This article discusses the limited use of education vouchers in an era of unprecedented growth in school choice. It is divided into two parts: first, a description of the policy, political, and legal barriers that may limit the expansion of large-scale voucher programs is presented. Discussion then shifts to the efforts of voucher advocates to build support among historically marginalized populations frustrated with the performance of public schools and open to limited forms of private school choice. The authors consider the consequences of these strategies and suggest that the very voucher programs that appeal to disadvantaged families may prove most offensive to middleclass and suburban voters who vigorously object to policies that undermine local authority and redistribute local resources. Specifically, vouchers have the potential to erase municipal boundaries, dissolve neighborhood ties, lower housing prices, and upset student enrollments.
Ackerman, D. (2003). Education vouchers: Constitutional issues and cases. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
2.
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., & Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 1243-1284.
3.
Alliance for School Choice. (2006). School choice programs around the country, Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.allianceforschoolchoice.org/school_choice_states.aspx
4.
Apple, M., & Pedroni, T. C. (2005). Conservative alliance building and African American support of vouchers: The end of Brown’s promise or a new beginning?Teachers College Record, 107, 2068-2105.
5.
Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Bayer, P., Ferreira, F., & McMillan, R. (2003). A united framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods (Discussion Paper No. 872). New Haven, CT: Yale University Economic Growth Center.
7.
Belfield, C. R. (2006). The evidence on education vouchers: An application to the Cleveland scholarship and tutoring program. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College-Columbia University. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files
8.
Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2002). Does the Supreme Court ruling on vouchers in Cleveland really matter for education reform?New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College-Columbia University. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files
9.
Belfield, C. R., & Levin, H. M. (2005). Vouchers and public policy: When ideology trumps evidence. American Journal of Education, 111(4): 548-567.
10.
Black, S. (1999). Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 577-599.
11.
Bogart, W. T., & Cromwell, B. A. (2000). How much is a neighborhood school worth?Journal of Urban Economics, 47, 280-305.
12.
Bolick, C. (2004, April) School choice: Legal obstacles to expanded educational opportunities. Paper presented at the 50 Years After Brown: What has Been Accomplished and What Remains to Be Done? conference, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
13.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
14.
Bradbury, K. L., Mayer, C. J., & Case, K. E. (2001). Property tax limits, local fiscal behavior, and property values: Evidence from Massachusetts under Proposition 21/2. Journal of Public Economics, 80, 287-311.
15.
Brasington, D. (2006). School choice and the flight to private schools: To what extent are public and private schools substitutes? (Working Paper #2006-04). Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, Department of Economics.
16.
Brownstein, R. (2003). Locked down. Education Next, 3(3), 40-46.
17.
Brunner, E., & Sonstelie, J. (2002). Homeowners, property values, and the political economy of the school voucher. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College-Columbia University. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files
18.
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S., & Easton, J. Q. (1998). Charting Chicago school reform: Democratic localism as a lever for change. Boulder, CO: Westview.
19.
Bush v. Holmes, No. 04-2323 (Fla. Jan. 5, 2006).
20.
Camilli, G., and Bulkley, K. (2001). Critique of “An Evaluation of the Florida A-Plus Accountability Program.”Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(7).
21.
Carnoy, M. (2001). School vouchers: Examining the evidence. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved December 8, 2006, from http://www.epinet.org/studies/vouchersfull.pdf
22.
Casey, L., & Rivkin, D., Jr. (2003, September 27). Don’t tred on D.C. The New York Times, p. A15-A15.
23.
Catterall, J., & Chapleau, R. (2003). Voting on vouchers: A socio-political analysis of California proposition 38. Journal of Education Finance, 29(1), 25-47.
24.
Center for Education Reform. (2006). National charter school data at-a-glance. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.edreform.com
25.
Chiodo, A., Hernandez-Murillo, R., & Owyang, M. (2005). Nonlinear hedonics and the search for school district quality (Working Paper 2003-039D). St. Louis, MO: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
26.
Chittenden Town School District v. Vermont Department of Education (97-275), 169 Vt. 310, 738 A.2d 539 (1999).
27.
Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
28.
Clotfelter, C. (1979). Urban school desegregation and declines in White enrollment: A reexamination. Journal of Urban Economics, 6, 352-370.
29.
Clotfelter, C. (2001). Are Whites still fleeing? Racial patterns and enrollment shifts in urban public schools, 1987-1996. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 199-221.
30.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology. 94(Supp.), S95-S120.
31.
Coleman, J., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: The impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.
32.
Coleman, J., Kelly, S., & Moore, J. (1975). Trends in school segregation, 1968-1973. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
33.
Coons, J. (2005). Dodging democracy: The educators flight from the specter of choice. The American Journal of Education, 111(4), 596-608.
34.
Dillon, S. (2006, January 6). Florida Supreme Court blocks school vouchers. The New York Times, p. A16-A16.
35.
Downes, T. A., & Zabel, J. E. (2002). The impact of school characteristics on housing prices: Chicago 1987-1991. Journal of Urban Economics, 52, 1-25.
36.
