Abstract
Introduction
Hypertension, an increasingly important medical and public health issue, has long been recognized as one of the most important risk factors for stroke and death in older adult population (Moore, 2005; Mosley Ii & Lloyd-Jones, 2009; Rabkin, Mathewson, & Tate, 1978). Although all age groups are at risk of hypertension, studies have highlighted the increase in hypertension rates among aging population (Chobanian et al., 2003; Johnston, Propper, & Shields, 2009; Rampal, Rampal, Azhar, & Rahman, 2008), where more than 50% of people aged between 60 and 69 years and about 75% of those aged 70 years or older are affected (Chobanian et al., 2003). Similarly, it is widely acknowledged that hypertension is a major public health problem in Malaysia, especially among older adults (Mohd Sidik, Mohd Zulkefli, & Mustaqim, 2003; Rampal et al., 2008; Srinivas, Wong, Chia, Poi, & Ebrahim, 1998; Teo & Idris, 1996).
Although several studies have documented the role of heredity, lifestyle (Buck, Williams, Musick, & Sternthal, 2009), and socioeconomic status (SES; Gorman & Sivaganesan, 2007; Lim & Morad, 2004; Rampal et al., 2008) in the occurrence of hypertension, the relationship between aging and hypertension has a solid pathophysiological basis (McNeil & Silagy, 1991; Timby & Smith, 2004). Since the incidence of hypertension increases with age it is imperative to understand the factors contributing to hypertension in late life (Moore, 2005; Mosley Ii & Lloyd-Jones, 2009). In light of this consideration, the potential role of psychosocial factors, particularly loneliness in old age, is less well understood. The idea that loneliness may contribute to hypertension is slightly new and needs to be studied further.
Loneliness is defined as an individual’s subjective perception, both quantitatively or qualitatively, which results from lack of satisfying human relationships (Patterson & Veenstra, 2010; Tilvis, Laitala, Routasalo, & Pitkala, 2011). Similarly, it has been defined as a psychological experience with potentially adverse effects on biological stress processes (Steptoe, Owen, Kunz-Ebrecht, & Brydon, 2004).
Loneliness is well documented as a prevalent problem among older adults, due to life changes and losses in old age (Park & Chang, 2004), with a prevalence rate up to 40% (Holmén, Ericsson, Andersson, & Winblad, 1992; Savikko, 2008).
However, scientific investigations show that loneliness is negatively associated with physical and mental health (Park & Chang, 2004; Penninx et al., 1999); it has been neglected in the medical training and literature (Luanaigh & Lawlor, 2008; Paul & Ribeiro, 2009; van Ravesteijn, Lucassen, & van der Akker, 2008). Considering the association of loneliness with adverse health outcomes, increased attention should be paid to this topic.
This study aims to find the prevalence of loneliness among the community-dwelling older Malaysians as well as to determine the impact of loneliness on occurrence of hypertension among the said category of individuals. The results might persuade many doctors to pay increased attention to this topic. Findings may also encourage professionals working with older adults to design an effective program to reduce loneliness that may contribute toward lowering hypertension and preventing premature death in old age.
Method
The data presented in this paper were drawn from the Malaysian National Survey entitled “Patterns of Social Relationships and Psychological Well-Being Among Older Persons in Peninsular Malaysia” (PSRPWO), whose detailed methodology has been published elsewhere (Loke, Abdullah, Chai, Hamid, & Yahaya, 2011). In brief, the PSRPWO was a cross-sectional, face-to-face, interviewer-administered survey of 1,880 community residents aged 60 years or older from Peninsular Malaysia. A multistage cluster sampling technique was used to obtain a representative sample of Malaysian population. The characteristics of the sample broadly represented the general population of older people living in the community in Peninsular Malaysia. The survey collected several and diverse information, but for this article “loneliness and hypertension” were of special interest.
