Very small nonprofit organizations are typically omitted from sector accounts, because neither the IRS nor the Bureau of Census collect data on these groups. Arguably, this may not pose a major problem. Prevailing economic theories in the nonprofit field direct attention to larger and more formal service-providing organizations. From an economic point of view, very small and informal organizations are of lesser importance. However, social capital and civil society arguments have focused renewed attention on informal, voluntaristic groups, many of which are likely small in scale and thus being missed in existing data sources. This article presents data from a community study of cultural organizations, comparing small-scale groups to larger organizations to contribute to our understanding of the economic dimensions of the nonprofit sector's grassroots base.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Borkman, T. J. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual aid: Experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2.
Brilliant, E. (2001). The American third sector at the end of the twentieth century: Public and private revisited. In H. Anheier & J. Kendall (Eds.), Third sector policy at the crossroads (pp. 168-182). London: Routledge.
3.
Colwell, M. A. C. (1997). The potential for bias when research on voluntary associations is limited to 501(c)3 organizations (Nonprofit Sector Research Fund Working Paper Series). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
4.
Grønbjerg, K. A., & Nelson, S. (1998). Mapping small religious nonprofit organizations: An Illinois profile. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(1), pp. 13-31.
5.
Hansmann, H. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835-901.
6.
Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1993). Measuring the non-profit sector in the US economy: Conceptual framework and methodology. Voluntas, 4(2), 141-162.
7.
Jackson, M. R. (1998). Arts and culture indicators in community building: Project update. Journal of Arts Management, Law, & Society, 28(3), 201-205.
8.
Kaple, D., Rivkin-Fish, Z., Louch, H., Morris, L., & DiMaggio, P. (1998). Comparing sample frames for research on arts organizations: Results of a study in three metropolitan areas. Journal of Arts Management, Law, & Society, 28(1), 41-66.
9.
McCarthy, K., Brooks, A., Lowell, J., & Zakaras, L. (2001). The performing arts in a new era. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
10.
National Center for Charitable Statistics. (n.d.). Guide to Using NCCS data. Retrieved January 9, 2002 from http://nccs.urban.org/guide.htm.
11.
National Endowment for the Arts. (1998). 1997 survey of public participation in the arts (Research Division Report No. 39). Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.
12.
Peters, M., & Cherbo, J. M. (1998). The missing sector: The unincorporated arts. Journal of Arts Management, Law, & Society, 28(2), 115-128.
13.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.
15.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
16.
Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: The theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1/2), 29-49.
17.
Salamon, L. M. (1999). America's nonprofit sector: A primer. New York: Foundation Center.
18.
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1996). The emerging sector. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
19.
Salamon, L. M., & Dewees, S. (2002). In search of the nonprofit sector: Improving the state of the art. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45(11), 1716-1740.
20.
Smith, D. H. (1997). The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in prevailing “flat earth” maps of the sector. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 114-131.
21.
Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Tice, H. S., Salamon, L. M., & List, R. A. (2001). Finding a sacred bard: Portraying the global nonprofit sector in official statistics (Center for Civil Society Studies Working Paper No. 19). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
23.
Toepler, S. with G. Finch. (2001). The arts and humanities in Montgomery County: An empirical profile. Preliminary summary results from the National and Local Profiles of Cultural Support Survey. In Jerry Allen & Associates Creative Montgomery: A vision for the arts and humanities in Montgomery County, MD (Appendix A). Bethesda, MD: Arts and Humanities Council of Montgomery County.
24.
Van Til, J. (2000). Growing civil society: From nonprofit sector to third space. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
25.
Weisbrod, B. (1975). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. In E. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, morality, and economic theory (pp. 171-195). New York: Russell Sage.
