This study uses teacher-level data from the Schools and Staffing Survey of 1999 to test whether teachers in charter schools have stronger academic backgrounds than their peers working in conventional public schools and whether state regulatory policies are associated with differences between public and public charter school teachers. Specifically, the authors estimate whether school type (public, public charter, independent private, private Catholic) is associated with the likelihood that a teacher attended a highly or most competitive undergraduate college. They find compelling evidence both that charter schools generally hire more teachers from more competitive undergraduate institutions than do conventional public schools and, furthermore, that relaxation of state teacher certification policies for charter schools increases the likelihood that charter schools hire teachers from more competitive undergraduate institutions. Findings are highly dependent on supply of teachers from competitive undergraduate institutions.
Angrist, J., & Guryan, J. (2003) Does teacher testing raise teacher quality? Evidence from state certification requirements (NBER Working Paper No. 9545). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
2.
Baker, B. D., & Cooper, B. S. (2005). Do principals with stronger academic backgrounds hire smarter teachers? Implications for high poverty schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(3), 449-479.
3.
Ballou, D. (1996). Do public schools hire the best teachers?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(1), 97-133.
4.
Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1998). Teacher recruitment and retention in public and private schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(3), 393-417.
5.
Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (2000). Gaining control of professional licensing and advancement. In T. Loveless (Ed.), Conflicting missions? Teachers unions and educational reform (pp. 69-109). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
6.
Barron’s Educational Series (Ed.). (2000) Barron’s Profiles of American Colleges (24th ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Author.
7.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M. K. (2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3-15.
8.
Coleman, J., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfield, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
9.
Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B., & Thoreson, A. (2001). Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 57-78.
10.
Decker, P. T., Mayer, D. P., & Glazerman, S. (2004). The effects of Teach for America on students. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved July 8, 2004, from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/pdfs/teach.pdf
11.
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Brewer, D. J. (1994). Do school and teacher characteristics matter? Evidence from high school and beyond. Economics of Education Review, 13(1), 1-17.
12.
Ehrenberg, R. G., & Brewer, D. J. (1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960s? Coleman revisited. Economics of Education Review, 14, 1-21.
13.
Emley, K., & Ebmeier, H. (1997). The effect of employment interview format on principals’ evaluations of teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 39-56.
14.
Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28, 465-498.
15.
Figlio, D. N. (1997). Teacher salaries and teacher quality. Economics Letters, 55, 267-271.
16.
Figlio, D. N. (2002). Can public schools buy better-qualified teachers?Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55, 686-699.
17.
Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129-145.
18.
Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. J. (2001). Evaluating the evidence on teacher certification: A rejoinder. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 79-86.
19.
Gordon, G. (1999). Teacher talent and urban schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(4), 304-307.
20.
Green, P. C., & Mead, J. (2004). Charter schools and the law: Establishing new legal relationships. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
21.
Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F., & Rivken, S. G. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers? (NBER Working Paper No. 7082) Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
Harris, D. (2003). Lowering the bar or moving the target: A wage decomposition of Michigan’s charter and traditional public school teachers. Working paper, Michigan State University Education Policy Center. Available from http://www.epc.msu.edu/publications/workpapers/wagedecomp.pdf
23.
Henke, R., Chen, X., & Geis, S. (1999). Progress through the teacher education pipeline: 1992-93 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Available from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000152.pdf
24.
Kuscova, S., & Buckley, J. (2004). The effect of charter school legislation on market share. Working paper, Boston College. Available from http://www2.bc.edu/%7Ebucklesj/kb2004.pdf
25.
Laczko-Kerr, I., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). The effectiveness of “Teach for America” and other undercertified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37). Retrieved March 6, 2004, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37/
26.
Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Wyckoff, J. (2002). Teacher sorting and the plight of urban schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 37-62.
27.
Loeb, S., & Page, M. (1998). Examining the link between wages and quality in the teacher workforce. Working paper, University of California, Davis.
28.
Loeb, S., & Page, M. (2000). Examining the link between teacher wages and student outcomes: The importance of alternative labor market opportunities and nonpecuniary variation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82, 393-408.
29.
Murnane, R. J., & Olsen, R. (1989). The effects of salaries and opportunity costs on length of state in teaching: Evidence from Michigan. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 347-352.
30.
Reback, R. (2004). The impact of college course offerings on the supply of academically talented public school teachers. Journal of Econometrics, 121(1-2), 377-404.
31.
Rivken, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. F. (2000). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement (NBER Working Paper No. 6691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Research project report: Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center. Available from http://www.mdkl2.org/practices/ensure/tva/tva_2.html
33.
Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2003). Making the grade: Comparing D.C. charter schools to other D.C. public schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 203-215.
34.
Slosson, J. (1999). Hiring the right people. High School Magazine, 7(2), 26-30.
35.
StataCorp. (n.d.). Stata (Version 7.0) [Computer software]. College Station, TX: Author.
36.
Strauss, R. P., Bowes, L. R., Marks, M. S., & Plesko, M. R. (2000). Improving teacher preparation and selection: Lessons from the Pennsylvania experience. Economics of Education Review, 19(4), 387-415.
37.
Trimble, S. (2001). The teacher applicant pool: What top administrators seek. Principal Leadership, 1(7), 44-47.
