prayer within public schools, and the rise of sexuality education. This article seeks to map some of the contemporary features involved with religion and the politics of U.S. education by focusing on (a) recent court decisions, (b) the policy agendas of the current Bush administration, and (c) curricular issues. The article closes by focusing on a few of the larger issues relating to religion and education in a highly pluralistic and religiously fluid society.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963).
2.
Ahlstrom, S. E. (1972). A religious history of the American people. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
3.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State. (2003). An analysis of the “Guidance on constitutionally protected prayer in public elementary and secondary schools.” Retrieved May 15, 2003, from http://www.au.org/legal/publicschoolguidance.htm
4.
Apple, M. W. (2001). Educating the “right” way: Markets, standards, god, and inequality. New York: Routledge-Falmer.
5.
Armstrong, K. (2000). The battle for God. New York: Knopf.
6.
Arndorfer, E. (2000). Absent abstinence accountability. Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly, 27, 585-595.
7.
Baptist Press. (2003, April 11). Transcript of interview with the secretary of education (March 7, 2003 interview with Secretary of Education Rod Paige). Retrieved May 4, 2003, from http://www.baptistpress.com/bpnews.asp?ID=15707
8.
Barbour, V. (2002). Science and myth. The Lancet, 359(9315), 1364.
9.
Blasi, V. (2002). Vouchers and steering. Journal of Law & Politics, 18, 607-633.
10.
Boyd, W. L., Lugg, C. A., & Zahorchak, G. L. (1996). Social traditionalists, religious conservatives and the politics of outcome-based education: Pennsylvania and beyond. Education and Urban Society, 28(3), 347-365.
11.
Bruce, S. (2000). Zealot politics and democracy: The case of the new Christian right. Political Studies, 48(2), 263-282.
12.
Crisafulli, S. J. (2003). Zelman v. Simmons-Harris: Is the Supreme Court’s latest word on school voucher programs really the last word? Fordham Law Review, 71, 2227-2281.
13.
Diamond, S. (1995). Roads to dominion: Right-wing movements and political power in the United States. New York: Guilford.
14.
Diamond, S. (1998). Not by politics alone: The enduring influence of the Christian right. New York: Guilford.
15.
Edwards, J. (1998). Opposing censorship in the public schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987).
17.
Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97 (1968).
18.
Epstein, S. B. (1996). Rethinking the constitutionality of ceremonial deism. Columbia Law Review, 96, 2083-2174.
19.
Eskridge, W. N., Jr. (2000). No promo homo: The sedimentation of antigay discourse and the channeling effect of judicial review. New York University Law Review, 75, 1327-1411.
20.
Fraser, J. W. (1999). Between church and state: Religion and public education in a multicultural America. New York: St. Martin’s.
21.
French, R. (2003). Shopping for religion: The change in everyday religious practice and its importance to the law. Buffalo Law Review, 51, 127-199.
22.
Fried, C. (2002). Five to four: Reflections on the school voucher case. Harvard Law Review, 116, 163-198.
23.
Gaddy, B. B., Hall, T. W., & Marzano, R. J. (1996). School wars: Resolving our conflicts over religion and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
George, M. (2001). And then God created Kansas? The evolution/creationism debate in America’s public schools. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 149, 843-872.
25.
Gey, S. G. (2000). When is religious speech not “free speech”? University of Illinois Law Review, 379-460.
26.
Gey, S. G. (2001). The no religion zone: Constitutional limitations on religious association in the public sphere. Minnesota Law Review, 85, 1885-1916.
27.
Gilman, M. E. (2002). “Charitable choice” and the accountability challenge: Reconciling the need for regulation with the First Amendment religion clauses. Vanderbilt Law Review, 55, 799-888.
28.
Goodstein, L. (2001, February 20). Bush’s call to church groups to get untraditional replies. The New York Times, p. A1.
29.
Green, S. K. (2002). The illusionary aspect of “private choice” for constitutional analysis. Willamette Law Review, 38, 549-577.
30.
Greenawalt, K. (2003). Establishing religious ideas: Evolution, creationism and intelligent design. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 17, 321-397.
31.
Gresock, J. (2001). No freedom from religion: The marginalization of atheists in American society, politics, and law. Margins, 1, 569-610.
Jones, J. (2002). Money, sex and the religious right: A constitutional analysis of federal funded abstinence-only-until-marriage sexuality education. Creighton Law Review, 35, 1075-1105.
34.
Kaminer, D. (2002). Bringing organized prayer in through the back door: How moment-ofsilence legislation for the public schools violates the establishment clause. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 13, 267-322.
35.
Karst, K. L. (2003). Law, cultural conflict, and the socialization of children. California Law Review, 91, 967-1027.
36.
Kirby, D. (2002). The impact of schools and school programs upon adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 39(1), 27-33.
37.
Kirkpatrick, L. D. (2000). Forgetting the lessons of history: The evolution of creationism and current trends to restrict the teaching of evolution in public schools. Drake Law Review, 49, 125-145.
38.
Kitcher, P. (1982). Abusing science: The case against creationism. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.
39.
