Financial Measures in Nonprofit Organization Research: Comparing IRS 990 Return and Audited Financial Statement Data

Abstract

The IRS 990 Return is becoming an increasingly prominent source of financial data underlying descriptions of the nonprofit sector and studies of nonprofit organizations. However, questions about the quality of the data continue to be of concern. This study of 350 nonprofit organizations investigates the adequacy, reliability, and appropriate interpretation of IRS 990 Return data through comparisons of selected entries with corresponding measures from each organization’s audited financial statements. Both quantitative and qualitative methods are used to examine and explain the consistency between the two data sources. The study concludes that the IRS 990 Return can be considered an adequate and reliable source of financial information for many types of investigations, but preparers and users of the data need a clearer understanding of its purposes to enable appropriate interpretations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson, A. J. (1995). Sources of data on nonprofit finance. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 5, 443-451.

Bowen, W. G. , Nygren, T. I. , Turner, S. E. , & Duffy, E. A. (1994). The charitable nonprofits. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chang, C. F. , & Tuckman, H. P. (1990). Why do nonprofit managers accumulate surpluses, and how much do they accumulate? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 1, 117-135.

Cordes, J. J. , & Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). Differential taxation of nonprofits and the commercialization of nonprofit revenues. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 195-214.

Froelich, K. A. , & Knoepfle, T. W. (1996). Internal Revenue Service 990 data: Fact or fiction? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 40-52.

Gorman, M. , & Tanenbaum, J. (1993). New rules proposed for joint activities of NPOs. Journal of Accountancy, 176(4), 103-108.

Gronbjerg, K. A. (1989). Developing a universe of nonprofit organizations: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18, 63-80.

Gronbjerg, K. A. (1994). The NTEE: Human service and regional applications. Voluntas, 5, 301-328.

Hodgkinson, V. A. , & Weitzman, M. S. (1996). Nonprofit almanac: Dimensions of the independent sector (5th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Hodgkinson, V. A. , Weitzman, M. S. , Noga, S. M. , & Gorski, H. A. (1993). A portrait of the independent sector: The activities and finances of charitable organizations. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.

11.

Orend, R. J. , O’Neill, M. , & Mitchell, C. S. (1997). State nonprofit data bases: Lessons from the California experience. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7, 447-454.

12.

Oster, M. (1998). Executive compensation in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 8, 207-221.

13.

Skelly, D. , & Steurele. E. (1992). The nonprofit sector and taxes: Invaluable and largely untapped research data bases. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2, 429-438.

14.

Steinberg, R. (1987). Nonprofit organizations and the market. In W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 118-138). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

15.

Tuckman, H. P. , & Chang, C. F. (1991). Amethodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 445-460.

16.

Tuckman, H. P. , & Chang, C. F. (1993). How well is debt managed by nonprofits? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3, 347-361.

17.

Tuckman, H. P. , & Chang, C. F. (1998). How pervasive are abuses in fundraising among nonprofits? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9, 211-221.

18.

Weisbrod, B. A. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

19.

Young, D. R. , Bania, N. , & Bailey, D. (1996). Structure and accountability: Astudy of national nonprofit associations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 347-365.