Farley, R., Richards, T., & Wurdock, C. (1980). School desegregation and White flight: An investigation of competing models and their discrepant findings. Sociology of Education, 53, 123-139.
37.
Ferreyra, M. M. (2006). Estimating the effects of private school vouchers in multi-district economies. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College-Columbia University. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files
38.
Figlio, D., & Lucas, M. (2000). What’s in a grade? School report cards and house prices (Working Paper 8019). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
39.
Figlio, D., & Rouse, C. (2001). Do accountability and voucher threats improve low-performing schools?Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved December 8, 2006, from http://www.nber.org/papers/W11597
40.
Fischel, W. A. (2002). An economic case against vouchers: Why local schools are a local public good. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College-Columbia University. Retrieved December 8, 2006, from http://ncspe.org/publications_files/101_op54.pdf
41.
Flygare, T. (1986). Establishment clause case reveals flaws in the court system. Phi Delta Kappan, 67, 613-614.
42.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43.
Fuller, B. (Ed.). (2000). Inside charter schools: The paradox of radical decentralization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Fuller, B., Huerta, L. A., & Ruenzel, D. (2000). A costly gamble or serious reform? California’s school voucher initiative—Proposition 38. Berkeley: Policy Analysis for California Education, University of California.
45.
Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
46.
Gehring, J. (2002, July 10). Voucher battles head to state capitals. Education Week. Retrieved June 21, 2006 from http://www.edweek.org
47.
Gill, B. P., Timpane, P. M., Ross, K. E., & Brewer, D. J. (2001). What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
48.
Godwin, R. K., & Kemerer, F. R. (2002). School choice tradeoffs: Liberty, equity, and diversity. Austin: University of Texas Press.
49.
Greene, J. (2000). The effect of school choice: An evaluation of the Charlotte children’s scholarship fund. New York: Center for Civic Innovation at the Manhattan Institute.
50.
Greene, J., Peterson, P., & Du, J. (1999). Effectiveness of school choice: The Milwaukee experiment. Education and Urban Society, 31, 190-213.
51.
Greene, J., & Winters, M. (2003). When schools compete: The effects of vouchers on Florida public school achievement. New York: Manhattan Institute. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_02.htm
52.
Hacsi, T. (2004). Innovation and accountability: Vouchers, charters, and the Florida Virtual Schools. Tempe, AZ: Education Policy Studies Laboratory. Retrieved December 8, 2006, from http://epsl.asu.edu/epru/documents/EPSL-0401-109-EPRU.doc
53.
Haynes, K. J., & Taylor, L. L. (1996). Neighborhood school characteristics: What signals quality to homebuyers?Economic Review, 4th quarter, 2-9.
54.
Henig, J. E., & Sugarman, S. D. (1999). The nature and extent of school choice. In S. D. Sugarman & F .R. Kemerer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy (pp. 13-35). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
55.
Hill, P. (2003). Administrative costs of a voucher program. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved December 8, 2006, from http://www.crpe.org/pubs/introAdminCostsVouchers.shtml
56.
Holmes v. Bush, No. 04-2323 (Fla. Jan. 5, 2006).
57.
Howell, W. G., Wolf, P. J., Campbell, D. E., & Peterson, P. E. (2002). School vouchers and academic performance: Results from three randomized field trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 191-217.
58.
Hoxby, C. (1998). What do America’s “traditional” forms of school choice teach us about school choice reform?Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 4(1), 47-59.
59.
Hoxby, C. (2000). Does competition among public schools benefit students and taxpayers?American Economic Review, 90, 1209-1238.
60.
Huerta, L. A., González, M. F., & d’Entremont, C. (2006). Cyber and home school charter schools: Adopting policy to new forms of public schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 103-139.
61.
Jain, P. (2002). The approval barrier to suburban charter schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrived January 2, 2007, from http://www.fordhamfoundation.org/institute/publication/publication.cfm?id=17
62.
Kemerer, F. (2002). The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Cleveland: Where to from here?New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teacher’s College-Columbia University. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files
63.
Kirp, D. (1995). Our town. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
64.
Kotterman v. Killian, 193 Ariz. 273, 972 P.2d 606 (Ariz. 1999), cert. den., 528 U.S. 810 (1999).
65.
Kreuger, A., & Pei, Z. (2004). Another look at the New York school voucher experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 658-698.
66.
Kupermintz, H. (2001). The effects of vouchers on school improvement: Another look at the Florida data. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(8).
67.
Labaree, D. (1997). How to succeed in school without really trying: The credentials race in American education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
Ladd, H. F. (2002). School vouchers: A critical view. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 3-24.
69.
Ladd, H. F., & Fiske, E. B. (2001). The uneven playing field of school choice: Evidence for New Zealand. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 43-63.
70.
Laitsch, D. (2002). K-12 voucher programs and education policy: An exploratory study of policy maker attitudes and opinions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(48).
71.
Levin, H. M. (2002). A comprehensive framework for evaluating educational vouchers. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 159-174.
72.
Levin, H. M., & Driver, C. (1997). Costs of an educational voucher system. Educational Economics, 5, 265-283.
