Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) imaging currently gains increased interest in human as well as veterinary medicine. The ability to image 3-dimensional (3D) biopsy specimens nondestructively down to 1 µm spatial resolution makes it a promising tool for microscopic tissue evaluation in addition to histopathology. Visualizing tumor margins and calculating tumor load on 3D reconstructions may also enhance oncological therapies. The objective of this study was to describe the workflow from tumor resection to histopathological diagnosis, using both routine hematoxylin-eosin (HE)-stained sections and micro-CT tomograms on a stage II oral fibrosarcoma in a 7-year-old Hovawart dog. The maxillectomy specimen was fixed with formalin and stained with an X-ray dense soft tissue contrast agent. Micro-CT imaging was done using an ex vivo specimen micro-CT device. Tumor margins could not be exactly determined on micro-CT tomograms due to limited image resolution and contrast. Histopathology was performed after washing out the contrast agent. It showed neoplastic cells infiltrating the surrounding tissue further than assumed from micro-CT images. A total tumor volume of 10.3 cm3 could be calculated based on correlating micro-CT tomograms with HE-stained sections. This correlative approach may be of particular interest for oncological therapy. More than that, micro-CT imaging technology supported histopathology by means of 3D orientation and selection of slices to be cut on determining tumor margins. In this clinical case report, micro-CT imaging did not provide unambiguous clinical evidence for oncological decision-making, but it showed potential to support histopathology and calculate tumor volume for further clinical use.
De RyckeLMBooneMNvan CaelenbergAI, et al.Micro-computed tomography of the head and dentition in cadavers of clinically normal rabbits. Am J Vet Res. 2012;73(2):227–232. doi:10.2460/ajvr.73.2.227
2.
HoldsworthDWThorntonMM. Micro-CT in small animal and specimen imaging. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20(8):34–39. doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(02)02004-8
3.
AsutayFPolatSGülMSubaşıCKahramanSAKaraözE. The effects of dental pulp stem cells on bone regeneration in rat calvarial defect model: micro-computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(12):1729–1735. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.09.002
4.
GuillaumeBLacosteJPGaboritN, et al.Microcomputed tomography used in the analysis of the morphology of root canals in extracted wisdom teeth. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;44(3):240–244. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.05.009
5.
BarbierAMartelCde VernejoulMC, et al.The visualization and evaluation of bone architecture in the rat using three-dimensional X-Ray microcomputed tomography. J Bone Miner Metab. 1999;17(1):37–44. doi:10.1007/s007740050061
6.
VersianiMACristescuRCSaquyPCPécoraJDDe Sousa-NetoMD. Enamel pearls in permanent dentition: case report and micro-CT evaluation. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2013;42(6). doi:10.1259/dmfr.20120332
7.
VersianiMAPécoraJDSousa NetoMD. The anatomy of two-rooted mandibular canines determined using micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2011;44(7):682–687. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01879.x
8.
LiHZhangHTangZHuG. Micro-computed tomography for small animal imaging: technological details. Prog Nat Sci. 2008;18(5):513–521. doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.01.002
9.
BadeaCTDrangovaMHoldsworthDWJohnsonGA. In vivo small-animal imaging using micro-CT and digital subtraction angiography. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(19): R319–R350. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/R01
10.
StockSR. Recent advances in X-ray microtomography applied to materials. Int Mater Rev. 2008;53(3):129–181. doi:10.1179/174328008X277803
11.
KastnerJPlankBHeinzlC. Advanced X-ray computed tomography methods: high resolution CT, quantitative CT, 4DCT and phase contrast CT. Digit Ind Radiol Comput Tomogr (DIR 2015) 22-25 June 2015, Belgium, Ghent. 2015: 120–132. Accessed December 22, 2017. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e922/d5047492f9f9da73f30648e43034021531fc.pdf
12.
AmesJJHendersonTLiawLBrooksPC. Methods for analyzing tumor angiogenesis in the Chick Chorioallantoic Membrane Model. In: CaoJ, ed. Breast Cancer. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol 1406. Humana Press; 2016:255–269. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3444-7_22
13.
DowkerSEPDavisGRElliottJCWongFSL. X-ray microtomography: 3-dimensional imaging of teeth for computer-assisted learning. Eur J Dent Educ. 1997;1(2):61–65.
14.
GuYZhangYLiaoZ. Root and canal morphology of mandibular first premolars with radicular grooves. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58(11):1609–1617. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.07.014
15.
BonsmannAStoffelMHBurkhartMHattJM. Anatomical atlas of the Quail’s Ear (Coturnix coturnix). Anat Histol Embryol. 2015;45(5):399–404. doi:10.1111/ahe.12198
16.
DeleonVBSmithTD. Mapping the nasal airways: using histology to enhance CT-based three-dimensional reconstruction in Nycticebus. Anat Rec. 2014;297(11):2113–2120. doi:10.1002/ar.23028
17.
FitzpatrickNGarciaTCDaryaniABertranJWatariSHayashiK. Micro-CT structural analysis of the canine medial coronoid disease. Vet Surg. 2016;45(3):336–346. doi:10.1111/vsu.12449
18.
