The purpose of this study is to determine whether nonprofits that serve a membership (that is, mutual nonprofits) have more in common with cooperatives (also member-oriented associations) than with nonprofits that are oriented toward the public. A MANOVA was used to analyze the effect of organizational type of which there were four categories (publicly oriented nonprofits, mutual nonprofits, cooperatives without shares, and cooperatives with shares) on the five dependent measures (social objectives, volunteer participation, democratic decision making, government dependence, and market reliance) derived from the social economy framework. The results offer some support for the hypothesis that serving a membership is an important factor in the basic characteristics of an organization, and that is true regardless of whether the incorporation is nonprofit or cooperative. However, charitable status also appeared to influence on the results. The implications for the social economy and civil society are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Co-operatives Secretariat. (1998). Co-operatives in Canada (1996). Ottawa: Government of Canada.
2.
Craig, J.
(1993). The nature of co-operation. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose.
3.
Dees, J. G.
(1998, January-February). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 55-67.
4.
Defourney, J.
(1988). De la coopération à l’économie sociale [Of cooperation and the social economy]. Proceedings of the Congreso de Co-opertivisimo, University of Duesto and the World Basque Congress, 71-88.
5.
Defourny, J.
, & Monzon Campos, J. (Eds.). (1992). The third sector: Co-operative, mutual and nonprofit organizations. Brussels, Belgium: CIRIEC, DeBoeck University.
6.
Ellerman, D.
(1982). The socialization of entrepreneurship. Boston: Industrial Cooperative Association.
7.
Ellerman, D.
(1990). The democratic worker-owned firm. Boston: HarperCollins.
8.
Febbraro, A. R.
, Hall, M., & Parmegiani, M. (2000). Developing a typology of the voluntary health sector in Canada: Definition and classification issues. Toronto: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
9.
Green, D.
(1993). Reinventing civil society: The rediscovery of welfare without politics. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit.
Hirshhorn, R.
(1997). What are nonprofits? In Ronald Hirshhorn (Ed.), The emerging sector: In search of a framework (pp. 5-6). Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
12.
International Co-operative Alliance. (1997). Constitution: Article 5 [Online]. Available: http://www.ica.coop.org
13.
Jeantet, T. (1991). économie sociale et coopératives [Social economy and cooperatives economics]. Unpublished manuscript.
14.
Keane, J.
(1998). Civil society: Old images, new visions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
Lewin, K.
(1935). A dynamic theory of personality; selected papers by Kurt Lewin. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
MacPherson, I.
(1979). A history of the co-operative movement in English-Canada: 1900-1945. Toronto, Canada: MacMillan.
17.
Martin, S.
(1985). An essential grace: Funding Canada’s health care, education, welfare, religion and culture. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
18.
Putnam, R.
(1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
Putnam, R.
(1995, January). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
20.
Putnam, R.
(1996). The decline of civil society: How come? So what?Ottawa: John L. Manion Lecture.
21.
Putnam, R.
(2000). The collapse and revival of American communities. New York: Simon and Schuster.
22.
Quarter, J.
(1992). Canada’s social economy: Co-operatives, non-profits and other community enterprises. Toronto, Canada: James Lorimer.
23.
Quarter, J.
(2000). Beyond the bottom line: Socially innovative business owners. Westport, CT: Greenwood/Quorum.
24.
Quarter, J.
, Richmond, B. J., Sousa, J., & Thompson, S. (in press). An analytic framework for classifying the organizations of the social economy. In K. Banting (Ed.), The nonprofit sector in Canada. Kingston: School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University, and McGill-Queen’s University Press.
25.
Quarter, J.
, & Richmond, B. J. (in press). Accounting for social value in non-profits and for-profits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership.
26.
Richmond, B. J. (1999). Counting on each other: Asocial audit model to assess the impact of nonprofit organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.
27.
Rothschild-Whitt, J.
(1982). The collective organization: An alternative to bureaucratic models. In F. Lindenfeld and J. Rothschild Whitt (Ed.), Workplace Democracy and Social Change (pp. 23-49). Boston: Porter Sargent.
28.
Salamon, L.
(1987). Partners in public service: The scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 99-117). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
Salamon, L.
(1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
30.
Seligman, A.
(1998). Between public and private: Towards a sociology of civil society. In R. Hefner (Ed.), Democratic civility (pp. 79-111). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
31.
Sharpe, D.
(1994). A portrait of Canada’s charities. Toronto: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
32.
Smith, D. H.
(1997). The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in the prevailing “flat earth” maps of the sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 114-131.
33.
Smith, S. R.
, & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Snaith, I.
(1991). The économie sociale in the New Europe. In Yearbook of co-operative enterprise (pp. 65-75). Oxford, UK: Plunkett Foundation for Co-operative Studies.
