Objectives: This article uses data from MIDUS (Midlife in the United States), a national study of Americans (N = 7,108), to investigate factors that predict longitudinal retention. With its extensive age range (25-75 at Time 1) and long-term design (9- to 10-year survey interval), MIDUS is useful for investigating common sociodemographic and health predictors of continuing participation. Method: The authors conducted logistic regression analyses of baseline sociodemographic and health variables predicting retention. Select interaction terms examined the interplay between targeted variables. Results: Consistent with prior research, higher retention rates were found among Whites, females, and married individuals as well as those with better health and more education. Interaction analyses further clarified that (a) health status better predicted retention among older compared to younger respondents and among women compared to men, (b) marital status better predicted retention among Whites compared to non-Whites and among women compared to men, and (c) economic status better predicted retention among those with poorer functional health status. Discussion: The authors’ analyses clarify that longitudinal retention varied depending on respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics and their health status. The unique contribution of this article is that factors predicting nonparticipation can be offset by, or compensated for, other factors.
Adams, M.M.E., Scherr, P.A., Branch, L.G., Herbert, L.E., Cook, N.R., Lane, A.M., et al. (1990). A comparison of elderly participants in a community survey with nonparticipants. Public Health Reports , 105, 617-622.
2.
Almeida, D.M., Neupert, S.D., Banks, S.R., & Serido, J. ( 2005). Do daily stress processes account for socioeconomic health disparities. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences , 60B(Special Issue II), 34-39.
3.
Badawi, M.A., Eaton, W.W., Myllyluoma, J., Weimer, L.G., & Gallo, J. ( 1999). Psychopathology and attrition in the Baltimore ECA 15-year follow-up 1981-1996. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology , 34, 91-98.
4.
de Graaf, R., Bijl, V.R., Smit, F., Ravelli, A., & Vollebergh, A.M. (2000). Psychiatric and sociodemographic predictors of attrition in a longitudinal study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152, 1039-1047.
5.
Farmer, M.E., Locke, B.Z., Liu, I.Y., & Moscicki, E.K. (1994). Depressive symptoms and attrition: The NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 4, 19-27.
6.
Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. ( 1998). An analysis of sample attrition in panel data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Journal of Human Resources , 33, 251-299.
7.
Goudy, W.J. ( 1985). Effects of sample attrition and data analysis in the Retirement History Study. Experimental Aging Research , 11, 161-167.
8.
Groves, R.M., & Couper M.P. ( 1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Groves, R.M., Presser, S., & Dipko, S. ( 2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions . Public Opinion Quarterly, 68, 2-31.
10.
Groves, R.M., Singer, E., & Corning, A. ( 2000). Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation . Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 299-308.
11.
Grzywacz, J.G., Almeida, D.M., Neupert, S.D., & Ettner, S.L. ( 2004). Socioeconomic status and health: A micro-level analysis of exposure and vulnerability to daily stressors. Journal of Health & Social Behavior, 45, 1-16.
12.
Hu, P., Adler, N.E., Goldman, N., Weinstein, M., & Seeman, T. ( 2005). Relationship of subjective assessment of socioeconomic status with measures of health in older Taiwanese persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 483-488.
13.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk . Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
14.
Kalton, G., Lepkowski, J., Montanari, G.E., & Maligalig, D. ( 1990). Characteristics of second wave nonrespondents in a panel survey. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association (Survey Research Methods Section), pp. 462-467.
15.
Kapteyn, A., Michaud, P., Smith, J., & van Soest, A. ( 2006, August). Effects of attrition and non-response in the Health and Retirement Study. Discussion paper from the Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany.
16.
Keppel, G. ( 1991). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
17.
Lepkowski, J.M., & Couper, M.P. ( 2002). Nonresponse in the second wave of longitudinal household surveys. In R. M. Grove, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge , & R. J. Little (Eds.), Survey nonresponse (pp. 259-272). New York: John Wiley.
18.
Lillard, L.A., & Panis, C.W.A. ( 1998). Panel attrition from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Household income, marital status, and mortality. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 437-457.
19.
Lindenberger, U., Gilberg, R., Little, T.D., Nuthmann, R., Potter, U., & Baltes, P.B. ( 1999). Sample selectivity and generalizability of the results of the Berlin Aging Study. In P. B. Baltes & K. U. Mater (Eds.), The Berlin Aging Study (pp. 56-82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Matthews, F.E., Chatfield, M., & Brayne, C. ( 2006). An investigation of whether factors associated with short-term attrition change or persist over ten years: Data from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Aging Study. BMC Public Health , 6, 185.
21.
May, R.B., Masson, M.E.J., & Hunter, M.A. ( 1990). Application of statistics in behavioral research . New York: Harper & Row.
22.
Mihelic, A.H., & Crimmins, E.M. (1997). Loss to follow-up in a sample of Americans 70 years of age and older: The LSOA 1984-1990. Journal of Gerontology, 52B, S37-S48.
23.
Neupert, S.D., Miller, L.S., & Lachman, M.E. ( 2006). Physiological reactivity to cognitive stressors: Variations by age and socioeconomic status. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 62, 221-235.
24.
Norris, F.H. ( 1985). Characteristics of older nonrespondents over five waves of a panel study. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 627-636.
25.
Powell, D.A., Furchtgott, E., Henderson M., Prescott, L., Mitchell, A., Hartis, P., et al. (1990). Some determinants of attrition in prospective studies on aging. Experimental Aging Research, 16, 17-24.
26.
Ryff, C.D., & Singer, B. ( 2005). Social environments and the genetics of aging: Advancing knowledge of protective health mechanisms. Journal of Gerontology , 60B(Special Issue 1), 12-23.
27.
Siegler, I.C., & Botwinick, J. ( 1979). A long-term longitudinal study of intellectual ability of older adults: The matter of selective subject attrition. Journal of Gerontology, 34, 242-245.
28.
Streib, G. ( 1966). Participants and dropouts in a longitudinal study . Journal of Gerontology, 21, 200-209.
29.
Tolonen, H., Helakorpi, S., Talala, K., Helasoja, V., Martelin, T., & Prattala, R. ( 2006). 25-year trends and sociodemographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. European Journal of Epidemiology, 21, 409-415.
30.
Tourangeau, R., & Ye, C. ( 2009). The framing of the survey request and panel attrition . Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 338-348.
31.
Vink, J.M., Willemsen, G., Stubbe, J.H., Middeldorp, C.M., Ligthart, R.S.L., Baas, K.D., et al. (2004). Estimating nonresponse bias in family studies: Application to mental health and lifestyle. European Journal of Epidemiology, 19, 623-630.
32.
Watson, D. ( 2003). Sample attrition between Waves 1 and 5 in the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review, 19, 361-378.
33.
Watson, N., & Wooden, M. ( 2006, July 12-14). Identifying factors affecting longitudinal survey response. Paper presented at the Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys Conference, University of Essex , Colchester.
34.
Winefield, A.H., Winefield, H.R., & Tiggemann, M. ( 1990). Sample attrition bias in a longitudinal study of young people. Australian Journal of Psychology, 42, 75-85.
35.
Zabel, J.E. ( 1998). An analysis of attrition in the PSID and the SIPP with an application to a model of labor market behavior. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 479-506.
