Comparison of Standard Radiography and Computed Tomography in 21 Dogs with Maxillary Masses

Abstract

Imaging of patients with oral cancer is required to determine tumor extension in order to assist in prognosis and surgical planning. Conventional screen-film radiography (SFR) used to be the most common method for oral assessment, but computed tomography (CT) has become more available and is being used for obtaining complementary information. CT examinations eliminate superimposition by acquiring cross-sectional images of the region of interest. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of SFR compared with CT examinations for evaluation of oral masses in dogs. Twenty-one dogs received head and thorax SFR, and pre- and post-contrast head CT. Bony changes were observed in 80.9 % and 95.2 % of the cases in SFR and CT studies, respectively. Invasion of adjacent structures (i.e. nasal cavity, frontal and sphenoidal sinuses, orbit, maxillary recess, nasopharynx) was observed in only 30 % of cases with SFR while CT showed 90.4 % involvement. CT is an important preoperative examination modality and is more effective in identifying bone changes and tumor invasion of adjacent structures compared with SFR.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dorn

Taylor

DON

. Survey of animal neoplasms in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. I. Methodology and description of cases. J Natl Cancer Inst 1968a; 40: 307–318.

Verstraete

FJM

. Mandibulectomy and maxillectomy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2005; 35: 1009–1039.

Morris

Dobson

. Cabeça e pescoço. In: Morris

Dobson

, eds. Oncologia em pequenos animais. 1st ed. São Paulo: Roca, 2007; 105–118.

Séguin

. Tumors of the mandible, maxilla, and calvarium. In: Slatter

, eds. Textbook of small animal surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2003; 2488–2502.

Forrest

Thrall

. Oncologic applications of diagnostic imaging techniques. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1995; 25: 185–205.

Sande

. Radiography, myelography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 811–831.

Kosovsky

Matthiesen

. Results of partial mandibulectomy for the treatment of oral tumors in 142 dogs. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 397–401.

Frew

Dobson

. Radiological assessment of 50 cases of incisive or maxillary neoplasia in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1992; 33: 11–18.

Wallace

Matthiesen

Patnaik

. Hemimaxillectomy for the treatment of oral tumors in 69 dogs. Vet Surg 1992; 21: 337–341.

10.

Mantis

Baines

. Computed tomography: Why use it in small animal practice? Vet J 2007; 173: 237–238.

11.

Sande

. Radiography, myelography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 811–831.

12.

Tidwell

Jones

. Advanced imaging concepts: A pictorial glossary of CT and MRI technology. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1999; 14: 65–111.

13.

Widmer

. Alternate imaging for the diagnosis of cancer In: Morrison

, eds. Cancer in dogs and cats – medical and surgical management. 2nd ed. Hong Kong: Teton New Media, 2001; 177–201.

14.

Oakes

Lewis

. Canine oral neoplasia. Compend Contin Educ Vet 1993; 15: 15–30.

15.

Dhaliwal

Kitchell

Marretta

. Oral tumors in dogs and cats. Part I. Diagnosis and Clinical signs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1998a; 20: 1011–1021.

16.

Forrest

. University of Illinois. Veterinarians build better ‘mouse trap’ for enhanced diagnosis. news. illinois.edu/news/11/0330device_RobertO'Brien.html

17.

Albuquerque

MAP

Chojniak

Cavalcanti

MGP

. Patologia – lesões malignas In: Cavalcanti

, eds. Diagnóstico por imagem da face. 1st ed. São Paulo: Santos, 2008; 339–383.

18.

Malard

Toquet

. Computed tomography in TN stage evaluation of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Clin Imaging 2004; 28: 360–367.

19.

Hathcock

Newton

. Computed tomographic characteristics of multilobular tumor of bone involving the cranium in 7 dogs and zygomatic arch in 2 dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000; 41: 214–217.

20.

Banks

Straw

. Multilobular osteochondrosarcoma of the hard palate in a dog. Aust Vet J 2004; 82: 409–412.

21.

Kim

Nakaichi

. Primary chondrosarcoma in the skull of a dog. J Vet Sci 2007; 8: 99–101.

22.

Seiler

Rossi

. Computed tomographic features of skull osteomyelitis in four young dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007; 48: 544–549.

23.

Forrest

L J

. The head: Excluding the brain and orbit. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 1999; 14: 170–176.

24.

Jeffery

Thakkar

Yarrow

. Introduction to computed tomography of the canine brain. J Small Anim Pract 1992; 33: 2–18.

25.

Kafka

UCM

Carstens

. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for oral masses in dogs. J S Afr Vet Assoc 2004; 75: 163–168.

26.

Rumboldt

Day

Michel

. Imaging of oral cavity cancer. Oral Oncol 2006; 42: 854–865.

27.

Vos

Gaag

. Canine and feline oral-pharyngeal tumours. J Vet Med 1987; 34: 420–427.

28.

Todoroff

Brodey

. Oral and pharyngeal neoplasia in the dog: A retrospective survey of 361 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1979; 175: 567–571.

29.

Dorn

Taylor

. Survey of animal neoplasms in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. II. Cancer morbidity in dogs and cats from Alameda County. J Natl Cancer Inst 1968b; 40: 295–305.

30.

Stopiglia

Felizzola

. Estudo clínico e anátomo patológico das formações neoplásicas e não neoplásicas da cavidade bucal de cães. Comunicação científica da Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia da Universidade de São Paulo 1992; 16: 33–39.