Although the No Child Left Behind Act was intended to help “all students meet high academic standards,” it is focused on subgroups of low-achieving students. The authors analyze the possible impact of the legislation's requirement for performance reporting by racial subgroup in light of the considerable racial segregation in U.S. schools. In particular, using data on elementary and middle schools in New York State, the authors show that the schools are so highly segregated that more than half are too homogeneous to report test scores for any racial or ethnic subgroups. In addition, they show that the racial achievement gap is greatest across segregated schools rather than within integrated ones. The authors analyze the characteristics of schools that are and are not accountable for subgroups, finding that urban schools and large schools are particularly likely to be accountable, and conclude with implications for the reach of the law and for incentives for school segregation.
Carnoy, M., & Loeb, S. (2003). Does external accountability affect student outcomes? A cross-state analysis. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 25(1), 305-331.
2.
Carrington, W.J., & Troske, K.R. (1997). On measuring segregation in samples with small units. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 15(4), 402-409.
3.
Clotfelter, C. (2001). Are Whites still fleeing? Racial patterns and enrollment shifts in urban public schools, 1987-1996. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(2), 199-221.
4.
Cook, M.D., & Evans, W.N. (2000). Families or schools? Explaining the convergence in White and Black academic performance. Journal of Labor Economics, 18(4), 729-754.
5.
Cortese, C.F., Falk, R.F., & Cohen, J.K. (1976). Further considerations on the methodological analysis of segregation indices. American Sociological Review, 41(4), 630-637.
6.
Freedman, S. (2005, September 28). The achievement gap in elite schools . The New York Times, p. B7.
7.
Fryer, R.G., & Levitt, S.D. (2004). Understanding the Black-White test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics , 86(2), 447-464.
8.
Fuller, E., & Johnson, J. (2001). Can state accountability systems drive improvements in school performance for children of color and children from low-income homes ? Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 260-283.
9.
Hanushek, E. (2002). Publicly-provided education (Working Paper 8799) . Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved February 25, 2003, from http://dsl.nber.org/papers/w8799.pdf
10.
Hanushek, E., & Raymond, M. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 297-327.
11.
Hedges, L., & Nowell, A. (1998). Black-White test score convergence since 1965 . In C. Jencks & M. Philips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 149-181). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
12.
Jacob, B. (2002). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago public schools (Working Paper 8968). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved May 11, 2004, from http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8968
13.
Jencks, C., & Philips, M. (1998). The Black-White test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
14.
Kane, T., & Staiger, D. (2001). Improving school accountability measures (Working Paper 8156). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved December 17, 2003 , from http://papers.nber.org/papers/w8156.pdf
15.
Kane, T., & Staiger, D. (2003). Unintended consequences of racial subgroup rules . In P. E. Peterson & M. R. West (Eds.), No child left behind? The politics and practice of accountability (pp. 152-176). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
16.
Kim, D.Y. (2004, March). The unintended consequences of New York State's high-stakes testing: Evidence from New York City public schools. Paper presented at the 29th annual meeting of the American Education Finance Association, Salt Lake City, UT.
17.
Ladd, H. (1999). The Dallas school accountability and incentive program: An evaluation of its impacts on student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 18(1), 1-16.
18.
Linn, R. (2005). Fixing the NCLB accountability system (CRESST Policy Brief 8)Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing . Retreived October 4, 2005, from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/newsletters/policybrief8.pdf
19.
Loeb, S., & Strunk, K. (2003). The contribution of administrative and experimental data to education policy research. National Tax Journal, 56(2), 415-438.
20.
Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2003a). The nation's report card: Mathematics highlights 2003 . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved December 17, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2003/2004451.pdf
22.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2003b). The nation's report card: Reading highlights 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved December 17, 2003, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2003/2004452.pdf
23.
New York State Education Department. (2002 ). New York State school report card. Albany : Author. Retrieved July 8, 2002 , from http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/repcrd2002/database.html
24.
New York State Education Department. (2004 ). Accountability peer review, New York State . Retrieved March 8, 2004, from http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/deputy/nclb/accountability/nclbaccountabilityplan.doc
25.
Olson, L. (2003, August 6). “Approved” is relative term for Ed. Dept. Education Week, p. 1.
26.
Olson, L. (2005, September 21). AYP rules miss many in spec. ed.; more students left out of accountability ratings. Education Week, pp. 1, 24.
27.
Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2004). Brown at 50: King's dream or Plessy's nightmare ? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Harvard Civil Rights Project. Retrieved March 3, 2004, from http://www.civilrightsproject.harvard.edu/research/reseg04/brown50.pdf
28.
Paige, R. (2003, October 27). Real education reform [Letter to the editor]. The New York Times, p. A20.
29.
Persky, J., & Kurban, H. (2003). Do federal spending and tax policies build cities or promote sprawl? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33, 361-378.
30.
Peterson, P., & West, M. R. (Eds.). (2003). No child left behind? The politics and practice of accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
31.
Reardon, S.F. (2003). Sources of educational inequality: The growth of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic test score gaps in kindergarten and first grade (Working Paper 03-05R). State College: Pennsylvania State University, Population Research Institute. Retrieved January 3, 2005, from http://www.pop.psu.edu/general/pubs/working_papers/psu-pri/wp0305R.pdf
32.
Smith, S., & Mickelson, R. (2000). All that glitters is not gold: School reform in Charlotte-Mecklenburg. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 22(2), 101-127.
33.
Stiefel, L., Schwartz, A.E., & Chellman, C.C. (2003). Education Finance Research Consortium condition report: Beyond Black and White: Patterns and relationships in New York State test score gaps. Albany: Rockefeller College, State University of New York at Albany, Center for Policy Research.
34.
Stiefel, L., Schwartz, A.E., & Ellen, I.G. (2004, March). Disentangling the race gap in students achievement. Paper presented at the 29th annual meeting of the American Education Finance Association, Salt Lake City, UT.
35.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004a). Accountability peer review, New York State. Retrieved March 8, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/stateplans03/nycsa.doc
36.
U.S. Department of Education (2004b, January 14). Charting the course: States decide major provisions under No Child Left Behind. Retrieved September 28, 2005, from http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2004/01/01142004.html
37.
Voith, R., & Gyourko, J. (2002). Capitalization of federal taxes, the relative price of housing, and urban form: Density and sorting effects. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 32, 673-690.
38.
Zoloth, B.S. (1976). Alternative measures of school segregation. Land Economics, 52(3), 278-291.
