Postcapitalist democratic economic planning (DEP) seeks to democratize economic decision-making. In response to the failures of central planning, DEP is vigilant lest the emergence of some new elite subvert its democratic and egalitarian aspirations. This article considers the possibility that economic expertise intended to support DEP may be means through which new elites are covertly encouraged. DEP advocates seek to safeguard DEP processes from elite control by proposing institutional oversight structures combined with enhanced subjective oversight capacities. In the case of economic expertise, we contend that these responses mitigate the possibility that economists’ analyses will have preferential implications but do not resolve this antidemocratic possibility. Economic expertise poses a problem of democratic accountability because its technical opacity impedes democratic oversight, thus enabling the covert design of economic analysis in ways that favour some groups over others. We conclude by arguing that reconsidering economic expertise in postcapitalism can attenuate this tension.
AkbulutBDufourMElias-PinsonnaultS, et al. (eds) (2027) Handbook on Postcapitalist Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2.
AlbertMHahnelR (1978) Unorthodox Marxism: An Essay on Capitalism, Socialism, and Revolution. Boston, MA: South End Press.
3.
AlbertMHahnelR (1979) A ticket to ride: More locations on the class map. In: WalkerP (ed.) Between Labor and Capital. Boston, MA: South End Press, pp.243–279.
4.
AlbertMHahnelR (1981a) Marxism and Socialist Theory. Boston, MA: South End Press.
5.
AlbertMHahnelR (1981b) Socialism Today and Tomorrow. Boston, MA: South End Press.
6.
AlbertMHahnelR (1991) The Political Economy of Participatory Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
ArboledaM (2021) Gobernar la utopía: sobre la planificación y el poder popular. Primera edición. Futuro Próximo 38. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Caja Negra.
8.
BastaniA (2019) Fully Automated Luxury Communism. New York: Verso.
9.
BenanavA (2021) Automation and the Future of Work. New York: Verso.
CastoriadisC (1983) The Greek polis and the creation of democracy. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal9(2): 79–115.
12.
CastoriadisC (1988) The relations of production in Russia. In: CastoriadisCAmes CurtisD (eds) Political and Social Writings. Volume 1, 1946-1955: From the Critique of Bureaucracy to the Positive Content of Socialism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp.107–58.
13.
ClaytonPArchieKMSachsJ, et al. (2021) The New Possible : Visions of Our World beyond Crisis. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.
14.
CockshottWPCottrellA (1993) Towards a New Socialism. Nottingham: Spokesman.
15.
DevineP (1988) Democracy and Economic Planning: The Political Economy of a Self-governing Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
16.
DjilasM (1983) The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich.
17.
EhrenreichBEhrenreichJ (1979) The professional-managerial class. In: WalkerP (ed.) Between Laborand Capital. Boston, MA: South End Press, pp.5–45.
18.
FishwickAKierseyN (eds) (2021) Postcapitalist Futures: Political Economy beyond Crisis and Hope. London: Pluto Press.
19.
HahnelR (2021) Democratic Economic Planning. Routledge Frontiers of Political Economy. London: Routledge.
20.
HahnelR (2022) A Participatory Economy. Chico, CA: AK Press.
21.
HardwigJ (1985) Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy82(7): 335–349.
22.
IkelerP (2024) Are services post-capitalist? A Marxian interrogation. Critical Sociology50(1): 11–29.
23.
IkelerPLimonicL (2018) Middle class decline? The growth of professional-managers in the neoliberal era. The Sociological Quarterly59(4): 549–570.
24.
Laurin-LamotheALegaultFTremblay-PepinS (2025) A brief sketch of four models of democratic economic planning. In: GroosJSorgC (eds) Creative Construction: Democratic Planning in the 21St Century and beyond. Bristol: Bristol University Press, pp.21–51.
25.
LefortC (2012) Machiavelli in the Making. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
26.
LeninVI (2003) One step forward, two steps back. In: Collected Works, vol. 7. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
27.
MandariniMToscanoA (2020) Planning for conflict. South Atlantic Quarterly119(1): 11–30.
28.
MasonP (2015) Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. London: Allen Lane.
29.
MorozovE (2019) Digital Socialism?New Left Review II(116): 33–67.
30.
Planning for Entropy (2022) Democratic economic planning, social metabolism and the environment. Science & Society86(2): 291–313.
31.
RifkinJ (2014) The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
32.
RussellED (2023) Keynesian expectations, epistemic authority and pluralism in economics: Placebo and nocebo effects in normal and abnormal times. Cambridge Journal of Economics47(2): 373–391.
33.
SandleM (2017) Soviet and Eastern bloc Marxism. In: GlaserDWalkerD (eds) Twentieth-century Marxism. New York: Routledge, pp.59–77.
34.
SarosD (2014) Information Technology and Socialist Construction: The End of Capital and the Transition to Socialism. London: Routledge.
35.
SicklesRCZelenyukV (2019) Measurement of Productivity and Efficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SorgC (2023) Failing to plan is planning to fail: Toward an expanded notion of democratically planned postcapitalism. Critical Sociology49(3): 475–493.
37.
VetteseTPendergrassD (2022) Half-Earth Socialism: A Plan to Save the Future from Extinction, Climate Change, and Pandemics. New York: Verso.
38.
WarkM (2019) Capital Is Dead: Is This Something Worse?New York: Verso.
39.
WinantG (2021) The Next Shift: The Fall of Industry and the Rise of Health Care in Rust Belt America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
YalcintasA (2016) Intellectual Path Dependence in Economics: Why Economists Do Not Reject Refuted Theories. New York: Routledge.
