Purpose: Children often experience the uncomfortable effects of invasive procedures as a part of primary care and during times of illness. Holistic comfort has been well documented in adult literature but little research exists on the understanding of holistic procedural comfort from the child’s perspective. In this study, holistic comfort related to an invasive venipuncture procedure was explored in children age 5 to 7 years and their caregivers of all ages. Design: A qualitative descriptive design described by Sandelowski was used. Method: The philosophical underpinnings of naturalistic inquiry of Guba and Lincoln were used. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 child and 15 caregiver participants. Children also drew pictures to help describe their perceptions. Findings: Traditional thematic content analysis described by Hsieh and Shannon yielded four overarching themes of holistic comfort related to venipuncture procedures in children: Body Comfort, Cognitive and Emotional Comfort, Comfort in the Procedure Surroundings, and Comfort Play. Conclusions: Numerous recommendations for future research are included. Implications for nursing and related health sciences, organizational and administrative policy, invasive procedures, theory, and methods were found and are discussed. Findings from this study will assist nurses in providing procedure management for children from a holistic care perspective.
BlumerH. (1980). Mead and Blumer: The convergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review, 45, 409-419.
8.
CarnevaleF. A.GuadreaultJ. (2013). The experience of critically ill children: A phenomenological study of discomfort and comfort. Dynamics, 24(1), 19-27.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CzarneckiM. L.TurnerH. L.CollinsP. M.DoellmanD.WronaS.ReynoldsJ. (2011). Procedural pain management: A position statement with clinical practice recommendations. Pain Management Nursing, 12, 95-111. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2011.02.003
12.
Dell’OrfanoS. (2002). The meaning of spiritual care in a pediatric setting. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 17, 380-385. doi:10.1053/jpdn.2002.129972
13.
EderD.FingersonL. (2002). Interviewing children and adolescents. In GubriumJ. F.HolsteinJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 181-202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
FreemanJ. (2005). Towards a definition of holism. British Journal of General Practice, 55, 154-155.
15.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases for naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology, 30, 233-252.
17.
HamiltonJ. (1989). Comfort and the hospitalized chronically ill. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 15(4), 28-33.
18.
HodginsM. J.LanderJ. (1997). Children’s coping with venipuncture. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 13, 274-285.
19.
HsiehH.ShannonS.E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
20.
KolcabaK. (1994). A theory of holistic comfort for nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 1178-1184.
21.
KolcabaK. (2013). Comfort. In PetersonS. J.BredowT. S. (Eds.), Middle range theories: Application to nursing research (3rd ed., pp. 193-209). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
22.
MarkhamJ. (1962). To comfort always. Nursing Times, 58, 894-896.
23.
MorseJ. M.BottorffJ. L.HutchinsonS. (1994). The phenomenology of comfort. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20, 189-195.