Kramnick, I., & Moore, L. (1997). The godless Constitution: The case against religious correctness. New York: Norton.
40.
Lawrence v. Texas (2003). [The complete citation will not be available until spring 2004. Please see http://www.supremecourtus.gov]
41.
Layton, D. H. (1996). Religion and the politics of education. Education and Urban Society, 28(3), 275-278.
42.
Lehman, D. M. (2001). The godless graduation ceremony? The state of student-initiated graduation prayer after Lee v. Weisman and Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe. Colorado Law Review, 72, 175-199.
43.
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971).
44.
Lugg, C. A. (1996). For God and country: Conservatism and American school policy. New York: Peter Lang.
45.
Lugg, C. A. (1998). The religious right and public education: The paranoid politics of homophobia. Educational Policy, 12(3), 267-283.
46.
Lugg, C. A. (1999). Kitsch: From education to public policy. New York: Falmer.
47.
Lugg, C. A. (2000). Reading, writing and reconstructionism: The Christian Right and the politics of public education. Educational Policy, 14(5), 622-637.
48.
Lugg, C. A. (2001). The Christian Right: A cultivated collection of interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1), 41-57.
49.
Lugg, C. A. (2003). Sissies, faggots, lezzies and dykes: Gender, sexual orientation and the new politics of education. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 95-134.
50.
Marshall, W. P. (2002a). Remembering the values of separatism and state funding of religious organizations (charitable choice): To aid is not necessarily to protect. Journal of Law& Politics, 18, 479-498.
51.
Marshall, W. P. (2002b). The limits of secularism: Public religious expression in moments of national crisis and tragedy. Notre Dame Law Review, 78, 11-33.
52.
Marty, M. E. (2000). Education, religion and the common good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
McCarthy, M. (2000). Religion and education: Whither the establishment clause? Indiana Law Journal, 75, 123-166.
54.
McCarthy, M. (2001). Preserving the establishment clause: One step forward and two steps back.Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 271-298.
55.
McLaughlin, S. T. (2002). More than meets the eye: President Bush’s faith-based initiative. University of Memphis Law Review, 33, 41-81.
56.
McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F. Supp. 1255, 1267 (E.D. Ark. 1982).
57.
Minow, M. (2003). Values in an era of privatization: Public and private partnerships— Accounting for the new religion. Harvard Law Review, 116, 1229-1270.
58.
Moore, R. (2002). America’s anti-evolution movement. Academic Questions, 15(2), 69-78.
59.
Moore, R. L. (1994). Selling God: American religion in the market place of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
60.
Newdow v. U.S. Congress, 292 F.3d 597, 607-608 (9th Cir. 2002).
61.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. 6301 et seq.
62.
Pennock, R. T. (1999). Tower of Babel: The evidence against the new creationism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
Provenzo, E. F., Jr., & McCloskey, G. N. (2000). Religion and public education: An introduction to the special issue. Educational Policy, 14(5), 541-547.
64.
Roof, W. C. (1999). Spiritual marketplace: Baby boomers and the remaking of American religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
65.
Rosenberg, D. M. (2001). Monkey business and unnatural selection: Opening the schoolhouse door to religion by discrediting the tenets of Darwinism. Journal of Law and Policy, 9, 611-690.
66.
Ryan, J. E. (2000). The Supreme Court and public schools. Virginia Law Review, 86, 1335-1433.
67.
Ryan, J. E., & Heise, M. (2002). The political economy of school choice. Yale Law Journal, 111, 2043-2136.
68.
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe, 530 U.S. 290 (2000).
69.
Seiler, N. K. (2002). Abstinence-only education and privacy. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 24, 27-41.
70.
Sullivan, K. M. (2003). The new religion and the Constitution. Harvard Law Review, 116, 1397-1421.
71.
Tabbaa-Rida, Z. (2003). Muslim women reflecting on American education: Exploring the question of educational identity. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Van Geel, T. (2003). Vouchers, the Supreme Court, and the next political rounds. In W. L. Boyd& D. Miretzky (Eds.), American educational governance on trial: Change and challenges (pp. 136-154). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
74.
Veen, J. (2000). Where do we go from here? The need for consistent establishment clause jurisprudence. Rutgers Law Review, 52, 1195-1227.
75.
Vergari, S. (2000). Morality politics and educational policy: The abstinence-only sex education grant. Education Policy, 14(2), 290-310.
76.
Wexler, J. D. (1997). Of Pandas, people, and the First Amendment: The Constitutionality of teaching intelligent design in the public schools. Stanford Law Review, 49, 439-470.
77.
Wilcox, C. (1996). Onward Christian soldiers? The religious right in American politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
78.
Yannella, P. N. (2002). Stuck in the web of formalism: Why reversing the ninth circuit’s ruling on the Pledge of Allegiance won’t be so easy. Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review, 12, 79-94.
79.
Zehr, M. A. (2003, February 5). Culture clash. Education Week, 22(21), 26-30.
80.
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 122 S. Ct. 2460 (2002).
81.
Zimmerman, J. (2002). Whose America? Culture wars in the public schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
