Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine what client, needs assessor, and agency factors explain variation in decision making by long-term care needs assessors concerning clients requesting admission to a residential home.
Method: Hypothetical case vignettes were sent to needs assessors allocating services for the elderly. Multilevel logistic regression analysis provided random and fixed effects.
Results: The authors found random effects of the level of needs assessors are negligible, of the level of agencies small though statistically significant, clients receiving largest relative share of the variance. The amount of care already present appeared most important in the decision. Needs assessors were willing to support their clients’ wishes only when they were clearly motivated. Policy implications considering the tension between clients’ preferences and equity are discussed.
Braspenning, J., & Sergeant, J. (1994). General practitioners’ decision making for mental health problems: Outcomes and ecological validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47, 1365-1372.
2.
Breed Indicatie Overleg. (1997). Modelprotocol geïntegreerde indicatiestelling voor het terrein van wonen, welzijn en zorg [Comprehensive assessment protocol]. The Hague, the Netherlands: VNG Publishers.
3.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear model. Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Clark, J. A., Potter, D. A., & McKinlay, J. B. (1991). Bringing social structure back into clinical decision making. Social Science and Medicine, 32, 853-866.
5.
Commissie modernisering ouderenzorg. (1994). Ouderenzorg met toekomst [Future elderly care]. The Hague, the Netherlands: Ministry of Health.
6.
Degenholtz, H. B., Kane, R. A., Kane, R. L., & Finch, M. D. (1999). Long-term care case managers’ out-of-home placement decisions. An application of hierarchical logistic regression. Research on Aging, 21, 240-274.
7.
Degenholtz, H. B., Kane, R. A., & Kivnick, H. Q. (1997). Care-related preferences and values of elderly community-based LTC consumers: Can case managers learn what’s important to clients?The Gerontologist, 37, 767-776.
8.
De Heer, W. (1999). International response trends: Results of an international survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 15, 129-142.
9.
De Leeuw, E. D., & De Heer, W. (2002). Trends in household survey nonresponse: A longitudinal and international comparison. In R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, & R. J. A. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 41-142). New York: John Wiley.
10.
Dickinson, E. (1996). Long term care of older people. British Medical Journal, 312, 862-863.
11.
Dijkstra, G. J., Groothoff, J. W., & Post, D. (1999). Consideration of mental symptoms and physical disabilities in deciding upon placement in a residential home versus a nursing home. Tijdschrift Gerontolologie en Geriatrie, 30, 114-120.
12.
Eisenberg, J. M. (1979). Sociologic influences on decision-making by clinicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 90, 957-964.
13.
Feldstein, P. J. (1988). Health care economics. Albany, NY: Delmar.
14.
Fihn, S. D. (2000). The quest to quantify quality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1740-1742.
15.
Gianopoulos, C., Bolda, E. J., Baldwin, M., & Olsen, L. (2001). What works? Maine’s statewide uniform assessment and home care planning tells all. The Gerontologist, 41, 309-311.
16.
Goldman, H. H., Rachuba, L., & Van Tosh, L. (1995). Methods of assessing mental health consumers’ preferences for housing and support services. Psychiatric Services, 46, 169-172.
17.
Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
18.
Hennessy, C. H. (1993). Modeling case management decision-making in a consolidated long-term care program. The Gerontologist, 33, 333-341.
19.
Hox, J. J. (1995). Applied multilevel modeling. Amsterdam: TT-Publications.
20.
Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Kane, R. A., Degenholtz, H. B., & Kane, R. L. (1999). Adding values: An experiment in systematic attention to values and preferences of community long-term care clients. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B, S109-S119.
22.
Kish, L. (1987). Statistical design for research. New York: John Wiley.
23.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage.
24.
Luck, J., & Peabody, J. W. (2002). Using standardised patients to measure physicians’ practice: Validation study using audio recordings. British Medical Journal, 325, 679-682.
25.
Ludwick, R., & Zeller, R. A. (2001). The factorial survey: An experimental method to replicate real world problems. Nursing Research, 50, 129-133.
26.
Meiland, F. J., Danse, J. A., Hoos, A. M., Wendte, J. F., & Gunning-Schepers, L. J. (1996). The use of the waiting list in a fair selection of patients for nursing home care. Health Policy, 38, 1-11.
27.
Ministry of Health. (1997). Zorgindicatiebesluit [White paper]. Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 447. The Hague, Sdu: Author.
28.
Morrell, D. C., & Roland, M. O. (1990). Analysis of referral behaviour: Responses to simulated case histories may not reflect real clinical behaviour. British Journal of General Practice, 40, 182-185.
29.
Olesen, F. (1996). Physicians’ responses to patient vignettes: Are they valid?Family Medicine, 28, 7-8.
30.
Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Dresselhaus, T. R., & Lee, M. (2000). Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: A prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1715-1722.
31.
Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Healy, M., Cameron, B., & Charlton, C. (2000). MLWiN [Computer software]. London: Multilevel Models Project Institute of Education.
32.
Rossi, P. H., & Nock, S. L. (Eds.). (1982). Measuring social judgments. The factorial survey approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Rothman, K., & Greenland, S. (1998). Modern epidemiology (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven.
34.
Sandvik, H. (1995). Criterion validity of responses to patient vignettes: An analysis based on management of female urinary incontinence. Family Medicine, 27, 388-392.
35.
Schrijvers, A. J. P. (Ed.). (1997). Health and health care in the Netherlands. A critical self-assessment by Dutch experts in the medical and health sciences. Utrecht, the Netherlands: De Tijdstroom.
36.
Schrijvers, A. J. P., & Ravelli, D. P. (2000). RIO, het jongste kind. Tussenverslag van de evaluatie van het Zorgindicatiebesluit [Intermediate results of the RIO evaluation study]. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Julius Center.
37.
SER. (1999). Gezondheidszorg in het licht van de toekomstige vergrijzing [Health care and the aging population]. The Hague, the Netherlands: Sdu Uitgevers.
38.
Tweede kamer der Staten-Generaal. (2001). Modernisering AWBZ, Persoonsgebonden budget-ten. Brief van de staatssecretaris van volksgezondheid, welzijn en sport [Modernizing the Exceptional Medical Expenses Act], Vergaderjaar 2000-2001. The Hague: Sdu Publishers.
