Concern exists that organizations are not ready to take advantage of the growing number of older volunteers. This study offers a conceptualization and preliminary measurement strategy to enhance knowledge on the institutional capacity of volunteer programs to engage older adults. Data were collected from 51 program directors to assess 10 dimensions of institutional capacity: specification of role, dissemination of information, role availability, compensation of expenses, in-kind incentive, skill development, role flexibility, role recognition, accommodation, and integration. Eight factors were identified. The subscales were moderately reliable, and dimensions were independent. Programs rated highest on the capacity to recognize volunteers and disseminate information and lowest on their ability to provide cash compensation. Subsequent research on institutional capacity depends on its strong measurement. Future works will assess the extent to which these institutional capacity factors affect the recruitment, retention, and effective utilization of older volunteers.
Bass, S.A., & Caro, F.G. (1996). Theoretical perspectives in productive aging. In W. Crown (Ed.), Handbook on employment of the elderly (pp. 265-275). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
2.
Black, B., & Kovacs, P.J. (1999). Age-related variation in roles performed by hospice volunteers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 18(4), 479-497.
3.
Bradley, D.B. (1999-2000). A reason to rise each morning: The meaning of volunteering in the lives of older adults. Generations, 23(4), 45-50.
4.
Cahn, E.S. (1994). Aging policies, entitlement, and the deficit. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 6(1/2), 119-141.
5.
Caro, F.G., & Bass, S.A. (1997). Receptivity to volunteering in the immediate postretirement period. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 16(4), 427-442.
6.
Center for Health Communication, Harvard School of Public Health. (2004). Reinventing aging: Baby boomers and civic engagement. Boston: Author .
7.
Cnaan, R.A., & Cascio, T.A. (1999). Performance and commitment: Issues in management of volunteers in human service organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 34(3/4), 1-37.
8.
Endres, T., & Holmes, C. (2007, Winter). RespectAbility in America. Guiding principles for civic engagement among adults 55+. Generations, pp. 101-108.
9.
Estes, C.L., & Mahakian, J. (2001). The political economy of productive aging. In N. Morrow-Howell, J. E. Hinterlong, & M. N. Sherraden (Eds.), Productive aging: Concepts and challenges (pp. 197-213). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.
Farmer, S.M., & Fecor, D.B. (1999). Volunteer participation and withdrawal: A psychological contract perspective on the role of expectations and organizational support . Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9, 349-367.
11.
Ferrando, P., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2000). Unrestricted versus restricted factor analysis for multidimensional test items: Some aspects of the problem and some suggestions. Psicológica, 21, 301-323.
12.
Field, A.P. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows: Advanced techniques for the beginner. London: Sage.
13.
Finkelstein, M.A., Penner, L.A., & Brannick, M.T. (2005). Motive, role identity, and prosocial personality as predictors of volunteer activity. Social Behavior and Personality, 33(4), 403-418.
14.
Freedman, M. (2001). Structural lead: Building new institutions for an aging America. In N. Morrow-Howell, J. Hinterlong, & M. Sherraden (Eds.), Productive aging: Concepts and challenges (pp. 245-259). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Galindo, K.R., & Guzley, R.M. (2001). The Volunteer Satisfaction Index: Construct definition, measurement, development, and validation. Journal of Social Service Research, 28, 45-68.
16.
Garson, D. (2006). Reliability analysis: Internal consistency reliability . Retrieved December 2, 2006, from http://www.2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/reliab.htm
17.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
18.
Hinterlong, J., & Williamson, A. (2007, Winter). Civic engagement in later life: Renewing, sustaining, and developing private and public lives . Generations, pp. 10-17.
19.
Holstein, M. (2007). A critical reflection on civic engagement. Public Policy & Aging Report, 16(4), 1-26.
20.