Measures
Loneliness
Loneliness was measured by the Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale (PGCMS) item, “How much do you feel lonely?,” with not much scored as 1 and a lot scored as 2 (Lawton, 1975); this item has previously been used in several studies to measure loneliness (Levy & Myers, 2005; Levy, Slade, Kunkel, & Kasl, 2002).
Hypertension and other chronic conditions
Hypertension and other chronic medical conditions were assessed by self-report questions concerning presence/absence of each condition. Interviewers asked respondents, “Have you ever been told by a doctor that you have the following chronic medical conditions?” This method is widely used in population studies and provides an accurate estimate of prevalence of chronic medical conditions (Goldman & Lin, 2003; Martin, Leff, Calonge, Garrett, & Nelson, 2000; Momtaz, Hamid, Yahaya, & Ibrahim, 2010).
Control Variables
In order to control for the potential confounding influence of age, sex, marital status, ethnicity, and educational attainment, these variables were used as covariates in logistic regression. We also adjusted for presence of diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease, and hypercholesterolemia.
Data Analysis
The preliminary analysis used chi-square tests to examine the associations between hypertension and specific risk factors. Logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio for the association between hypertension and loneliness, after controlling for possible sociodemographic factors such as age, sex, marital status, ethnicity, and chronic medical conditions, including hypercholesterolemia, kidney disease, heart disease, and diabetes. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, version 19) was used to carry out descriptive and inferential statistical analyses.
Results
The sample for this study consisted of 1,880 community-dwelling older Malaysians comprising 52.6% women and 47.4% men. Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics and health status of the sample. The mean age of the respondents was 69.8 years (SD = 7.36). Slightly more than 56% were married. In terms of loneliness, approximately one third (29.3%) of the respondents reported that they experience “a lot” of loneliness.
Sociodemographic Characteristics and Health Status of the Sample
The overall prevalence of hypertension among older Malaysians was found to be 39% (95% CI = 36.9-41.3; Table 2). This rate was found to be as high as 44% (95% CI = 39.9-47.6) for those in the age range between 70 and 79 years and close to 32% (95% CI = 25.8-38.1) for those who were 80 years of age or older. Further findings showed that 35.4% (95% CI = 32.2-38.5) of men and 42.4% of women (95% CI = 39.3-45.4) reported having hypertension. The prevalence of hypertension among the 551 respondents who reported a lot of loneliness was 45.4 (95% CI = 41.2-49.5).
Distribution of Population According to Hypertension Status
Note: n = 1,880.
To evaluate association between hypertension, loneliness, sociodemographic factors, and chronic medical conditions, a series of chi-square tests were conducted that confirmed hypertension is not uniformly distributed across the older population. As shown in Table 2, the results of chi-square tests identified that hypertension is significantly associated with loneliness (χ2 = 13.12, p ≤ .001); sociodemographic factors, including age (χ2 = 11.26, p ≤ .01), sex (χ2= 9.68, p ≤ .01), marital status (χ2= 9.70, p ≤ .01), ethnicity (χ2 = 9.64, p ≤ .01); and chronic medical conditions, including hypercholesterolemia (χ2 = 68.18, p ≤ .001), kidney disease (χ2 = 4.78, p ≤ .05), heart disease (χ2 = 57.30, p ≤ .001), and diabetes (χ2 = 203.06, p ≤ .001).
Logistic Regression
To control for possible confounding variables, a multivariate logistic regression model was conducted to examine effect of loneliness on hypertension. Table 3 illustrates the results from logistic regression analyses of potential risk factors for hypertension. Adjusting for sociodemographic factors and chronic medical conditions, results of logistic regression revealed older persons who reported a lot of loneliness (OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.04-1.66) had a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension as compared with older person with low level of loneliness, after controlling for possible sociodemographic and health factors. In other words, after controlling for possible confounding variables, the odds of hypertension for older persons with a lot of loneliness were 1.31 times greater than older persons with low loneliness. The other sociodemographic factors associated with hypertension included age (OR = 1.29, p ≤ .05, 95% CI = 1.02-1.63), sex (OR = 1.30, p ≤ .05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.65), ethnicity (OR = 2.01, p ≤ .01, 95% CI = 1.54-2.62), and education (OR = 1.45, p ≤ .05, 95% CI = 1.00-2.12). In addition, those with heart disease (OR = 2.15, p ≤ .001, 95% CI = 1.52-3.04), hypercholesterolemia (OR = 5.50, p ≤ .001, 95% CI = 3.47-8.72), and diabetes (OR = 5.09, p ≤ .001, 95% CI = 3.90-6.64) were more likely to report hypertension.
Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) of Hypertension Among Older Malaysians
Note: Hosmer and Lemeshow Test: χ2(8) = 14.00, p > .05, Nagelkerke R2 = .22.
p ≤ .05. **p ≤ .001.
IUSD was equivalent to RM 3.75 at time of the data collection.
Discussion
This study is one of the few studies that investigated the impact of loneliness on hypertension in later life. The overall prevalence of self-reported hypertension in the current study (39%) was consistent with previous national (Rampal et al., 2008) and international (Heath, Browning, & Reed, 1999) rates. However, it was found to be much lower than the finding from a study among a group of older adults in Taiwan, where prevalence rates of hypertension were 53.09% in men and 56.06% in women (Lai et al., 2001). In addition, the prevalence rates of hypertension among older Americans and Canadians aged 65 years or older were 53.8% and 48.0%, respectively (Kaplan, Huguet, Feeny, & McFarland, 2010). In general, the findings from this study in line with previous scientific investigations illustrate a high prevalence rate of hypertension in old age.
Almost one third of our participants admitted to a lot of loneliness, which is consistent with the results of several other prevalence studies of loneliness in later life, where the rate of loneliness was found to be as high as 40% (Routasalo & Pitkala, 2003). In a Finnish survey, 39% of the 4,000 older persons surveyed reported feelings of loneliness (Routasalo, Savikko, Tilvis, Strandberg, & Pitkala, 2006). In addition, the prevalence of loneliness among older people in China was estimated at 29.6% in 2000 (Yang & Victor, 2008).
Overall, the result of our study supported previous studies documenting loneliness as a common and serious issue among older adults (Alma et al., 2011; Hawkley, Masi, Berry, & Cacioppo, 2006; Hawkley, Thisted, Masi, & Cacioppo, 2010; Routasalo & Pitkala, 2003; Theeke, 2009; William Lauder, Sharkey, & Mummery, 2004; Yang & Victor, 2008).The main purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between loneliness and the diagnosis of hypertension. The result of logistic regression, after controlling for confounding variables, supported that loneliness significantly increases the likelihood of hypertension in later life. This result was again consistent with the findings from both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies that showed that loneliness is associated with hypertension and coronary heart disease (CHD; Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2007; Hawkley et al., 2006, 2010; Sorkin, Rook, & Lu, 2002; Wang et al., 2011). The findings from the study conducted by Sorkin and colleagues found a significant association between loneliness and heart condition status, after controlling for other chronic health problems.
Although the mechanism by which loneliness causes hypertension is unclear (O’Luanaigh et al., 2012), it is possibly mediated through psychobiological pathways involving central nervous system activation of neuroendocrine, autonomic, and immune responses (Wang et al., 2011). In addition, there is some evidence that loneliness is associated with blunted autonomic response to stress, increased total peripheral resistance (TPR; Cacioppo et al., 2002), and raised levels of HbA1c (O’Luanaigh et al., 2012), and, consequently, hypertension.
The neuroendocrine pathways triggers several mechanisms, including activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system (HPA; Hawkley, Bosch, Engeland, Marucha, & Cacioppo, 2007), which are a result of elevated stress response linked with loneliness. The activation of HPA leads to an elevation in the stress hormone (cortisol) levels, which in turn leads to hypertension (Adams, Hawkley, Kudielka, & Cacioppo, 2006). Cortisol is also associated with several clotting factors, such as fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor (von Kanel, Mills, Fainman, & Dimsdale, 2001); consequently, these clotting factors increase the risk of hypertension.
