Today’s school integration policies in the United States are often “race neutral.” Scholarship on these race-neutral school integration policies finds they do not change the racial and ethnic composition of schools or do so under very specific conditions. Yet, we know relatively little about the mechanisms explaining these outcomes. Building on 2 years of qualitative data collection in two public elementary schools in a New York City implementing a voluntary, race-neutral integration policy, I find school leaders experience a racialized decoupling of their commitment to racial equity from the policy’s race-neutral design, its choice-based design, and the implementation context. I show how school leaders navigated this decoupling and how it led to racialized outcomes. I contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms shaping the outcomes of race-neutral policies, a point of growing importance given recent Supreme Court decisions on higher education.
AustensenM.Gould-EllenI.HerrineL.KarfunkelB.JushG. K.MoriartyS.RosoffS.SandersT.SternE.SuherM.WillisM. A.YagerJ. (2016). State of New York City’s housing and neighborhoods in 2015. NYU Furman Center.
3.
AyscueJ. B.Siegel-HawleyG.KucseraJ.WoodwardB. (2018). School segregation and resegregation in Charlotte and Raleigh, 1989-2010. Educational Policy, 32(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815625287
4.
BerreyE. (2015). The enigma of diversity: The language of race and the limits of racial justice. University of Chicago Press.
5.
BromleyP.PowellW. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530.
6.
CandipanJ. (2020). Choosing schools in changing places: Examining school enrollment in gentrifying neighborhoods. Sociology of Education, 93(3), 215–237.
7.
CarlsonD.BellE.LenardM. A.CowenJ. M.McEachinA. (2020). Socioeconomic-based school assignment policy and racial segregation levels: Evidence from the wake county public school system. American Educational Research Journal, 57(1), 258–304.
8.
CherngH. Y. S.SanzoneJ.AhramR. (2017). Demographic change and educating immigrant youth in New York City. NYU Steinhardt.
9.
ClotfelterC. T. (2011). After ‘Brown’: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton University Press.
10.
CoburnC. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.
11.
CohenD. (2021). NYC school segregation: A report card from the UCLA civil rights project: Still last, action needed now. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
12.
DeSenaJ. N. (2006). ‘What’s a mother to do?’ Gentrification, school selection, and the consequences for community cohesion. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(2), 241–257.
13.
DeterdingN. M.WatersM. C. (2021). Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(2), 708–739.
14.
De VotoC.WronowskiM. L. (2019). The resegregation of public schools? Examining parents involved in practice. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27, 4.
15.
DiamondJ. B. (2007). Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing policy and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 80(4), 285–313.
16.
DiamondJ. B.LewisA. E. (2022). Opportunity hoarding and the maintenance of “White” educational space. American Behavioral Scientist, 66(11), 1470–1489.
17.
DiemS. (2012). The relationship between policy design, context, and implementation in integration plans. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20, 23–36.
18.
DiemS. (2015). Seeking diversity: The challenges of implementing a race-neutral student assignment plan in an urban school district. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(7), 842–867.
19.
DiemS.FrankenbergE.ClearyC. (2015). Factors that influence school board policy making: The political context of student diversity in urban-suburban districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(5), 712–752.
20.
DiemS.HolmeJ. J.EdwardsW.HaynesM.EpsteinE. (2019). Diversity for whom? Gentrification, demographic change, and the politics of school integration. Educational Policy, 33(1), 16–43.
21.
DominaT.PennerA.PennerE. (2017). Categorical inequality: Schools as sorting machines. Annual Review of Sociology, 43(1), 311–330.
22.
EllisonG.PathakP. A. (2016). The efficiency of race-neutral alternatives to race-based affirmative action: Evidence from Chicago’s exam schools. National Bureau of Economic Research.
23.
FlinspachS. L.BanksK. E. (2005). Moving beyond race: Socioeconomic diversity as a race-neutral approach to desegregation in the Wake County schools. In BogerJ. C.OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 261–280). University of North Carolina Press.
24.
FrankenbergE. (2018). Using socioeconomic-based strategies to further racial integration in K-12 schools. Intercultural Development Research Association.
25.
FreidusA. (2020). Modes of belonging: Debating school demographics in gentrifying New York. American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 808–839.
26.
González-HowardM.SuárezE. (2021). Retiring the term English language learners: Moving toward linguistic justice through asset-oriented framing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 749–752.
27.
HallettT. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.
HarwellM.LeBeauB. (2010). Student eligibility for a free lunch as an SES measure in education research. Educational Researcher, 39(2), 120–131.
30.
HonigM. I. (2006). New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (Vol. 63). State University of New York Press.
31.
HorsfordS. D. (2019). School integration in the new Jim Crow: Opportunity or oxymoron?Educational Policy, 33(1), 257–275.
32.
JenningsJ. L. (2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247.
33.
KahlenbergR. D. (2007). Rescuing Brown v. board of education: Profiles of twelve school districts pursuing socioeconomic school integration: A report. Century Foundation.