KitahashiTMutohMTsurusakiM, et al.Imaging study of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas in Syrian hamsters using X-ray micro-computed tomography (CT). Cancer Sci. 2010;101(7):1761–1766. doi:10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01588.x
19.
SouzaMJGreenacreCBAvenellJSWallJSDanielGB. Diagnosing a tooth root abscess in a guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) using micro computed tomography imaging. J Exot Pet Med. 2006;15(4):274–277. doi:10.1053/j.jepm.2006.09.007
20.
EvansEESouzaMJ. Advanced diagnostic approaches and current management of internal disorders of select species (rodents, sugar gliders, hedgehogs). Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2010;13(3):453–469. doi:10.1016/j.cvex.2010.05.003
21.
SasaiHIwaiHFujitaDSetoEIzumiY. The use of micro-computed tomography in the diagnosis of dental and oral disease in rabbits. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:209. doi:10.1186/s12917-014-0209-4
22.
ZhaoCKuritaHKurashinaKHosoyaAAraiYNakamuraH. Temporomandibular joint response to mandibular deviation in rabbits detected by 3D micro-CT imaging. Arch Oral Biol. 2010;55(12):929–937. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.07.019
23.
MetscherBDWeningerWGeyerS, et al.MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues. BMC Physiol. 2009;9(1):11. doi:10.1186/1472-6793-9-11
24.
GignacPMKleyNJClarkeJA, et al.Diffusible iodine-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography (diceCT): an emerging tool for rapid, high-resolution, 3-D imaging of metazoan soft tissues. J Anat. 2016;228(6):889–909. doi:10.1111/joa.12449
25.
WithrowSVailDPageR. Small Animal Clinical Oncology. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.2125.833
26.
VerstraeteFJM. Mandibulectomy and maxillectomy. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2005;35(4):1009–1039. doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2005.03.005
27.
EmmsSG. The management of oral tumours in dogs and cats. Aust Vet J. 1987;64(1):22–25. doi:10.1111/j.1751-0813.1987.tb06052.x
28.
LascellesBThomsonMDernellWStrawRLaffertyMWithrowS. Combined dorsolateral and intraoral approach for the resection of tumors of the maxilla in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2003;39(3):294–305. doi:10.5326/0390294
29.
LascellesBHendersonRSeguinB. Bilateral rostral maxillectomy and nasal planectomy for large rostral maxillofacial neoplasms in six dogs and one cat. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2004;40(2):137–146.
30.
WithrowSJNelsonAWManleyPABiggsDR. Premaxillectomy in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1985;21(1):49–55.
31.
WhiteRASGormanNTWatkinsSBBrearleyMJ. The surgical management of bone-involved oral tumours in the dog. J Small Anim Pract. 1985;26(12):693–708. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.1985.tb02198.x
32.
SalisburySKRichardsonDCLantzGC. Partial maxillectomy and premaxillectomy in the treatment of oral neoplasia in the dog and cat. Vet Surg. 1986;15(1):16–26. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.1986.tb00168.x
33.
WhiteRAS. Mandibulectomy and maxillectomy in the dog: long term survival in 100 cases. J Small Anim Pract. 1991;32(2):69–74. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.1991.tb00917.x
34.
WallaceJMatthiesenDTPatnaikAK. Hemimaxillectomy for the treatment of oral tumors in 69 dogs. Vet Surg. 1992;21(5):337–341. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.1992.tb01707.x
35.
SchwarzPDWithrowSJCurtisCRPowersBEStrawRC. Partial maxillary resection as a treatment for oral cancer in 61 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1991;27(6):617–623.
RitmanEL. Molecular imaging in small animals—roles for micro-CT. J Cell Biochem. 2002;39:116–124. doi:10.1002/jcb.10415
38.
MizutaniRSuzukiY. X-ray microtomography in biology. Micron. 2012;43(2-3):104–115. doi:10.1016/J.MICRON.2011.10.002
39.
HandschuhSBeisserCJRuthensteinerBMetscherBD. Microscopic dual-energy CT (microDECT): a flexible tool for multichannel ex vivo 3D imaging of biological specimens. J Microsc. 2017;267(1):3–26. doi:10.1111/jmi.12543
40.
JohnsonJTHansenMSWuI, et al.Virtual histology of transgenic mouse embryos for high-throughput phenotyping. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(4): e61. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020061
41.
ClarkDPBadeaCTModingEJKirschDGBadeaCT. In vivo characterization of tumor vasculature using iodine and gold nanoparticles and dual energy micro-CT related content spectral diffusion: an algorithm for robust material decomposition of spectral CT data. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(6):1683–1704. Accessed November 30, 2017. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9155/58/6/1683/pdf
42.
CnuddeVMasschaeleBDe CockHE, et al.Virtual histology by means of high-resolution X-ray CT. J Microsc. 2008;232(3):476–485. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02142.x
CavanaughDJohnsonEPriceREKurieJTravisELCodyDD. In vivo respiratory-gated micro-CT imaging in small-animal oncology models. Mol Imaging. 2004;3(1):55–62. doi:10.1162/153535004773861723
46.
JagannathSVelasquezWSTuckerSL, et al.Tumor burden assessment and its implication for a prognostic model in advanced diffuse large-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4(6):859–865. Accessed October 26, 2016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2423653