Furthermore, lonely individuals are more vulnerable to stressors encountered in daily life (Hawkley & Cacioppo, 2003) and exhibit symptoms such as chronic changes in the autonomic nervous system, including an elevated sympathetic-adrenergic activation that leads to an elevation in stress responses, and hence, a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (Sorkin et al., 2002). This occurs via an increased vascular resistance coupled with age-related decrease in vascular compliance of the blood vessels and, consequently, leads to an increase in blood pressure (Cacioppo, 2009).
Other possible explanations include the likelihood that lonely individuals may be less inclined to utilize medical services or to use blood pressure medication (Hawkley et al., 2006). The lowering of services by medical care professionals to lonely clients also increases elevation in blood pressure as shown in a case–control study conducted by Cacioppo et al. (Cacioppo, Hawkley, & Berntson, 2003), wherein physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff provided better or more complete medical care to obviously nonlonely patients than to patients who appeared to be socially isolated. Although we did not include weight and body mass index of our participants, it has been shown that increased body mass index (BMI) is associated with hypertension. The result of a large cross-sectional survey (n = 1,289 adults; mean age = 46.3 years) revealed that lonely individuals had a higher mean BMI and a greater proportion of overweight/obese individuals than the nonlonely group (Lauder, Mummery, Jones, & Caperchione, 2006).
The last possible cause that may shed light on the effect of loneliness on blood pressure is depression. There is a growing body of literature that shows that loneliness significantly accentuates depression (Nolen-Hoeksema & Ahrens, 2002; Park & Chang, 2004). Consequently, several scientific investigations have found that depression is statistically linked to increased odds of hypertension and myocardial infarction (Jonas, Franks, & Ingram, 1997; Yary et al., 2010).
In summary, current findings, in line with existing knowledge, supported the idea that loneliness is one of the most important possible factors for increases in blood pressure levels in older adults.
Limitation and Implications
There are several strengths and limitations to this study that should be addressed. The strength of the study is mainly in the large representative sample of the older Malaysians population. The major limitation of this study includes the cross-sectional design, which rules out concluding that there is a causal relationship between loneliness and hypertension. The second limitation is the use of self-reported chronic medical conditions. A further limitation of this study involves the method used to measure loneliness, a single-item subjective self-report of loneliness; however, previous studies have found that this method is also an adequate measure of loneliness (Chlipala, 2008).
Although the associations between loneliness and common psychiatric problems in older adults have been previously studied (Golden et al., 2009; Vink et al., 2009; Vink, Aartsen, & Schoevers, 2008), the present study is constrained by the use of secondary data that did not measure depression and anxiety. In this case, it was not possible to determine either the associations of loneliness with anxiety and depression or the unique contribution of loneliness toward the two psychiatric conditions. Therefore, this limitation presents a unique avenue for the researchers to consider these variables in a follow-up study and for future research to determine whether loneliness can be a proxy marker for depression and anxiety or a better indicator for hypertension than either depression or anxiety.
Despite these limitations, to our knowledge, the present study is one of the few that addressed the relationship between loneliness and hypertension in later life. One of the most important practical implications of this study is that all mental health and other health professionals involved in geriatric care must be aware of the negative physiological effect of loneliness on hypertension and so should pay increased attention on this topic. In future, further prospective case–control study need to be done before a causal relationship can be established. Loneliness is a modifiable risk factor that can be improved through a social intervention program that may contribute to lowering the incidence of hypertension in old age. In addition, it should be treated as a “geriatric giant,” due to its potential in causing mortality and morbidity; therefore, detection of loneliness is crucial in management and treatment of older patients.
Footnotes
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The researchers would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation for the financial support under Grant No: 04-01-04-SF0479.