34.
KahlenbergR. D. (Ed.) (2012). The future of school integration: Socioeconomic diversity as an education reform strategy. Century Foundation.
KeelsM. (2013). The importance of scaffolding the transition unpacking the null effects of relocating poor children into nonpoor neighborhoods. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 991–1018.
37.
KucseraJ.OrfieldG. (2014). New York state’s extreme school segregation: Inequality, inaction, and a damaged future. The Civil Rights Project.
38.
LanderB.TorresR. (2015, December15). What would it take to integrate our schools?New York Times.
39.
LareauA. (2021). Listening to people: A practical guide to interviewing, participant observation, data analysis, and writing it all up. University of Chicago Press.
40.
LewisA. E. (2003). Race in the schoolyard: Negotiating the color line in classrooms and communities. Rutgers University Press.
41.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B. (2015). Despite the best intentions: How racial inequality thrives in good schools. Oxford University Press.
42.
LewisA. E.DiamondJ. B.FormanT. A. (2015). Conundrums of integration desegregation in the context of racialized hierarchy. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 22–36.
43.
LinnR. L.WelnerK. G. (2007). Race-conscious policies for assigning students to schools: Social science research and the Supreme Court cases. National Academy of Education.
44.
LoboA. P.SalvoJ. J. (2013). The newest New Yorkers: Characteristics of the city’s foreign-born population. City of New York, Department of City Planning, Office of Immigrant Affairs.
45.
MaderN.HemphillC.AbbasQ. (2018). The paradox of choice: How school choice divides New York City elementary schools. Center for New York City Affairs.
46.
MaderN.KramerA.ButelA. (2018). Promising outcomes, limited potential: Diversity in admissions in New York City public schools. Center for New York City Affairs, The New School.
47.
McClellanC. (2023). When claims collide: Students for fair admissions v. Harvard and the meaning of discrimination. University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Law Research Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4465275
48.
McDermottK. A.FrankenbergE.DiemS. (2014). The ‘post-racial’ politics of race: Changing student assignment policy in three school districts. Educational Policy, 29(3), 504–554.
49.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
50.
MordechayK.AyscueJ. B.OrfieldF. G. (2019). School integration in gentrifying neighborhoods: Evidence from New York City. The Civil Rights Project.
51.
OrfieldG.FrankenbergE. (2013). Educational delusions? Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair. University of California Press.
52.
OwensJ. (2022). Double jeopardy: Teacher biases, racialized organizations, and the production of racial/ethnic disparities in school discipline. American Sociological Review, 87(6), 1007–1048.
53.
O’DayJ. A.BitterC. S.GomezL. M. (Eds.) (2011). Education reform in New York City: Ambitious change in the nation’s most complex school system. Harvard Education Press.
54.
PollockM. (2009). Colormute: Race talk dilemmas in an American school. Princeton University Press.
55.
Posey-MaddoxL. (2014). When middle-class parents choose urban schools: Class, race, and the challenge of equity in public education. University of Chicago Press.
56.
Posey-MaddoxL.KimelbergS. M.CucchiaraM. (2016). Seeking a ‘critical mass’: Middle-class parents’ collective engagement in city public schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(7), 905–927.
57.
PotterH.BurrisM. (2020). Here is what school integration in America looks like today. The Century Foundation.
58.
RaginC. C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press.
59.
RayV. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53.
60.
ReardonS. F.RhodesL. (2011). The effects of socioeconomic school integration plans on racial school desegregation. In FrankenbergE.DeBrayE. (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 187–208). University of North Carolina Press.
61.
ReardonS. F.YunJ. T.KurlaenderM. (2006). Implications of income-based school assignment policies for racial school segregation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 49–75.
62.
Sattin-BajajC.JenningsJ. L. (2022). Homelessness and school choice: Examining the school choice experiences of families living in shelter. Peabody Journal of Education, 97(1), 32–46.
63.
Sattin-BajajC.JenningsJ. L.CorcoranS. P.Baker-SmithE. C.HaileyC. (2018). Surviving at the street level: How counselors’ implementation of school choice policy shapes students’ high school destinations. Sociology of Education, 91(1), 46–71.
64.
Siegel-HawleyG. (2011). Is class working? Socioeconomic student assignment plans in Wake County, North Carolina, and Cambridge, Massachusetts. In FrankenbergE.DeBrayE. (Eds.), Integrating schools in a changing society: New policies and legal options for a multiracial generation (pp. 208–222). University of North Carolina Press.
SpillaneJ. P.ReiserB. J.ReimerT. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.
70.
TapiaE. (2024). Understanding school segregation through micro-changes: Evidence from upper secondary education in Stockholm. Journal of Education Policy, 39(5), 797–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2023.2288340
71.
TurnerE. O. (2015). Districts’ responses to demographic change: Making sense of race, class, and immigration in political and organizational context. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 4–39.
72.
TysonK. (2011). Integration interrupted: Tracking, black students, and acting white after Brown. Oxford University Press.