73.
McDermott, K. A. (1999). Controlling public education: Localism versus equity. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
74.
McDonald, T. (2002). The false promise of vouchers. Education Leadership, 59(7), 33-37.
75.
McEwan, P. (2000). The potential impact of large-scale vouchers. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 103-149.
76.
McEwan, P., & Carnoy, M. (2000). The effectiveness and efficiency of private schools in Chile’s voucher system. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 213-239.
77.
Medler, A., & Ziebarth, T. (2004). Early lessons from Colorado’s voucher experience. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
78.
Mitchell, N., & Sanko, J. (2004). Voucher program quashed. Rocky Mountain News, p. 6A-6A.
79.
Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 41 L.Ed.2d. 1069, 94 S.Ct. 3112 (1974).
80.
Moe, T. M. (2001). Schools, vouchers, and the American public. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
81.
Molnar, A., Garcia, D., Sullivan, C., McEvoy, B., & Joanou, J. (2005). Profiles of for-profit education management organizations 2004-05. Tempe: Arizona State University, Commercialization in Education Research Unit, Education Policy Studies Laboratory. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/CERU/Documents/EPSL-0504-101-CERU.pdf
82.
Myers, D., Peterson, P., Meyer, D., Chou, J., & Howell, W. G. (2000). School choice in New York City after two years: An evaluation of the school choice scholarship program. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
83.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The condition of education. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/
84.
Nechyba, T. (1999). School finance, induced migration, and strategic patterns: The impact of private school vouchers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 1, 5-50.
85.
Nechyba, T. (2003). School finance, spatial income segregation, and the nature of communities. Journal of Urban Economics, 61, 61-89.
86.
Oates, W. E. (1969). The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: An empirical study of tax capitalization and the Tiebout hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy, 77, 957-971.
87.
Owens v. Colorado Congress of Parents, Teachers, and Students, 92 P.3d 933 (Colo. 2004).
88.
Paige, R. (2002, June 28). A win for America’s children. Washington Post, p. A29-A29.
89.
People for the American Way. (2001). Five years and counting: A closer look at the Cleveland voucher program. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=1374
90.
People for the American Way. (2006). History of failed vouchers and tuition tax credits. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=10387
91.
Peterson, K. (5 May, 2005). School vouchers slow to spread. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.stateline.org
92.
Peterson, P. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
93.
Peterson, P., Greene, J., & Du, J. (1999). Effectiveness of school choice: The Milwaukee experiment. Education and Urban Society, 31, 190-213.
94.
Rhode, P. W., & Strumpf, K. S. (2003). Assessing the importance of Tiebout sorting: Local heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990. American Economic Review, 93, 1648-1677.
95.
Robelen, E. (2002, July 10). Ruling gives second wind to Capitol Hill voucher advocates. Education Week. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.edweek.org
96.
Robin, S. S., & Bosco, J. J. (1976). Coleman’s desegregation research and policy recommendations. School Review, 82, 352-263.
97.
Rofes, E., & Stulberg, L. (2004). The emancipatory promise of charter schools: Toward a progressive politics of school choice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
98.
Rose, L., & Gallup, A. (2005). 37th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public’s attitudes toward the public schools. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa International. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0509pol.htm
99.
Rouse, C. E. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 553-603.
100.
Ryan, J. E., & Heise, M. (2002). The political economy of school choice. Yale Law Journal, 111, 2045-2136.
101.
Salins, P. (1993). Cities, suburbs, and the urban crisis. Public Agenda, 113, 91-104.
102.
Schneider, M., & Buckley, J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the Internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 133-144.
103.
Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
104.
Simmons-Harris v. Zelman, 72 F.Supp.2d 834 (N.D. Ohio 1999), aff’d, 234 F.3d 945 (6Cir. 2000), reversed, 536 U.S. 639 (2002).
105.
Tiebout, C. (1956). A pure theory of local public expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416-424.
106.
Tocqueville, A. (2000). Democracy in America (J. P. Mayer, Ed., & G. Lawrence, Trans.). New York: Perennial Classics.
107.
Tyack, D. (1993). School governance in the United States: Historical puzzles and anomalies. In J. Hannaway & M. Carnoy (Eds.), Decentralization and school improvement (pp. 1-32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
108.
Walsh, M. (2002). Justices settle case, nettle policy debate. Education Week. Retrieved June 21, 2006, from http://www.edweek.org
109.
Weimer, D. L., & Wolkoff, M. J. (2001). School performance and housing values: Using non-contiguous district and incorporation boundaries to identify school effects. National Tax Journal, 54, 231-253.
110.
West, M., & Peterson, P. (2005). The efficacy of choice threats within school accountability systems: Results from legislatively induced experiments. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Royal Economic Society, Nottingham University, UK.
111.
Wisconsin, Assembly Bill 150, Act 27 (1995).
112.
Wisconsin, Senate Bill 618, Act 125 (2005).
113.
Witte, J. (2000). The market approach to education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
114.
Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind, 474 U.S. 481 (1986).
