Nonprofits as Social Capital and Agents in the Public Policy Process: Toward a New Paradigm

Abstract

This article explores a new, universal, and theoretically inclusive approach to understanding the performance and purpose of nonprofit organizations in today’s world. This approach envisions the nonprofit organization as a social capital asset and agent in a specific relationship to the public. This relationship is depicted in a principal-agent paradigm and the performance is in the public policy process. The public policy arena is the nonprofit’s analogy of the firm’s marketplace. Nonprofits do more than fill in for market or government failures. They also regulate, facilitate, assist, and modify markets and play a significant role in every aspect of public policy, that is, from determining party platforms to the implementation of policies. In the public policy process, they have a comparative advantage as agents of citizens and firms.

Keywords

public policy nonprofits social capital

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ben-Ner, A. , & Gui, B. (1993). Introduction. The nonprofit sector in the mixed economy (p. 6). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Bryce, H. J. (2000). Financial and strategic management for nonprofit organizations. San Diego, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bryce, H. J. (2005). Players in the public policy process: Nonprofits as social capital and agents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dahl, R. A. ,& Lindblom, C. E. (1953). Politics, economics and welfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.

Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835-898.

Lasswell, H. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when and how. New York: McGraw-Hill, Meridian Books.

Oster, S. (1995). Strategic management for nonprofit organizations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions of collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

11.

Sanger, M. B. (2001). When the private sector competes (Policy Brief No. 3). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

12.

Trinidad v. Sagrada Orden, 263 U.S. 578, 581, 44 S. Ct. 204, 205, 68 L. Ed. 458 (1924).

13.

Wilson, J. (1989). What government agencies do and why they do it New York: Basic Books.