Person-centered care has become a dominant paradigm in modern health care. It needs to be applied to people with end-stage kidney disease considering the initiation of dialysis and to peritoneal dialysis (PD) prescription and care delivery. It is relevant to their decisions about goals of care, transplantation, palliative care, and discontinuation of dialysis. It is also relevant to decisions about how PD is delivered, including options such as incremental PD. Shared decision-making is the essence of this process and needs to become a standard principle of care. It requires engagement, education, and empowerment of patients. Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported experience are also central to person-centered care in PD.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 2000.
2.
BarryMJEdgman-LevitanS. Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient centered care. N Engl J Med2012; 366: 780–781.
3.
HibbardJHStockardJMahoneyER, et al.Development of the patient activation measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers. Health Serv Res2004; 39: 1005–1026.
4.
GreeneJHibbardJHSacksR, et al.When patient activation levels change, health outcomes and costs change too. Health Aff2015; 34: 431–437.
5.
NesrallahGDixonSMacKinnonM, et al.Home palliative service utilization and care trajectory among Ontario residents dying on chronic dialysis. Can J Kidney Health Dis2018; 5. DOI: 10.1177/2054358118783761.
6.
FosterBMitssenefesMDahhouM, et al.Changes in excess mortality from end-stage renal disease in the United States from 1995–2010. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2018; 13: 91–99.
7.
AguiarRPeiMQureshiAR, et al.Health-related quality of life in peritoneal dialysis patients: a narrative review. Semin Dial2019; 32: 452–462. Epub ahead of print 21 December 2018. DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12770.
8.
TaylorDMFraserSDSBradleyJA, et al.A systematic review of prevalence and associations of limited health literacy in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2017; 12: 1070–1084.
9.
BezerraCILSilvaBCEliasRM. Decision making process in the pre-dialysis CKD patient: do anxiety, stress and depression matter?BMC Nephrol2018; 19(1): 98.
10.
HussainJAMooneyARussonL. Comparison of survival analysis and palliative care involvement in patients aged over 70 years choosing conservative management or renal replacement therapy in advanced chronic kidney disease. Palliat Med2013; 27: 817–821.
11.
MuthalagappanSJohannsonLKangWM, et al.Dialysis or conservative care for frail older patients: ethics of shared decision making. Nephrol Dial Transplant2013; 28: 2717–2722.
12.
BlakePGQuinnRROliverMJ. Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection. Perit Dial Int2013; 13: 233–241.
13.
OliverMJGargAXBlakePG, et al.Impact of contraindications, barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization. Nephrol Dial Transplant2010; 25: 2737–2744.
14.
BennettPNSt Clair RussellJAtwalJ, et al.Patient-to-patient peer mentor support in dialysis: improving the patient experience. Semin Dial2018; 31: 455–461.
15.
AmroOWRamasamyMStromJA, et al.Nephrologist-facilitated advance care planning for hemodialysis patients: a quality improvement project. Am J Kidney Dis2016; 68: 103–109.
16.
BieberSBurkartJGolperTA, et al.Comparative outcomes between continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review. Am J Kidney Dis2014; 63: 1027–1037.
17.
RabindranathKSAdamsJAliTZ, et al.Automated vs continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant2007; 22: 2991–2998.
18.
AnkawiGWoodcockNIJainAK, et al.The use of incremental peritoneal dialysis in a large contemporary peritoneal dialysis program. Can J Kidney Health Dis2017; 3: 2054358116679131. DOI: 10.1177/2054358116679131.
GarofaloCBorrelliSDe StefanoT, et al.Incremental dialysis in ESRD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nephrol2019; 32(5): 823–836.
21.
DemetriouDHabichtASchillingerM, et al.Adequacy of automated peritoneal dialysis with and without daytime exchange: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int2006; 70: 1649–1655.
22.
YanHFangWLinA, et al.Three versus 4 daily exchanges and residual kidney function decline in incident CAPD patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis2017; 69: 506–513.
23.
PaniaguaRAmatoDVoneshE, et al.Effect of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled, trial. J Am Soc Nephrol2002; 13: 1307–1320.
24.
LoWKHoYWLiCS, et al.Effect of Kt/V on survival and clinical outcome in CAPD patients in a randomized prospective study. Kidney Int2003; 64: 649–656.
25.
GorrinMRTeruel-BrionesJLVionVB, et al.Palliative peritoneal dialysis: implementation of a home care programme for terminal patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Nefrología2015; 35: 146–149.
26.
KazeleyASSimpsonKNChavinKD, et al.Barriers facing patients referred for kidney transplant cause loss to follow up. Kidney Int2012; 82: 1018–1023.
OliverMJQuinnRRRichardsonEP, et al.Home care assistance and utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int2007; 71: 673–678.
29.
MeeusFBrownEA. Caring for older patients on peritoneal dialysis at end of life. Perit Dial Int2015; 35: 667–670.
30.
MandelEIBernackiREBlockSD. Serious illness conversations in ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2017; 12: 854–863.
31.
DahlmusCQuinnMMessersmithE, et al.Patient perspectives on choice of dialysis modality: results from the empowering patients on choice for renal replacement therapy (EPOCH-RRT) study. Am J Kidney Dis2016; 68: 901–910.
32.
Joseph-WilliamsNElwynGEdwardsA. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns2008; 73: 526–535.
33.
PieterseAHStigelboutAMMontoriM. Shared decision making and impact of time. JAMA2019; 322: 25–26.
34.
CorbettRWGoodletGMacLarenB, et al.International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis Practice Recommendations: the view of the person who is doing or who has done PD. Perit Dial Int40(3): 349–354.
35.
TongALesmanaBJohnsonDW, et al.The perspectives of adults living with peritoneal dialysis: thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Am J Kidney Dis2013; 61: 873–888.
36.
de FijterCWHVan DiepenATNAmiriF, et al.Patient reported outcomes (PROs) argue against the limited use of peritoneal dialysis in end-stage renal disease. Clin Neph2018; 90: 94–101.
37.
ManeraKETongACraigJC, et al.Standardized outcomes in nephrology—peritoneal dialysis (SONG-PD): study protocol for establishing a core outcome set in PD. Perit Dial Int2017; 37: 639–647.
38.
ManeraKEJohnsonDWCraigJC, et al.Patients and caregiver priorities for outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: multinational nominal group technique study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol2019; 14: 74–83.
39.
ManeraKETongACraigJ, et al.An international Delphi survey helped develop consensus-based core outcome domains for trials in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int2019; 96: 699–710.
40.
BradyBMZhaoBNiuJ, et al.Patient-reported experiences of dialysis care within a national pay-for-performance system. JAMA Intern Med2018; 178: 1358–1367.
