Memory Fades,But Roles Remain: Gendered Dyadic Coping and Marital Satisfaction Among Chinese Couples Navigating Mild Cognitive Impairment

Abstract

Background: This study investigates how dyadic coping interacts with gender identity and within-couple gender ideology (dis)similarity to influence marital satisfaction in 202 heterosexual married couples with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Research Design: We utilized cross-sectional dyadic data and actor–partner interdependence moderation models to examine the interactions between dyadic coping, gender ideology (dis)similarity, and gender identity. Results: The results revealed positive associations between dyadic coping and marital satisfaction for both persons with mild cognitive impairment (PwMCIs) and their spouse care partners (SCPs). Two-way interactions indicated that: (1) the association between a SCP’s dyadic coping and their own marital satisfaction was moderated by the couple’s gender composition; and (2) the association between a PwMCI’s dyadic coping and their own marital satisfaction was moderated by ideological dissimilarity with their spouse. Conclusions: These findings inform culturally sensitive interventions and extend dyadic health theory in non-Western contexts.

Keywords

marriage dyadic coping mild cognitive impairment gender Chinese couples

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berg

C. A.

Upchurch

(2007). A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin, 133(6), 920–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.920

Bodenmann

(1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology / Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie / Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 54(1), 34–49.

Bodenmann

(2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar: Testmanual [Dyadic Coping Inventory: Test manual]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

Bodenmann

Plancherel

Beach

S. R. H.

Widmer

Gabriel

Meuwly

Charvoz

Hautzinger

Schramm

(2008). Effects of coping-oriented couples therapy on depression: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 944–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013467

Braun

Scholz

Bailey

Perren

Hornung

Martin

(2009). Dementia caregiving in spousal relationships: A dyadic perspective. Aging & Mental Health, 13(3), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860902879441

Calasanti

Bowen

M. E.

(2006). Spousal caregiving and crossing gender boundaries: Maintaining gendered identities. Journal of Aging Studies, 20(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2005.08.001

Calasanti

King

(2007). Taking ‘Women’s Work’ ‘Like a Man’: Husbands’ experiences of care work. The Gerontologist, 47(4), 516–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/47.4.516

Cheung

A. K.-L.

Choi

S. Y.-P.

(2016). Non-traditional wives with traditional husbands: Gender ideology and husband-to-wife physical violence in Chinese society. Violence Against Women, 22(14), 1704–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216632615

Curran

M. A.

McDaniel

B. T.

Pollitt

A. M.

Totenhagen

C. J.

(2015). Gender, emotion work, and relationship quality: A daily diary study. Sex Roles, 73(3–4), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0495-8

10.

Davis

S. N.

Greenstein

T. N.

(2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920

11.

Deutsch

F. M.

(2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21(1), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206293577

12.

Falconier

Kuhn

(2019). Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00571

13.

Ferree

M. M.

(2010). Filling the glass: Gender perspectives on families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00711.x

14.

Field

Mountain

Burgess

Di Bona

Kelleher

Mundy

Wenborn

(2019). Recruiting hard to reach populations to studies: Breaking the silence: An example from a study that recruited people with dementia. BMJ Open, 9(11), Article e030829. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030829

15.

Friedemann

M.-L.

Buckwalter

K. C.

(2014). Family caregiver role and burden related to gender and family relationships. Journal of Family Nursing, 20(3), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840714532715

16.

Garcia

R. L.

Kenny

D. A.

Ledermann

(2015). Moderation in the actor–partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships, 22(1), 8–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12060

17.

Hayes

A. F.

(2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Second edition). The Guilford Press.

18.

Heise

Greene

M. E.

Opper

Stavropoulou

Harper

Nascimento

Zewdie

Darmstadt

G. L.

Greene

M. E.

Hawkes

Heise

Henry

Heymann

Klugman

Levine

Raj

Rao Gupta

(2019). Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: Framing the challenges to health. Lancet (London, England), 393(10189), 2440–2454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X

19.

Hilpert

Randall

A. K.

Sorokowski

Atkins

D. C.

Sorokowska

Ahmadi

Alghraibeh

A. M.

Aryeetey

Bertoni

Bettache

Blazejewska

Bodenmann

Borders

Bortolini

T. S.

Butovskaya

Castro

F. N.

Cetinkaya

Cunha

David

O. A.

Yoo

(2016). Corrigendum: The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-Nation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106

20.

Kaplan

D. B.

Berkman

(2011). Dementia care: A global concern and social work challenge. International Social Work, 54(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872810396255

21.

Kenny

Kashy

Cook

(2006). The analysis of dyadic data: Guilford.

22.

