The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering behavior. A second purpose is to examine these effects across different survey methodologies. Using data from Indiana households, a multimethod, multigroup research design was used to compare giving and volunteering across eight different survey methodologies. Results indicate important differences in philanthropic behaviors by gender, race, marital status, and survey methodology—even when controlling for differences in income, age, and educational attainment. These results highlight the importance of looking specifically at human and social capital variables, and survey methodology, when making assumptions about and interpreting the measurement of philanthropic behavior.
Anderson, V. L. (1993). Gender differences in altruism among Holocaust rescuers. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 43-58.
2.
Andreoni, J., Brown, E., & Rischall, I. (2001). Charitable giving by married couples: Who decides and why does it matter?Journal of Human Resources, 38, 111-133.
3.
Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 293-312.
4.
Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Belfield, C. R., & Beney, A. P. (2000). What determines alumni generosity? Evidence for the UK. Educational Economics, 8, 65-80.
6.
Belle, D. (1982). The stress of caring: Women as providers of social support. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 496-505). New York: Free Press.
7.
Ben-Ner, A., Kong, F., & Putterman, L. (2004). Share and share alike? Gender-pairing, personality, and cognitive ability as determinants of giving. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 581-589.
8.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91, 67-72.
9.
Bolton, G. E., & Katok, E. (1995). An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economics Letters, 48, 287-292.
10.
Brooks, A. (2005). Does social capital make you generous?Social Science Quarterly, 86, 1-15.
11.
Brown, E., & Lankford, H. (1992). Gifts of money and gifts of time: Estimating the effects of tax prices and available time. Journal of Public Economics, 47, 321-341.
12.
Bryant, W. K., Jeon-Slaughter, H., Kang, H., & Tax, A. (2003). Participation in philanthropic activities: Donating money and time. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26, 42-73.
13.
Cannon, L. W., Higginbotham, E., & Leung, M. (1988). Race and class bias in qualitative research on women. Gender & Society, 2, 449-462.
14.
Carson, E. D. (1993). On race, gender, culture, and research on the voluntary sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 3, 327-335.
15.
Chambre, S. M. (1984). Is volunteering a substitute for role loss in old age? An empirical test of activity theory. The Gerontologist, 24, 292-298.
16.
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., & Ridge, R. (1992). Volunteers’ motivations: A functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 2, 333-350.
17.
Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., & Stukas, A. (1996). Volunteers’ motivations: Findings from a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25, 485-505.
18.
Cnaan, R. A., & Goldberg-Glen, R. S. (1991). Measuring motivation to volunteer in human services. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 27, 269-285.
19.
Conley, D. (2000). The racial wealth gap: Origins and implications for philanthropy in the African American community. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 530-540.
20.
Council of Economic Advisors. (2000). Philanthropy in the American economy. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754.
22.
Eisenberg, N. (1992). The caring child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Feshbach, N. D. (1982). Sex differences in empathy and social behavior in children. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 315-338). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Gallagher, S. K. (1994). Doing their share: Comparing patterns of help given by older and younger adults. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 567-578.
25.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223-237.
27.
Giving USA Foundation. (2004). Giving USA 2004. Glenview, IL: Author.
28.
Groves, R. M., Fultz, N. H., & Martin, E. (1991). Direct questioning about comprehension in a survey setting. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 49-61). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
Hall, H. (2004). Gender differences in giving: Going, going, gone?: Fundraising as a profession: Advancements and challenges in the field [Special issue]. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 43, 71-81.
30.
Hall, M. (2000). The measurement of charitable giving: Approaches employed in Canada’s National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Toronto: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy and Statistics Canada.
31.
Hall, M. (2001). Measurement issues in surveys of giving and volunteering and strategies applied in the design of Canada’s National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 515-526.
32.
Havens, J. J., & Schervish, P. G. (2001). The methods and metrics of the Boston Area Diary Study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 527-550.
33.
Hayghe, H. (1991). Volunteers in the U.S.: Who donates time?Monthly Labor Review, 114, 17-23.
34.
Hodgkinson, V. A., Weitzman, M. S., Noga, S. M., & Gorski, H. A. (1992). Giving and volunteering in the United States: Findings from a national survey. Washington, DC: Independent Sector.
35.
Hoffman, M. L. (1977). Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 712-720.
36.
Huer, M. B., & Saenz, T. I. (2003). Challenges and strategies for conducting survey and focus groups research with culturally diverse groups. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 209-220.
37.
Independent Sector. (1995). Giving and volunteering in the United States, 1994 volume II: Trends in giving and volunteering by type of charity. Washington, DC: Author.
38.
Independent Sector. (1999). Giving and volunteering in the United States, 1999 edition. Washington, DC: Author.
39.
Independent Sector. (2001). Giving and volunteering in the United States: Key findings. Washington, DC: Author.
40.
Janoski, T., Musick, M., & Wilson, J. (1998). Being volunteered? The impact of social participation and pro-social attitudes on volunteering. Sociological Forum, 13, 495-519.
41.
Kaplan, A. E., & Hayes, M. J. (1993). What we know about women as donors. Women as donors, women as philanthropists [special issue]. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 2, 5-20.
42.
