Bioindicators in the MIDUS National Study: Protocol,Measures,Sample,and Comparative Context

Abstract

Objectives: Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) is a national study of health and aging among individuals aged 25 to 74 at baseline (1995-1996). Longitudinal survey assessments (2004-2005), were followed by biological assessments on a subsample (aged 35-85).To facilitate public use, we describe the protocol, measures, and sample. Method: Respondents traveled to clinics for a 2-day data-collection protocol that included fasting blood specimens, 12-hr urine specimen, medical history, physical exam, bone densitometry, and a laboratory challenge (heart rate variability, blood pressure, respiration, salivary cortisol). Results: Response rates for the biological protocol (N = 1,255) were 39.3% or 43.1% (adjusting for those who could not be located or contacted). Reasons for nonparticipation were travel, family obligations, and being too busy. Respondents were comparable to the recruitment pool on most demographic characteristics and health assessments. Discussion: Strengths of the protocol vis-à-vis similar studies include opportunities to link biological factors with diverse content from other MIDUS projects.

Keywords

bioindicators comparative studies cross-project participation response rates

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almeida, D.M. , McGonagle, K. , & King, H. ( 2009). Assessing daily stress processes in social surveys by combining stressor exposure and salivary cortisol. Biodemography and Social Biology, 55, 220-238.

Brim, O.G. , Ryff, C.D. , & Kessler, R.C. ( 2004). The MIDUS National Survey: An overview. In O. G. Brim , C. D. Ryff , & R. C. Kessler (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife (pp. 1-36). Chicago : University of Chicago Press.

Chang, M. , Glei, D. , Goldman, N. , & Weinstein, M. ( 2008). The Taiwan biomarker project. In M. Weinstein , J. W. Vaupel , & K. W. Wachter (Eds.), Biosocial surveys (pp. 60-77). Washington, DC: National Academies Press (Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education).

Chicago Core on Biomarkers in Population-Based Aging Research. (n.d.). Studies collecting biomarkers in population settings . Retrieved May 30, 2010, from http://biomarkers.uchicago.edu/studiescollectingbiomarkers.htm

Christensen, K. , Bathum, L. , & Christiansen, L. (2008). Biological indicators and genetic information in Danish Twin and Oldest-Old Survey. In M. Weinstein , J. W. Vaupel , & K. W. Wachter (Eds.), Biosocial surveys (pp. 42-59). Washington, DC: National Academies Press (Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education).

Cushman, M. , Cornell, E.S. , Howard, P.R. , Bovill, E.G. , & Tracy, R.P. ( 1995). Laboratory methods and quality assurance in the Cardiovascular Health Study. Clinical Chemistry, 41, 264-270.

Harris, J.R. , Gruenewald, T.L. , & Seeman, T. ( 2008). An overview of biomarker research from community and population-based studies on aging. In M. Weinstein , J. W. Vaupel , & K. W. Wachter (Eds.), Biosocial surveys (pp. 96-135). Washington, DC: National Academies Press (Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education).

Fried, L.P. , Kronmal. R. A., Newman, A.B. , Bild, D.E. , Mittelmark, M.B. , Polak, J.F. , Robbins, J.A. , and Gardin, J.M. ( 1998). Risk Factors for 5-Year Mortality in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA, 279, 585-592.

Harris, T.B. , Launer, L.J. , Eiriksdottir, G. , Kjartansson, O. , Jonsson, P.V. , Sigurdsson, G. , et al. (2007). Age, Gene/Environment, Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study: Multidisciplinary applied phenomics. American Journal of Epidemiology, 165, 1076-1087.

10.

Hofman, A. , Grobbee, D.E. , De Jong, P.T.V. M., & VanDenOuweland, F.A. (1991). Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: The Rotterdam Elderly Study. European Journal of Epidemiology, 7, 403-422.

11.

Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. (n.d.). The National Archive of Computerized Data on Aging . Retrieved May 30, 2010, from http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/NACDA/

12.

Kasper, J.D. , Shapiro, S. , Guralnik, J.M. , Bandeen-Roche, K.J. , & Fried, L.P. ( 1999). Designing a community study of moderately to severely disabled older women: The Women’s Health and Aging Study. Annals of Epidemiology, 9, 498-507.

13.

Marmot, M. , & Steptoe, A. ( 2008). Whitehall II and ELSA: Integrating epidemiological and psychobiological approaches to the assessments of biological indicators. In M. Weinstein , J. W. Vaupel , & K. W. Wachter (Eds.), Biosocial surveys (pp. 15-41). Washington, DC: National Academies Press (Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education).

14.

Midlife in the United States. Retrieved June 28, 2010 from http://www.midus.wisc.edu

15.

National Institute on Aging. (n.d.). Database of longitudinal studies. Retrieved May 30, 2010, from http://www.nia.nih.gov/ResearchInformation/ScientificResources/LongitudinalStudies.htm

16.

Radler, B.T. , & Ryff, C.D. ( 2010). Who participates? Accounting for longitudinal retention in the MIDUS National Study of Well-being. Journal of Aging and Health, 22, 307-331.

17.

Ryff, C.D. , & Singer, B. ( 1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 1-28.

18.

Singer, B. , & Ryff, C.D. ( 2001). New horizons in health: An integrative approach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

19.

Tun, P.A. , & Lachman, M.E. ( 2008). Age differences in reaction time and attention in a national telephone sample of adults: Education, sex, and task complexity matter. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1421-1429.

20.

Weinstein, M. , Vaupel, J. W. , & Wachter, K. W. (Eds.). (2008). Biosocial surveys. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (Committee on Population, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education).