Few topics in nonprofit research and practice have received greater attention in recent years than organizational effectiveness. In spite of this intellectual interest, little consensus has emerged, either theoretically or empirically, as to what constitutes organizational effectiveness and how best to measure it. In this article, we introduce a multidimensional and integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness (MIMNOE). The model captures two prominent dimensions of organizational effectiveness, management effectiveness and program effectiveness. In addition, to illustrate how this framework can be used empirically, the article proposes a method of analysis that exploits the interrelationships between the multiple dimensions in the model. MIMNOE is useful for both scholars and practitioners because it requires attention not only to program outcomes, but also equally to the factors that influence those outcomes.
Ammar, S., Duncombe, W. D., Hou, Y., Jump, B., & Wright, R. (2001). Using fuzzy rule-based systems to evaluate overall financial performance of governments: An enhancement of the bond rating process. Public Budgeting and Finance, 21, 91-110.
2.
Argyris, C. (1964). Integrating the individual and the organization. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Arum, R. (1996). Do private schools force public schools to compete?American Sociological Review, 61, 29-46.
4.
Au, C. (1996). Rethinking organizational effectiveness: Theoretical and methodological issues in the study of organizational effectiveness for social welfare organizations. Administration in Social Work, 20, 1-21.
5.
Bennis, W. G. (1966). Changing organizations: Essays on the development and evolution of human organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Boschken, H. L. (1994). Organizational performance and multiple constituencies. Public Administration Review, 54, 308-312.
7.
Cameron, K. (1978). Assessing organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 604-632.
8.
Cameron, K. (1981). Domains of organizational effectiveness in colleges and universities. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 25-47.
9.
Cameron, K. (1982). The relationship between faculty unionism and organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 6-24.
10.
Cameron, K., & Whetten, D. (Eds.). (1983). Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Campbell, J. P. (1977). On the nature of organizational effectiveness. In P. S. Goodman, J. M. Pennings, & Associates (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. (pp. 13-55). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Cascio, W. F. (1982). Costing human resources: The financial impact of behavior in organizations. Boston: Kent.
13.
Chalos, P., & Cherian, J. (1995). An application of data envelopment analysis to public sector performance management and accountability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14, 143-160.
14.
Connolly, T., Conlon, E., & Deutsch, S. (1980). Organizational effectiveness: A multiple-constituency approach. Academy of Management Review, 5, 211-217.
15.
D’Aunno, T. (1992). The effectiveness of human service organizations: A comparison of the models. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 341-361). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
D’Aunno, T., Sutton, R. I., & Price, R. H. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 636-661.
17.
Davidson, L. (1998). Measure what you bring to the bottom line. Workforce, 77, 34-40.
18.
Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configuration performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 802-836.
19.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
20.
Etzioni, A. A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal of Legislation, 28, 465-498.
22.
Fitz-enz, J. (1994). HR’s new score card. Personnel Journal, 73, 84-87.
23.
Forbes, D. P. (1998). Measuring the unmeasurable: Empirical studies of nonprofit organization effectiveness from 1977-1997. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 183-202.
24.
Goodman, P. S., Atkins, R. S., & Schoorman, F. D. (1983). On the demise of organizational effectiveness studies. In K. Cameron & D. Whetten (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models (pp. 163-183). New York: Academic Press.
25.
Goodman, P. S., Pennings, J. M., & Associates (Eds). (1977). New perspectives on organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Gronbjerg, K. A. (1993). Understanding nonprofit funding: Managing revenues in social services and community development organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Hall, R. H. (1999). Organizations: Structures, processes, and outcomes (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). Obstacles to comparative studies. In P. S. Goodman, J. M. Pennings & Associates. New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 106-131). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29.
Hasenfeld, Y. (1983). Human service organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Hasenfeld, Y., & Weaver, D. (1996). Enforcement, compliance, and disputes in welfare-to-work programs. Social Service Review, 70, 235-256.
31.
Heinrich, C. J. (1999). Do government bureaucrats make effective use of performance management information?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 363-394.
32.
Heinrich, C. J., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. (1999, April). Governance and program performance: Empirical results from the job training and partnership act (JTPA). Paper presented at Workshop on Models and Methods for the Empirical Study of Governance, University of Arizona, Tucson.
33.
Heinrich, C. J., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2001a, October). Improving the organization, management, and outcomes of substance abuse treatment programs. Paper presented at the 6th National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.
34.
Heinrich, C. J., & Lynn, L. E., Jr. (2001b). Means and ends: A comparative study of empirical methods for investigating governance and performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 109-138.
35.
Herman, R. D. (1990). Methodological issues in studying the effectiveness of nongovernmental and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19, 293-306.
36.
Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1997). Multiple constituencies and the social construction of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26, 185-206.
37.
Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1998). Nonprofit organizational effectiveness: Contrasts between especially effective and less effective organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9, 23-38.
38.
Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (1999). Theses on nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 107-126.
39.
Hill, C. J. (2003). Impacts, outcomes, and management in welfare-to-work programs. Unpublished working paper, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
40.
Ingraham, P. W., & Donahue, A. K. (2000a). Dissecting the black box revisited: Characterizing government management capacity. In C. J. Heinrich & L. E. Lynn, Jr. (Eds.), Governance and performance: New perspectives (pp. 292-318). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
41.
Ingraham, P. W., & Donahue, A. K. (2000b). Dissecting the black box: Toward a model and measures of government management performance. In J. Brudney, L. O’Toole, Jr., & H. G. Rainey, (Eds.), Advancing public management: New developments in theory, methods, and practice (pp. 235-252). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
42.
Ingraham, P. W., & Moynihan, D. P. (2001). Beyond measurement: Measuring for results in state government. In D. Forsythe (Ed.), Quicker, better, cheaper? Managing performance in American government (pp. 309-335). Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
43.
Jreisat, J. E. (1991). The organizational perspective in comparative and development administration. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development public administration (pp. 15-23). New York: Marcel Dekkar.
44.
Kanter, R. M., & Summers, D. V. (1987). Doing well while doing good: Dilemmas of performance measurement in nonprofit organizations and the need for a multiple constituency approach. In W. W. Powell (Ed), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 154-166). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
Kaplan, D., & Elliott, P. R. (1997). A didactic example of multilevel structural equation modeling applicable to the study of organizations. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 1-24.
46.
Keeley, M. (1978). A social justice approach to organizational evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 272-292.
47.
Kushner, R. J., & Poole, P. P. (1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7, 119-136.
48.
Letts, C. W., Ryan, W. P., & Grossman, A. (1999). High performance nonprofit organizations: Managing upstream for greater impact. New York: John Wiley.
49.
Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
50.
Lin, A. C. (2000). Reform in the making: The implementation of social policy in prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
51.
Markowich, M. M. (1995). HR’s leadership in the third wave era. HRMagazine, 40, 92.
52.
Martinez, M. N. (1996). 3 strategies for successful business partners. HRMagazine, 41, S1.
53.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure and myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 340-363.
54.
Miles, R. H. (1980). Macro-organizational behavior. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
55.
Ostrander, S. A., & Schervish, P. G. (1990). Giving and getting: Philanthropy as a social relation. In J. VanTil (Ed.), Critical issues in American philanthropy (pp. 67-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56.
Ostroff, C., & Schmitt, N. (1993). Configurations of organizational effectiveness and efficiency. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1345-1361.
57.
Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Boston: Pittman.
58.
Phillips, J. J. (1996). Accountability in human resource management. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
59.
Price, J. L. (1972). The study of organizational effectiveness. Sociological Quarterly, 13, 3-15.
60.
Price J. L. (1977). The study of turnover. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
61.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Productivity Review, 2, 122-140.
62.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29, 363-377.
63.
Rainey, H. G. (1997). Understanding and managing public organizations (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
64.
Rainey, H. G., & Steinbauer, P. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 1-32.
65.
Rojas, R. R. (2000). A review of models for measuring organizational effectiveness among for-profit and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11, 97-104.
66.
Salamon, L. M. (1997). Holding the center: America’s nonprofit sector at the crossroads. New York: Nathan Cummings Foundation.
67.
Sandfort, J. (1999). The structural impediments to human service collaboration: Examining welfare reform at the front lines. Social Service Review, 73, 314-339.
68.
Sandfort, J. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 729-756.
69.
Scarr, S. M., Eisenberg, M., & Deater-Deckard, K. (1994). Measurement of quality in child care centers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 9, 131-151.
70.
Scott, W. R. (1977). Effectiveness of organizational effectiveness studies. In P. S. Goodman, J. M. Pennings, & Associates (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 63-95). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72.
Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
73.
Seashore, S. E., & Yuchtman, E. (1967). Factorial analysis of organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 377-395.
74.
Selden, S. C., & Moynihan, D. P. (2000). A model of voluntary turnover in state government. Review of Public Personal Administration, 20, 63-75.
75.
Steers, R. M. (1975). Problems in the measures of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 546-558.
76.
Stone, M. M., Bigelow, B., & Crittenden, W. (1999). Research on strategic management in nonprofit organizations: Synthesis, analysis, and future directions. Administration& Society, 31, 378-423.
77.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
Ulrich, D. (1997). Measuring human resources: An overview of practice and a prescription for results. Human Resource Management, 36, 303-320.
79.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense making in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
80.
Zammuto, R. (1984). Assessing organizational effectiveness: Systems change, adaptation, and strategy. Albany: University of New York Press.