Lammers, J. C. (1991). Attitudes, motives, and demographic predictors of volunteer commitment and service duration. Journal of Social Service Research, 14, 125-140.
43.
Latting, J. (1990). Motivational differences between Black and White volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 19, 121-136.
44.
Lemon, M., Palisi, B. J., & Bennett-Sandler, G. (1972). Dominant statuses and involvement in formal voluntary associations. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 1, 30-42.
45.
Loftus, E. F., Smith, K. D., Klinger, M. R., & Fiedler, J. (1991). Memory and mismemory for health events. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 102-137). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
46.
Lyons, N. P. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationships, and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 125-145.
47.
Maslanka, H. (1993). Women volunteers at GMHC. In C. Squire (Ed.), Women and AIDS: Psychological perspectives: Gender & psychology series (pp. 110-125). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
Menchik, P. L., & Weisbrod, B. S. (1987). Volunteer labor supply. Journal of Public Economics, 32, 159-183.
49.
McCarthy, K. D. (1996). Women and philanthropy. Voluntas, 7, 331-335.
50.
Mills, R. S., Pedersen, J., & Grusec, J. E. (1989). Sex differences in reasoning and emotion about altruism. Sex Roles, 20, 603-621.
51.
Morrow-Howell, N., Lott, L., & Ozawa, M. (1990). The impact of race on volunteer helping relationships among the elderly. Social Work, 35, 395-402.
52.
Musick, M. A., Wilson, J., & Bynum, W. E. (2000). Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of call and religion. Social Forces, 78, 1539-1571.
53.
O’Brien, K., Sedlacek, W. E., & Kandell, J. J. (1994). Willingness to volunteer among university students. NASPA Journal, 32, 67-73.
54.
O’Neill, M. (2001). Research on giving and volunteering: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 505-514.
55.
O’Neill, M., & Roberts, W. L. (2000). Giving and volunteering in California. San Francisco: University of San Francisco, Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management.
56.
Piliavin, J. A., & Unger, R. K. (1985). The helpful but helpless female: Myth or reality? In V. E. O’Leary, R. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women gender, and social psychology (pp. 149-189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
Ramos, H., & Kasper, G. (2000). Building a tradition of Latino philanthropy: Hispanics as donors, grantees, grantmakers, and volunteers. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy.
58.
Riccucci, N. M. (2002). Workforce diversity and the twenty-first century. In N. M. Riccucci (Ed.), Managing diversity in public sector workforces (pp. 1-10). Boulder, CO: Westview.
59.
Rooney, P. M., Mesch, D. J., Chin, W., & Steinberg, K. S. (2005). The effects of race, gender, and survey methodologies on giving in the U.S. Economics Letters, 86, 173-180.
60.
Rooney, P. M., Steinberg, K. S., & Schervish, P. G. (2001). A methodological comparison of giving surveys: Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 551-568.
61.
Rooney, P. M., Steinberg, K. S., & Shervish, P. G. (2004). Methodology is destiny. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4), 628-654.
62.
Rosenthal, S., Feiring, C., & Lewis, M. (1998). Political volunteering from late adolescence to young adulthood: Patterns and predictions. Journal Social Issues, 54, 471-493.
63.
Schlozman, D., Burns, N., & Verba, S. (1994). Gender and the pathways to participation: The role of resources. Journal of Politics, 56, 963-990.
64.
Smith, B., Shue, S., Vest, J. L., & Villareal, J. (1999). Philanthropy in communities of color. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
65.
Smith, D. H. (1983). Synanthrometrics: On progress in the development of a general theory of voluntary action and citizen participation. In D. H. Smith & J. Van Til (Eds.), International perspectives on voluntary action research (pp. 80-94). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
66.
Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23, 243-263.
67.
Smith, M. T. (2002, November). The decision to volunteer: Do childhood human capital investments impact the valuation of time? Paper presented at the ARNOVA Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
68.
Steinberg, K. S., Rooney, P. M., & Chin, W. (2002). Measurement of volunteering: A methodological study using Indiana as a test case. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 484-501.
69.
Sublett, D. (1993). Women’s approach to philanthropy: A learning model. Women as donors, women as philanthropists [special issue]. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 2, 47-59.
70.
Sundeen, R. A. (1992). Differences in personal goals and attitudes among volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21, 271-291.
71.
Tanur, J. M. (1991). Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
72.
Thompson, A. (1995). The sexual division of leadership in volunteer emergency medical service squads. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 6, 55-66.
73.
Todd, M., Davis, K. E., & Cafferty, T. P. (1984). Who volunteers for adult development research?: Research findings and practical steps to reach low volunteering groups. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 18, 177-184.
74.
Trudeau, K. J., & Devlin, A. L. (1996). College students and community service: Who, with whom, and why?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1867-1888.
75.
Van Slyke, D. M., & Eschholz, S. (2002, November). Are women more generous than men? Gender differences in motivations for charitable giving. Paper presented at the ARNOVA Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada.
76.
Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215-240.
77.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694-713.
78.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1998). The contribution of social resources to volunteering. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 799-814.
79.
Woodard, M. (1987). Voluntary association membership among Black Americans. Sociological Quarterly, 28, 285-301.
