In a retrospective study, the authors analysed the dialysis-technique success rate in 276 chronic renal patients. Of these, 137 patients have been treated with in center hemodialysis (CHD) from 1972 to 1989 and 139 with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) from 1978 to 1989. The six-year technique success rate was 28% in CAPD and 31% in CHD (statistically not significantly different). Various risk factors influence the technique-success rate of both methods in the same way. The results suggest that in our center CAPD is as effective as CHD in the treatment of patients with endstage renal failure.
OreopoulosD.G., RobsonM., FallerB., OgilvieR., RapoportA., de VeberG.A.Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: A new era in the treatment of chronic renal failure.Clinical Nephrology.1979; 11: 125–128.
BurtonP.R., WallsJ.Selection-adjusted comparison of life-expectancy of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, haemodialysis, and renal transplantation.Lancet.1987; 1: 1115–1119.
5.
MaiorcaR., CancariniG.C., CameriniC., BrunoriG., ManiliL., MovilliE., FellerP., MombelloniS.Is CAPD competitive with Haemodialysis for long-term treatment of Uraemic patients?Nephrol Dial Transplant.1989; 4: 244–253.
6.
MaiorcaR., CantalippiA., CancariniG.C., ScalamognaA., BroccoliR., GrazianiG., BrasaS., PonticelliC.Prospective controlled trial of a y connector and disinfectant in CAPD.Lancet.1983; 2: 642–644.
7.
LaplancheA., Com-NougueC., FlamantR., eds. Meth odes statistiques appliquées à la recherche clinique.Paris: FLAMMARION; 1987.
8.
CoxD.R.Regression models and life tables.J R Stat Soc (B).1972; 34: 187–220.
9.
BMDP statistical software.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. USA. 1986.
10.
BradleyJ.R., EvansD.B., CalneR.Y.Long-term survival in haemodialysis patients.Lancet.1987; 1: 295–296.
KurtzS.B., JohnsonW.J.A four-year comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis: A preliminary report.Mayo Clin Proc1984; 59: 659–662.
13.
RubinJ., BarnesT., BurnsP., RayR., TealN., HellemsE., BowerJ.Comparison of home hemodialysis to continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.Kidney Int.1983; 23: 51–56.
14.
WuG., KimD., OreopoulosD.G.The efficacy and adequacy of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.Ulster Med J.1985; 54: s48–s61.
15.
MaillouxL.U., BelluciA.G., MosseyR.T., NapolitanoB., MooreT., WilkesB.M., BluestoneP A.Predictors of survival in patients undergoing dialysis.Am J Med.1988; 84: 885–862.
HeatonA., RodgerR.S.C., SellarsL., GoodshipT.H.J., FletcherK., NikolakakisN., WardM.K., WilkinsonR., KerrD.N.S.Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis after the honeymoon: Review of experience in NewcastIe 1979–1984.Br Med J.1986; 293: 938–941.
18.
GokalR., JakubowskiC., KingJ., HuntL., BogIeS., BaillodR., MarshF., OggC., OliverD., WardM., WilkinsonR.Outcome in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis: 4 years analysis of a prospective multicentre study.Lancet.1987; 2: 1105–1109.
19.
GutmanR.A., BlumenkrantzM.J., ChanY.K., BarbourG.L., GandhiV.C., ShenF.H., TuckerT., MurawskiB.J., CoburnJ.W., CurtisF.K.Controlled comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: Veterans Administration multicenter study.Kidney I nt.1984; 26: 459–470.
20.
HeldP.J., PaulyM.V., DiamondL.Survival analysis of patients undergoing dialysis.JAMA.1987; 5: 645–650.
21.
MaiorcaR., VoneshE., CancariniG.C., CantaluppiA., ManiliL., BrunoriG., CameriniC., FellerP., StradaA.A six -year comparison of patient and technique survivals in CAPD and HD.Kidney Int.1988; 34: 518–524.
