Diminished Access to the Baccalaureate for Low-Income and Minority Students in California: The Impact of Budget and Capacity Constraints on the Transfer Function
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2005
Diminished Access to the Baccalaureate for Low-Income and Minority Students in California: The Impact of Budget and Capacity Constraints on the Transfer Function
California’s 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education promised all students a chance to pursue a baccalaureate degree by guaranteeing a place at one of the public 4-year institutions for all students who successfully fulfill a minimum set of requirements at a community college. However, capacity constraints in the state’s public colleges and universities are calling into question this promise of access to the baccalaureate. Dramatic cuts to higher education budgets combined with significant enrollment pressures and fee increases are reducing access for students who are lower income and underrepresented minority whose primary gate to the baccalaureate is through the community college transfer process. This article draws on data analysis and interviews with system and campus administrators to document the mechanisms by which access for these students is being restricted. The article discusses policy implications for California, and outlines lessons for other states experiencing similar social, demographic, and fiscal trends.
Bradburn, E. M., & Hurst, D. G. (2001). Community college transfer rates to 4-year institutions using alternative definitions of transfer. Education Statistics Quarterly, 3(3). Available at http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly
2.
California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. (2003a). Access lost: An examination of supply constriction and rationing in the California Community College system. Sacramento, CA: Author.
3.
California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. (2003b). California community colleges fall 2003 preliminary enrollment report. Sacramento, CA: Author.
4.
California Department of Finance. (2003). California public postsecondary enrollment projections. Sacramento, CA: Author.
5.
California Department of Finance. (2004a). County population projections with age, sex and race/ethnic detail. Sacramento, CA: Author.
6.
California Department of Finance. (2004b). Governor’s budget May revision, 2004-05Sacramento, CA: Author.
7.
California Department of Finance. (2004c). Governor’s budget summary, 2004-05. Sacramento, CA: Author.
California Postsecondary Education Commission. (2002b). Student transfer in California post-secondary education. Sacramento, CA: Author.
10.
California State Department of Education. (1960). A master plan for higher education in California: 1960-1975. Sacramento, CA: Author.
11.
California State University. (2003a, July 30). Additional cuts in state budget force CSU to reduce enrollment [CSU press release]. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from www.calstate.edu/pa/news/2003/Budget0304.shtml
12.
California State University. (2003b). Statistical abstract 2002-03. Long Beach, CA: Author.
13.
California State University. (2004, May 7). CSU offers deferred admission to students redirected to community colleges [CSU press release]. Retrieved June 29, 2004, from www.calstate.edu/pa/news/2004/deferred.shtml
14.
California State University Office of the Chancellor. (2002). The California State University enrollment management policies and practices. Long Beach, CA: Author.
15.
Cohen, A. M. (2003). The community colleges and the path to the baccalaureate (Research and Occasional Paper Series CSHE.4.03). Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.
16.
Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (1996). Policies and programs that affect transfer. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED385336)
17.
Cuseo, J. B. (1998). The transfer transition: A summary of key issues, target areas and tactics for reform. Unpublished manuscript. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED425771)
18.
Dougherty, K. J. (1992). Community colleges and baccalaureate attainment. Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 188-214.
19.
Grubb, W. N. (1991). The decline of community college transfer rates: Evidence from national longitudinal surveys. Journal of Higher Education, 62(2), 194-222.
20.
Harrison, S. (2003). Envisioning a state of learning: Conference summary and observations on the California Master Plan for Higher Education. Sacramento: California State University Center for California Studies.
21.
Hungar, J. Y., & Lieberman, J. (2001). The road to equality: Report on transfer for the Ford Foundation. New York: Ford Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED455856)
22.
Hurst, D. G., & Bradburn, E. M. (2001, December 7). State- and institution-level effects on community college students’ transfer to 4-year institutions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
23.
Joint Committee to Develop a Master Plan for Education. (2002). The California master plan for education. Sacramento, CA: Author.
24.
Maxwell, L. A. (2004, June 6). Eager to enter, they still shun UC. Sacramento Bee. Retrieved June 6, 2004, from www.sacbee.com
25.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Digest of education statistics, 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
26.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2000). Measuring up 2000: The state-by-state report card for higher education. San Jose, CA: Author.
27.
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2002). Measuring up 2002: The state-by-state report card for higher education. San Jose, CA: Author.
28.
Schwartz, W. (2001). Strategies for improving the educational outcomes of Latinas (ERIC Digest). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED458344). Available at www.ericdigests.org/
29.
Shaw, K. M., & London, H. B. (2001). Culture and ideology in keeping transfer commitment: Three community colleges. Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 91-114.
30.
Striplin, J. (1999). Facilitating transfer for first-generation community college students. ERIC Digest. Los Angeles, CA: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430627)
31.
University of California Office of the President. (2003). Information digest 2003. Oakland, CA: Author.
32.
University of California Office of the President. (2004, February). More transfer, fewer freshman applicants for fall 2004. UC Notes. Oakland, CA: Author. Available at www.ucop.edu/pathways/ucnotes/welcome_february04.html
33.
Wellman, J. V. (2003, November 21) Finances and accountability: What are the options? Presentation to the Community College League of California, Sacramento.