Kiecolt-Glaser

J. K.

Wilson

S. J.

(2017). Lovesick: How couples’ relationships influence health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13(1), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045111

23.

Kline

(2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Fourth edition). Guilford publications.

24.

Kung

L.-C.

(2009). The study of relationship between adolescents’ and intergenerational gender roles and marital attitudes: An example of vocational high school students in Kaohsiung county [unpublished master’s thesis]. National Kaohsiung Normal University.

25.

Cao

Curran

M. A.

Fang

Zhou

(2020). Traditional gender ideology, work family conflict, and marital quality among Chinese dual-earner couples: A moderated mediation model. Sex Roles, 83(9–10), 622–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01125-1

26.

Jin

Kelley

H. H.

Cao

Zhou

Holmes

Yorgason

(2024). Work-family conflicts and perceived fairness of housework division in dual-earner couples during COVID-19. Sex Roles, 90(1), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01422-5

27.

Livingston

Sommerlad

Orgeta

Costafreda

S. G.

Huntley

Ames

Ballard

Banerjee

Burns

Cohen-Mansfield

Cooper

Fox

Gitlin

L. N.

Howard

Kales

H. C.

Larson

E. B.

Ritchie

Rockwood

Sampson

E. L.

Mukadam

(2017). Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet (London, England), 390(10113), 2673–2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6

28.

Milligan

Morbey

(2016). Care, coping and identity: Older men’s experiences of spousal care-giving. Journal of Aging Studies, 38, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2016.05.002

29.

Minnotte

K. L.

Minnotte

M. C.

Pedersen

D. E.

Mannon

S. E.

Kiger

(2010). His and her perspectives: Gender ideology, work-to-family conflict, and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 63(5–6), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9818-y

30.

O’Shaughnessy

Lee

Lintern

(2010). Changes in the couple relationship in dementia care: Spouse carers’ experiences. Dementia, 9(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301209354021

31.

Petersen

R. C.

(2016). Mild cognitive impairment. Continuum, 22(2), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000000313

32.

Petersen

R. C.

Doody

Kurz

Mohs

R. C.

Morris

J. C.

Rabins

P. V.

Ritchie

Rossor

Thal

Winblad

(2001). Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Archives of Neurology, 58(12), 1985–1992. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.12.1985

33.

Randall

A. K.

Donato

Neff

L. A.

Totenhagen

C. J.

Bodenmann

Falconier

(2023). A scoping review on couples’ stress and coping literature: Recognizing the need for inclusivity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 812–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221101904

34.

Ridgeway

C. L.

(2009). Framed before we know it: How gender shapes social relations. Gender & Society, 23(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208330313

35.

Ridgeway

C. L.

Smith-Lovin

(1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.191

36.

Shek

D. T. L.

Lam

M. C.

Tsoi

K. W.

Lam

C. M.

(1993). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Kansas marital satisfaction scale. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 21(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1993.21.3.241

37.

Sun

Mutlu

Coon

(2014). Service barriers faced by Chinese American families with a dementia relative: Perspectives from family caregivers and service professionals. Clinical Gerontologist, 37(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2013.868848

38.

Thomeer

M. B.

Reczek

Umberson

(2015). Gendered emotion work around physical health problems in mid- and later-life marriages. Journal of Aging Studies, 32, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2014.12.001

39.

Thomeer

M. B.

Umberson

Pudrovska

(2013). Marital processes around depression: A gendered and relational perspective. Society and Mental Health, 3(3), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156869313487224

40.

Thomeer

M. B.

Umberson

Reczek

(2020). The gender-as-relational approach for theorizing about romantic relationships of sexual and gender minority mid‐ to later‐life adults. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(2), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12368

41.

Whitlatch

C. J.

Orsulic-Jeras

Johnson

(2021). Challenges to and strategies for recruiting chronic care dyads into intervention research. Chronic Illness, 17(3), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395319869434

42.

Hilpert

Randall

A. K.

Bodenmann

(2016). Validation of the dyadic coping inventory with Chinese couples: Factorial structure, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Psychological Assessment, 28(8), e127–e140. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000329

43.

Chau

P. H.

McGhee

S. M.

Cheung

W. L.

Chan

K. C.

Cheung

S. H.

Woo

(2012). Trends in prevalence and mortality of dementia in elderly Hong Kong population: Projections, disease burden, and implications for long-term care. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2012(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/406852

44.

Zhan

H. J.

(2004). Through gendered lens: Explaining Chinese caregivers’ task performance and care reward. Journal of Women & Aging, 16(1–2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1300/J074v16n01_09

45.

Zygouri

Cowdell

Ploumis

Gouva

Mantzoukas

(2021). Gendered experiences of providing informal care for older people: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 730. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06736-2