Abstract
Background:
Current guidelines recommend consideration of thrombosis as a reversible cause of cardiac arrest. The use of thrombolytic therapy during cardiac arrest, however, is controversial.
Objective:
We sought to characterize the use of thrombolytic therapy during cardiac arrest and to evaluate the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in a “real-word” setting.
Methods:
A single-center, retrospective, cohort study of adult patients who received alteplase during cardiac arrest between 2010 and 2015 were performed at a tertiary academic medical center.
Results:
Twenty-six patients were identified. Patients were predominantly male (65%) and Caucasian (89%) and were a median age of 64 years. Five patients had a history of preexisting venous thromboembolism, and eight patients were receiving systemic anticoagulation. Pulmonary embolism was confirmed prior to the administration of alteplase in 5 patients. The median dose of alteplase administered was 100 mg. ROSC was achieved in 65% of patients, 2 of whom survived to hospital discharge. Both surviving patients experienced a bleeding event.
Conclusion:
In a single center’s experience, thrombolytic therapy is used infrequently for the management of cardiac arrest. Thrombolysis during cardiac arrest should be considered on a case-by-case basis and should be utilized only when there is a high suspicion for pulmonary embolism as the cause of arrest and when thrombolytic therapy is readily available.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.