Johnson, C., Parcel, M., Cobb, M., & Uy, D. (2004). Infrastructure of volunteer agencies: Capacity to absorb boomer volunteers. In Center for Health Communications (Ed.), Reinventing aging: Baby boomers and civic engagement (pp. 91-124). Boston: Harvard School of Public Health.
21.
Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
22.
Kaplan, M. (1993). Recruiting senior adult volunteers for intergenerational programs: Working to create a "Jump on the bandwagon effect." Journal of Applied Gerontology, 12(1), 71-82.
23.
Keith, P.M., & Schafer, R.B. (2002). Expected and actual difficulties of volunteer resident advocates in an ombudsman program. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 21, 421-436.
24.
Kovacs, P.J., & Black, B. (1999). Volunteerism and older adults: Implications for social work practice. Journal of Gerontological Social Work , 32(4), 25-39.
25.
Krause, N. (2004). Stressors arising in highly valued roles, meaning in life, and the physical health status of older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 59, 287-297.
26.
Martinson, M., & Minkler, M. (2006). Civic engagement and older adults: A critical perspective. The Gerontologist, 46(3), 318-324.
27.
Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., Sherraden, M., Tang, F., Thirupathy, P., & Nagchoudhuri, M. (2003). Institutional capacity for elder service. Social Development Issues, 25(1/2), 189-204.
28.
Nathanson, I.L., & Eggleton, E. (1993). Motivation versus program effect of length of service: A study of four cohorts of ombudservice volunteers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 19(3/4), 95-114.
29.
National Council on Aging. (2005). RespectAbility Web Survey executive summary March 2005. Retrieved April 29, 2007, from http://www.respectability.org/research/survey.pdf
30.
Netting, F.E., Nelson, H.W., Borders, K., & Huber, R. (2004). Volunteer and paid staff relationships: Implication for social work administration. Administration in Social Work , 28, 69-89.
31.
Pearce, J.L. (1993). Volunteers: The organizational behavior of unpaid workers. London: Routledge.
32.
Peter D. Hart Research Associates. (2002). 2002 Coming of age conference. Retrieved January 3, 2003, from http://civicventures.org/publications/surveys/new-face-of-work.cfm
33.
Putnam, R.D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13, 35-42.
34.
Rabiner, D.J., Koetse, E.C., Nemo, B., & Helfer, C.R. (2003). An overview and critique of the Experience Corps for Independent Living Initiative. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 15(1), 55-78.
35.
Riley, M.W., Foner, A., & Riley, J.W., Jr. (1999). The aging and society paradigm . In V. L. Bengtson & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of theories of aging (pp. 327-343). New York: Springer .
36.
Riley, M. W., Kahn, R. L., & Foner, A. (Eds.). (1994). Age and structural lag: Societies' failure to provide meaningful opportunities in work, family, and leisure. New York: John Wiley.
37.
Rochester, C., & Hutchison, R. (2002). A review of the home office older volunteers initiative . London: Crown.
38.
Rozario, P. (2007, Winter). Volunteering: An examination of rates, factors, and outcomes for current cohorts of older adults and baby boomers . Generations, pp. 31-36.
39.
Sherraden, M., Morrow-Howell, N., Hinterlong, J., & Rozario, P. (2001). Productive aging: Theoretical choices and directions . In N. Morrow-Howell, J. Hinterlong, & M. Sherraden (Eds.), Productive aging: Concepts and challenges (pp. 260-284). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
40.
Sherraden, M., Schreiner, M., & Beverly, S. (2002). Income, institutions, and saving performance in Individual Development Accounts (IDAs) (Working Paper 02-03). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development.
41.
Stevens, E.S. (1991). Toward satisfaction and retention of senior volunteers . Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 16, 33-41.
42.
Tang, F., Morrow-Howell, N., & Hong, S. (2007). Inclusion of diverse population in volunteering: The importance of institutional facilitation (Working Paper). St. Louis, MO: Washington University, Center for Social Development.
43.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M.A. (1999). Attachment to volunteering. Sociological Forum, 14(2), 243-272.
